Traded Collingwood trade F2, F3, F4 to Gold Coast for #22, 46, 58, 79 & F4
- Thread starter Taylor
- Start date
- Tagged users None
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Media made it sound like a Big Deal and was Solved on the 1st day of the Trade Period
North wont bid now.
The idea in bidding would be to screw the pies 2022 draft hand.
The pies answer is to have no 2022 draft hand.
Epic.
Why bother swapping future 4'ths?
Apart from that, it makes sense for both.
Apart from that, it makes sense for both.
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Trade it in Dogs/Cats Trade
Prochard123
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jul 28, 2014
- 7,147
- 5,773
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
But Gold Coast doesn’t even have pick 79?...
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Well that was easy to Fix then
hawkman
Hall of Famer
Bulldogs will ask for 36 for Lipinski you would think and Collingwood would offer 1 in the 40's.
That is a lot of list spots Collingwood will have to keep free
Lore
Moderator ❀
Essendon Player Sponsor 2022 - Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti and Archie Perkins
Essendon Upset Victory Tipping
LL
Essendon Player Sponsor 2021 - Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti and Archie Perkins
Essendon Player Sponsor 2020 - Orazio Fantasia, Anthony McDonald Tipungwuti, Shaun McKernan
Essendon Player Sponsor 2019 - Orazio Fantasia, Anthony McDonald Tipungwuti, Shaun McKernan
Essendon Board Goal Kicking Comp
Essendon Player Sponsor 2018 - Colyer, Fantasia, McDonald-Tipungwuti and McKernan
- Dec 14, 2015
- 45,593
- 67,793
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #14
According to what?
hawkman
Hall of Famer
That was a one off due to the uncertainty over list sizes
F**k me this 2020 draft haul better produce some long termers because we've set ourselves up for next to no additions over the next two drafts. We'll get Daicos, and our first rounder next year will be a top end pick, but you'd like a few more darts to throw at the board, that's for sure
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Henry/Macrare/Poulter/Mcreery/Ginnivan also been Promising at AFL Level
HeHateMe
Norm Smith Medallist
- Nov 28, 2009
- 8,065
- 6,828
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
About the same point value if both teams finish in the same ladder position next year.
We go to NM and advise them if Nick Daicos is available at pick 2 or later, we’d be interested in trading pick 22 for your 2022 2nd rounder on draft night, as we won’t need it to match a bid. Next years draft is meant to be far more heavily affected by F/S and northern academy kids. Possibly even some free agency band one and two’s.
To request NM not bid on ND at bid one would be draft tampering and we wouldn’t do that.
Last edited:
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
They will do trades where they consolidate say 3 picks into 2 so the points are the same but it saves them one list spot etc (we might even help them with this in the kreuger deal).
I for one am very happy with the first day of trading.
We get a host of picks to cover for young Nick, so well done on that, as that was our first goal.
We are also obviously on good terms with GC, so I wouldn't think a bid will come for Nick until Adelaide at pick 4 (more points saved).
There is still a long way to go in this trade period, so I am not to worried about losing next years later picks just yet.
We are on the right track.
We get a host of picks to cover for young Nick, so well done on that, as that was our first goal.
We are also obviously on good terms with GC, so I wouldn't think a bid will come for Nick until Adelaide at pick 4 (more points saved).
There is still a long way to go in this trade period, so I am not to worried about losing next years later picks just yet.
We are on the right track.
If NM don’t bid at pick one, we’ll flick pick 22 for a 2022 2nd rounder off someone, as we won’t need the points from that pick any more. Maybe an Essendon or St.Kilda who think they’ll do better next year, whereas I’m not so sure.
With Pendles signing on, I believe we have 9 list spots vacant. 2 required for Lipinski file and Kreuger. That’s 7 picks to take to the draft.
Promote Noble on draft night for a nothing pick and redraft a player or two.
