kane249
Wibble
- Oct 27, 2006
- 52,996
- 71,452
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Sth Freo, Liverpool, Chicago Bulls
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are correct, but a young team winning usually implies room for growth and improvement. An old (not necessarily West Coast, Fremantle 2016, West Coast 2021-3) team losing a lot implies a relatively lengthy rebuild is impending sans a Hail Mary like Dangerfield joining for chips, followed by Jeremy Cameron shortly after. Etc.
He averaged 24 disposals and kicked 35 goals and just turned 23.
He possesses a rare skillset he is worth 2 top 10 picks without anything coming your way.
Thnak God, let him go to West Coast so the Warner to Fremantle talks can stop.
Our focus should be Kozzie Pickett, not Warner.
Rough on the field ≠ flogHope so. Do not like nor want Pickett as a player. More than a bit of a flog.
He'd fit right in at Freo.
??As to why Eagles would do such a deal, its pretty obvious. If he hits FA, he aint joining us. He is joining Dockers. Our advantage is we can get him here 2 years earlier and he can so he will be joining on that advantage we hold
Oh well, we need good small forwards, he fits that need.Hope so. Do not like nor want Pickett as a player. More than a bit of a flog.
He'd fit right in at Freo.
Id take 2 mill less to join Fremantle every day of the week and twice on Fridays. Most of his convos were with Fremantle befiore the Bolton trade for a reason??
We would still have more money available than Freo in 2 years who are probably up to their necks in finals. Not like the Eagles wont be an attractive prospect in 2 years either, a huge haul of youngsters with the oldest entering their prime, Warner could come straight in to replace Yeo in the midfield.
the Eagles have overhauled their list considerably in the last few seasons..adding a young A grade mid is hardly a 'hail mary' but rather part of the rebuild..we can get the Chad and still have access to top end talent in next years draft
You are not ChadId take 2 mill less to join Fremantle every day of the week and twice on Fridays. Most of his convos were with Fremantle befiore the Bolton trade for a reason
He hasnt been too secretive about it so its fair to jump to a few conclusions I think. Its clear though that free agency he has a choice between WCE and Freo. 2025 trade period we dont have this issueYou are not Chad
How do you know who most of his convos were with? Did you ask Chad?
Rough on the field ≠ flog
Bloke is as quiet spoken and polite as you'll ever meet lol
Finally!
Finally!
It's going to take a long time to go past us in that stat considering the turnover still required at WC and veterans coming up for retirement.
Collingwood off the chart & the oldest ever list. They could be bottom 4 soon.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I'm talking about having an older team.It's going to take a long time to go past you in that stat? Like in 2025 you mean like I just posted?
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I'm talking about having an older team.
You missed my point.
The Hail Mary doesn’t apply to West Australian clubs. We don’t get to add top 10 players in the league for peanuts via free agency or other mechanisms.
I never implied Warner was a Hail Mary. I’m saying Geelong avoiding a rebuild is about luck, father sons, free agents, ludicrous sponsor deals (Bailey Smith) etc etc
Includes Walters, Fyfe, Jaeger, Aish, Banfield and tries to finagle in a bunch of old fringe players. Somehow doesn't include Triple J amongst others.Fremantle isn't that young a team anymore for your best 23
In 2025 the ages of of the players usually in your best are
Walters 34
Fyfe 33
O'Meara 31
Pearce 29
Aish 29
Ryan 29
Switowski 28
Banfield 27
Darcy 26
Cox 26
Bolton 26
Brayshaw 25
Serong 24
Young 24
Clark 24
Frederick 24
If the likes of McDonald (29), Wagner (28), Narkle (27), or Brodie (26) get games its only going to skew that stat further.
Fremantle isn't that young a team anymore for your best 23
In 2025 the ages of of the players usually in your best are
Walters 34 - will likely be out of 22 in 2025
Fyfe 33 - as above
O'Meara 31 - as above
Pearce 29
Aish 29 - is already out of the 22 (end of 2024)
Ryan 29
Switowski 28
Banfield 27 - is already out of the 22 (end of 2024)
Darcy 26
Cox 26
Bolton 26
Brayshaw 25
Serong 24
Young 24
Clark 24
Frederick 24
If the likes of McDonald (29) - not in the 22 , Wagner (28), Narkle (27) - not in the 22, or Brodie (26) - not in the 22, get games it’s only going to skew that stat further.
Includes Walters, Fyfe, Jaeger, Aish, Banfield and tries to finagle in a bunch of old fringe players. Somehow doesn't include Triple J amongst others.
Tell me you don't watch Freo without telling me you don't watch Freo.
We actually have done most of the turnover required, if not for our 3 f/s and NGA kids in 2025 we probably would be aiming at taking the minimum 3 picks in the draft, while trying to trade out the rest of the picks for players from other clubs, or chasing FAs.Finally!
It's going to take a long time to go past us in that stat considering the turnover still required at WC and veterans coming up for retirement.
Collingwood off the chart & the oldest ever list. They could be bottom 4 soon.
That's our Best? That's funny.Fremantle isn't that young a team anymore for your best 23
In 2025 the ages of of the players usually in your best are
Walters 34
Fyfe 33
O'Meara 31
Pearce 29
Aish 29
Ryan 29
Switowski 28
Banfield 27
Darcy 26
Cox 26
Bolton 26
Brayshaw 25
Serong 24
Young 24
Clark 24
Frederick 24
If the likes of McDonald (29), Wagner (28), Narkle (27), or Brodie (26) get games its only going to skew that stat further.
Acknowledging that I am almost definitely engaging with a bad-faith troll or someone with eastern state-level knowledge about the club (or both):Walters played 17 games in 2024, Fyfe 22, O'Meara 22, Aish 20 and Banfield 22
How does that not qualify as regular players for you?
No idea who Triple J is either