- May 6, 2007
- 42,560
- 26,005
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspurs, Melbourne Vixen
that's just daftAny club offering him 6 years would have been negligent.
an AA calibre player being left to his own devices. that is negligence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
that's just daftAny club offering him 6 years would have been negligent.
Yes but you asked which non best 22 player had essentially 5 years left, i answered thatNo, I just think you've reached the point of not reading what you're responding to, before you actually respond.
I've already said I don't have a major issue with 6 years for McGrath.
No, that's not what I asked.Yes but you asked which non best 22 player had essentially 5 years left, i answered that
The issue here is you're pulling things out of thin air to support your argument.Your issue is also that Hayward shouldnt be used as a part of the examples to determine market value. His lesser type is being offered as much if not greater than Mcgrath to move elsewhere. LESSER TYPE
Youve also managed to overlook my other 5 year examples
B.Cox, Quaynor, Rachelle, Soligo (Pre this year), Florent, Hipwood, J.Payne, JVR, Simpkin, Himmelberg, Xerri
That seems like backwards logic.Just because there is nothing in media (i assume what your talking about) to suggest another club offered him 6 years does not necessarily mean he wasnt
I highly doubt there was no club that would be happy to offer Mcgrath atleast 5 years if he wanted to moveThat seems like backwards logic.
I think it’s pretty safe to assume no one else was offering him a big deal when there was literally no news of such a thing.