
I actually like Paris. Would love to see him tried alongside Haze. But without Haze, Boland is a safe bet.If paris was called into the team he would go okay ....he is a very good bowler ..rate him more than Abott or Doggett
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I actually like Paris. Would love to see him tried alongside Haze. But without Haze, Boland is a safe bet.If paris was called into the team he would go okay ....he is a very good bowler ..rate him more than Abott or Doggett
Not disagreeing Westie, just saying Boland isn’t the issue. Would happily have Paris over the other 2If Boland is 35 Paris is in the mix...
No issue with Boland playing this test...but Dogget is 30 Abbot is 32.....paris I rate a lot more than those two
Boland has shown he can play at this level, and in Pink ball tests, not sure what the issue isif we were 3-0 up or 3-0 down i would probably agree with you, pick someone who may be the future. but were 1-0 down after being embarrassed in perth. in this situation you dont pick for the future you pick to win and should pick people in form.
whats the difference between playing two left armers and playing two right armers? and we shouldnt pick someone who's currently fit because they havent been fit in the past? using that logic cummins never would have played for australia again after 2011
Boland has shown he can play at this level, and in Pink ball tests, not sure what the issue is
India unchanged?
India unchanged?
Rohit will enjoy the extended dinner breaks this testRohit is back at least, Gill might be both played in the A game before this test
Fair insNothing has been announced but I'd expect Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill to come in for Paddikal and Jurel.
2 shield, 1 Aus A, 1 pm ximy issue with boland is that he has only played 1 shield game and the PMXI game since being injured in april and hasnt looked convincing
Sorry, 1 shield2 shield, 1 Aus A, 1 pm xi
2 shield, 1 Aus A, 1 pm xi
Playing it smart and prob announce team last minute. Not sure why we've shown our hand so early. Much better i thought to keep them guessing instead of just gifting them them team info to assist with their preparation.India unchanged?
Who was guessing with what we picked?Playing it smart and prob announce team last minute. Not sure why we've shown our hand so early. Much better i thought to keep them guessing instead of just gifting them them team info to assist with their preparation.
Watched him bowl in the AUS A game, looked fine to me. Has plenty of overs in the legs, now we just need to see if he can perform
wickets list for current sheffield shield season, 1 game.
28 overs, match figures of 3/104
i forgot about the AUS A game
Reasonable argumentWhilst I’m disappointed with the last result, and I’ll admit we could’ve begun blooding more players sooner, I really don’t understand the level of hatred here.
This Australian team have been pretty successful. For the most part they seem like nice guys, they cop it from the opposition, they don’t complain, they get an unlucky result, they don’t complain. They don’t sledge. They seem like consummate professionals.
Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Nathan Lyon, hell, even Neser and ScoBo would be in most teams.
I just really don’t understand what most of you want - this has been a good team, they’ve done very well. You all support AFL clubs - if the same level of criticism was applied half the coaches/senior players would be out of a job.
Playing it smart and prob announce team last minute. Not sure why we've shown our hand so early. Much better i thought to keep them guessing instead of just gifting them them team info to assist with their preparation.
you don't think time goes into researching opposition players?Who was guessing with what we picked?
Marsh seemed very unlikely to play till they told us he was right to go.What’s the guessing though everyone knew our side what’s the point
Reasonable argument
I can only speak for myself but the criticism I have is
A) certain players get a free pass (Marnus) where selection integrity becomes questionable
And
B) the selectors lack of planning for the future is strikingly poor (and also predictable)
Marsh seemed very unlikely to play till they told us he was right to go.
When would you have dropped Labs, and who for?Reasonable argument
I can only speak for myself but the criticism I have is
A) certain players get a free pass (Marnus) where selection integrity becomes questionable
And
B) the selectors lack of planning for the future is strikingly poor (and also predictable)
We don't know that at all. In fact i recall you yourself rubbishing the idea of playing Marsh as a specialist bat. Just don't get the point of announcing the team now when we could do it at the toss. We need any edge we can get right now!He was playing as a batsman anyway regardless it’s just whether he was bowling. Makes zero difference to the team it’s the same top 6