Trades 2025 Fantasy Round 4 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Some more intel on Demonland from a member of the official Demon Army, who goes to virtually every training session and talks to individual players. Never posts about fantasy.

''X defs back for gather round''

Also says ''No Ricky Lever'' and ''Jai playing for Casey tomorrow''.

This was from today's captain's run.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

I'd honestly probably take a donut in Best 18 if he misses this week.

He only scored 77 last week and I had a 3k round rank. Back in a rookie to match that score and have him back next week (assuming its a touch and go issue and not a this has become bigger than we thought issue).
 
Some more intel on Demonland from a member of the official Demon Army, who goes to virtually every training session and talks to individual players. Never posts about fantasy.

''X defs back for gather round''

Also says ''No Ricky Lever'' and ''Jai playing for Casey tomorrow''.

This was from today's captain's run.
Almost have to hold now if he’s back next week… means I may have to go with my Washcroft plan, or I could get slightly creative, still undertake my Dunks plan and trade Lindsay back in next week….
 
Almost have to hold now if he’s back next week… means I may have to go with my Washcroft plan, or I could get slightly creative, still undertake my Dunks plan and trade Lindsay back in next week….

Can you go FOS > Bice instead of Lindsay? Don’t think he has much value left and you can trade Campo next week for another rookie that looks good. Langford etc
 
Some more intel on Demonland from a member of the official Demon Army, who goes to virtually every training session and talks to individual players. Never posts about fantasy.

''X defs back for gather round''

Also says ''No Ricky Lever'' and ''Jai playing for Casey tomorrow''.

This was from today's captain's run.

Couldn't he be named as sub, to ease him back in? That's one of my fears. Cash gen already dropped a bit, with a 37 BE. If he gets named as sub, it'll completely tank.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Like Dunks a lot more too but I’m 30k short using FOS :(

Getting rid of Lindsay now is not ideal but I don’t think it’s that bad if you plan to get him back.

Worst case - You have to get him back for the same price you got rid of him for

Best case for fantasy - He is sub or out for more games than anticipated and it was a good decision getting rid of him earlier etc

Depends what you think is worse, the risk that Dunkley gets a 130 if don’t you get him or an 80 if you do. That’s how I usually decide.
 
Yes, but we also have to trade Lindsay back in ....yes, I'm afraid I did ....but not without a fight

I hate trading rookies I don't want to say goodbye too .....yes, goodbye to the other not as good, Warner
EDIT:

I found a way of keeping Lindsay ....under my prior iteration, I lost cash cows Warner & Lindsay, to bring in Maric and Morales

My new scenario, I lose SDK ...but retain Lindsay, Warner, and strengthen my midfield bench with Maric .....$260K ITB

Warner was to shower me with $$$ this week
 
Couldn't he be named as sub, to ease him back in? That's one of my fears. Cash gen already dropped a bit, with a 37 BE. If he gets named as sub, it'll completely tank.
I reckon the cash gen comes secondary to the fact he is a rookie who can avg 80 after his return week. That's invaluable for best 22. Who else do you trust of the rookie class to have on field for the next month? Maybe Lashcroft and Davidson and that's it.

He'll eventually get up to $750k imo, no rush and no issue for me if it takes him until the byes.
 
If Trac gets FWD dpp you probably have to hold.

Fair point. Hard to know who to move up to Bray or if I just suck eggs and miss out on the Tigers match up.
 
Getting rid of Lindsay now is not ideal but I don’t think it’s that bad if you plan to get him back.

Worst case - You have to get him back for the same price you got rid of him for

Best case for fantasy - He is sub or out for more games than anticipated and it was a good decision getting rid of him earlier etc

Depends what you think is worse, the risk that Dunkley gets a 130 if don’t you get him or an 80 if you do. That’s how I usually decide.
Yeah the fact that Dunks has a good record at the G + a good run coming up + playing the Tigs+ Season keeper+ C/VC pick weekly is what has made me pick him all week

I'll have 46k in the bank if I do and if FOS puts up a semi decent score this week, I wont have to find too much cash to bring Lindsay back
 
I reckon the cash gen comes secondary to the fact he is a rookie who can avg 80 after his return week. That's invaluable for best 22. Who else do you trust of the rookie class to have on field for the next month? Maybe Lashcroft and Davidson and that's it.

He'll eventually get up to $750k imo, no rush and no issue for me if it takes him until the byes.

I reckon Langford can do the same or similar average to Lindsay if he keeps getting midfield time
 

Trades 2025 Fantasy Round 4 Trades


Write your reply...
Back
Top