Preview 2025 Best 22 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

there's no hurry. just needs to get his body right for September with a few games to get in form so he can play the grandie and get his medal before retiring (Crawford style). Ras to get games and we get an answer one way or the other in the meantime. He earnt the chance for his efforts at Peel.
Funny you mention Crawford, that's usually my reference point for Nat as well.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Switta most like for like.

Suspect he could replace Sturt (in a different role) but not Freddy.
I'd be happy with the Switta swap, but only if he isn't performing. I'm still a big Switta fan.

I'd hope not Sturty, I want a full uninterrupted season into him to see what he can really do. I'm a big Sturty fan too.

Man, this team is loaded with players I want to get games into without dropping anybody.
 
Switta most like for like.

Suspect he could replace Sturt (in a different role) but not Freddy.
Interesting the whole role thing.
If you had 6 Matthew Pavliches, would you only play 5 plus Banners so you had a different role?
If you had 6 Ballantynes, would you only play 5 plus Kepler for the different role?
At what point do you just play the best available players and model the team play about the relative strengths/weaknesses that brings??
Just asking.
 
Interesting the whole role thing.
If you had 6 Matthew Pavliches, would you only play 5 plus Banners so you had a different role?
If you had 6 Ballantynes, would you only play 5 plus Kepler for the different role?
At what point do you just play the best available players and model the team play about the relative strengths/weaknesses that brings??
Just asking.

6 Pavliches as Banners is a ball burner
 
Interesting the whole role thing.
If you had 6 Matthew Pavliches, would you only play 5 plus Banners so you had a different role?
If you had 6 Ballantynes, would you only play 5 plus Kepler for the different role?
At what point do you just play the best available players and model the team play about the relative strengths/weaknesses that brings??
Just asking.

All I know is now I want to see a forward line of 6 Keplers.
 
Interesting the whole role thing.
If you had 6 Matthew Pavliches, would you only play 5 plus Banners so you had a different role?
If you had 6 Ballantynes, would you only play 5 plus Kepler for the different role?
At what point do you just play the best available players and model the team play about the relative strengths/weaknesses that brings??
Just asking.
Depends on the players and your system. You play whatever you think gives you the best chance of winning.

Freddy for example has attributes that Simpson doesn't, so if you value the role highly, you still pick Freddy even if Simpson is better.

And you can easily fit 6 Pav's into any team.
 
[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji6][emoji6]" data-quote="pK[emoji[emoji6]][emoji6]" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
Yeah, acknowledge that [emoji[emoji6]] is still pretty small for a medium, Emmett was [emoji[emoji6]][emoji6] which is probably the cut off point in my mind. [emoji[emoji6]][emoji6]-[emoji[emoji6][emoji6]] would be my definition of “medium”

I know it’s a long time ago but Dermy was (is) [emoji[emoji6]][emoji6]


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview 2025 Best 22 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top