List Mgmt. 2024 GWS Giants List Management - Academy, Free Agent, Trade & Draft

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: 2k TT. Is it really that important for AFL? Tommo used to kill these things but was slow as a wet week. Burst speed is far more important. Most players wouldn't run 2ks in a game before going to the bench for a rest.
Well, if you want your midfielder to be able to run up and down the ground and then impact a contest, they need reasonable endurance. Even the forwards are chasing back and then running into I50, so they need reasonable endurance too.

Presuming Hannaford's is not as terrible as 7 1/2 minutes indicates, he could play fewer minutes in bursts. Peatling only averaged something like 57% game time IIRC.
 
Well, if you want your midfielder to be able to run up and down the ground and then impact a contest, they need reasonable endurance. Even the forwards are chasing back and then running into I50, so they need reasonable endurance too.

Presuming Hannaford's is not as terrible as 7 1/2 minutes indicates, he could play fewer minutes in bursts. Peatling only averaged something like 57% game time IIRC.

But I think it's rare a player would need to run continuously in a game for 3-4 minutes without a stoppage, score, throw in or something that holds play up. Pace for repeated shorter efforts is a better asset than endurance pace.
 
But I think it's rare a player would need to run continuously in a game for 3-4 minutes without a stoppage, score, throw in or something that holds play up. Pace for repeated shorter efforts is a better asset than endurance pace.
I think the 2km is more a defacto measure of how much of a quarter someone can run out. You are right that it's more a case of repeated sprints in-game.
 
I'm not gonna pretend that I know more than our recruitment team but I was hoping that we get mids first. I'm sure players we picked up will be good but...
Basically all the best pure mids were gone by our selection, so we can't blame recruiters for that.Ough as developing mid (he isnt 18 yet)has upside and rated pretty highly in a quality draft .
 
Basically all the best pure mids were gone by our selection, so we can't blame recruiters for that.Ough as developing mid (he isnt 18 yet)has upside and rated pretty highly in a quality draft .
Also, Ough has a December birthday, so he's very young in comparison to most of this draft class. There's significant potential upside to him.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

As far as I'm aware NSW/ACT prelisted rookie guys are only taken as Cat B rookies. But maybe I'm wrong.

I guess we'll see tomorrow.

It just strikes me as pointless to move someone from B to A just to put someone else onto the B list.
Brisbane has done both in the past - moved players from Cat B to Cat A (although that was back when it made a difference) and prelisted into Cat A because Cat B was full. Nothing ever seems to be announced on the breakdown of B vs A.
 
If this is correct we must be moving at least one of our current Cat B guys to being a Cat A rookie


I've seen some club lists (numbers not names) on other boards quoting footywire or zerohanger sources that GWS is showing 1 Cat B and 2 Cat A (no names). That indicates that we've already moved someone from B to A. I presume that Madden would be the most likely (rather than Wardius).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2024 GWS Giants List Management - Academy, Free Agent, Trade & Draft

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top