We're past the pick 55 mark so that helps our points situation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Well, if you want your midfielder to be able to run up and down the ground and then impact a contest, they need reasonable endurance. Even the forwards are chasing back and then running into I50, so they need reasonable endurance too.Re: 2k TT. Is it really that important for AFL? Tommo used to kill these things but was slow as a wet week. Burst speed is far more important. Most players wouldn't run 2ks in a game before going to the bench for a rest.
Well, if you want your midfielder to be able to run up and down the ground and then impact a contest, they need reasonable endurance. Even the forwards are chasing back and then running into I50, so they need reasonable endurance too.
Presuming Hannaford's is not as terrible as 7 1/2 minutes indicates, he could play fewer minutes in bursts. Peatling only averaged something like 57% game time IIRC.
I think the 2km is more a defacto measure of how much of a quarter someone can run out. You are right that it's more a case of repeated sprints in-game.But I think it's rare a player would need to run continuously in a game for 3-4 minutes without a stoppage, score, throw in or something that holds play up. Pace for repeated shorter efforts is a better asset than endurance pace.
Basically all the best pure mids were gone by our selection, so we can't blame recruiters for that.Ough as developing mid (he isnt 18 yet)has upside and rated pretty highly in a quality draft .I'm not gonna pretend that I know more than our recruitment team but I was hoping that we get mids first. I'm sure players we picked up will be good but...
Or even into the rookie selection!Logan Smith might slide all the way to our next pick at this rate.
Also, Ough has a December birthday, so he's very young in comparison to most of this draft class. There's significant potential upside to him.Basically all the best pure mids were gone by our selection, so we can't blame recruiters for that.Ough as developing mid (he isnt 18 yet)has upside and rated pretty highly in a quality draft .
I did mention that Big StriderAlso, Ough has a December birthday, so he's very young in comparison to most of this draft class. There's significant potential upside to him.
So you did, so you did!I did mention that Big Strider
If this is correct we must be moving at least one of our current Cat B guys to being a Cat A rookie
As far as I'm aware NSW/ACT prelisted rookie guys are only taken as Cat B rookies. But maybe I'm wrong.If our Cat B list is full, can't we just automatically add him to the Cat A rookie list?
I guess we'll see tomorrow.As far as I'm aware NSW/ACT prelisted rookie guys are only taken as Cat B rookies. But maybe I'm wrong.
As far as I'm aware NSW/ACT prelisted rookie guys are only taken as Cat B rookies. But maybe I'm wrong.
Brisbane has done both in the past - moved players from Cat B to Cat A (although that was back when it made a difference) and prelisted into Cat A because Cat B was full. Nothing ever seems to be announced on the breakdown of B vs A.I guess we'll see tomorrow.
It just strikes me as pointless to move someone from B to A just to put someone else onto the B list.
Good luck to him as a sunOK, we elected not to match a bid on Cooper Bell. Off to Gold Coast.
If this is correct we must be moving at least one of our current Cat B guys to being a Cat A rookie