Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Don't know if you can have more than one Dempsey on a team. outside runner... Would throw out the balance.My comp for him has been ollie dempsey, would be awesome having both of them on the wings
Given the trades that have gone down i don't even think our future 1st would do itWould a F2 get us in around 35-37? I think possible. If Shanahan and Dodson are gone, most likely, then they probably take Jacques there, and at 42 maybe Gerreyn. Then they probably take Ivisic later, with probably Bice last selection. Wouldn't rule out Stumpf late either.
They need help now for Nick malaka Larkey .
At this stage if Whitlock makes it he might replace Larkey.
The notion that the 30th best player in this draft is pound for pound equal to or better than pick 12-14 in another is ridiculous.
Just keep our pick and enjoy Bailey Smiths next decade. Leave the embarrassing stuff to the Norfs of the world.
Ps If we had done the deal that Norf did it would have made sense as moving from 12-14 to 20 next year was a Zac Touhy type of trade. For Norf it’s just a ridiculous gamble from a desperate punter
No offence but if history has taught us anything the reason players slide is that they are no good. Recruiters know more than media mockersIf we’d traded our FF for Shanahan at around pick 20-24 no one would have batted an eyelid. But now he’s slipped to being at 28, you have doubts as to whether it’s a value move.
The problem we have is that there are still a swathe of picks before we get a crack and it’s very possible that the likes of Shanahan (certainly), Gerreyn, Boxshall and Clarke are all taken before our first.
So do you offer your FF to secure at least one player (Shanahan) you can walk away with at the end of the draft that is of high quality or do you roll the dice and hope that one or two fall to 42 and 50?
No offence but if history has taught us anything the reason players slide is that they are no good. Recruiters know more than media mockers
The list of guys “projected to go in the teens” that slid right out translating to successful AFL players would be small
Off the top of my head people were begging for day 2 sliders like Dev Robertson, Matt Johnson, Trent Bianco, Will Gould, Josh Worrell, our very own Charlie Constable
Are Academy players not players??After academy picks it could end up more like pick 25. Doesn’t appear unreasonable when put like that. Plus Shanahan importantly fills a need.
Doubt we entertain it though.
Are Academy players not players??
You’d like me to believe that the quality of this draft is in fact double of every previous draft. I’d say that’s statistically impossible. Yep you might strike gold but what’s far more likely is that this super draft at a maximum produces 15% more players.
The flexibility of holding our 1st round pick and the currency of what we can turn that into seems far better than taking a flyer at a player passed over not once but multiple times by the same clubs. Some of them good clubs like Sydney with the same needs as us.
I’d consider a pick slide but that’s off the table now Rich have lost the F2
We don't have much depth behind Nank, just Ryan and throw in Balta at worst case. Rucks are an interesting one yes you get the odd one like Gawn who gets drafted and turns out to be a gun at that club but majority of them get drafted take a while to develop and get picked off by other clubs down the track. I think we got enough out of the draft last night for next year we would be better off trading this first pick tonight.I don't think they need a ruck plus they will get offered future 1sts for 28.
Also if they want davidson they are better to trade 28 out then trade in a 40s pick for davidson instead of using 28 on him.
The old Israeli mobilisation of the reserves conundrum. If you mobilise them then you deter the invasion from neighbouring countries but then it looks like you didn't need to mobilise to begin with and everyone thinks you look silly.You wonder if Essendon got bluffed by other clubs to trade out there first.
They could of got Lindsay and Kako.
Surely they could of traded out on the night though, wait and see.The old Israeli mobilisation of the reserves conundrum. If you mobilise them then you deter the invasion from neighbouring countries but then it looks like you didn't need to mobilise to begin with and everyone thinks you look silly.
With the dons trading out there was no point bidding earlier. If they didn't then maybe the bid comes in.
Someone said he's 3 plus years away .In five years time when Whitlock is ready for AFL?
Trade in to get _______... I hope ________ is available at our pick... Let's use our F1 to get into the draft early for _____.
What's the point, most draft threads of years gone by shows how collectively misinformed this board is on players.
Highlights packages make all draft hopefuls look good.
Let's just keep the picks we have and select the best player we can where we're at.
Would 36 for 50, F2 be possible with GWS. Allows you to get ahead of Essendon.Given the trades that have gone down i don't even think our future 1st would do it