Dixie Flatline
Moderator
- Jun 3, 2005
- 36,818
- 38,042
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Cartagena C.F., NYJ, A's
- Moderator
- #1,201
Don't want another redraft league but wouldn't mind an auction dynasty league.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
True, plus you'll get sympathy joinsIt's easier to attract people when its all set up, they can see all the rules etc
Also, you can set up a league and pay for it later, so ill do that
But id like to make it higher stakes. But not sure what people would be willing to pay?True, plus you'll get sympathy joins
"ive paid for this league and no one wants to play"
"Ok GG I'll play"
Tough with dynasty to get people to commit $100+ a year. If you have a bad start up draft/auction youre donating a lot of money. $50-$60 max I reckon. We use a rule in one of the leagues I run for $50 entry per year. If you trade future firsts you have to pay entry up to that season (ie: if you trade your 2025 first in the midst of the 2024 season you have to pay $50 for 2025 on the spot, if you trade both 2025 and 2026 you have to pay $100 on the spot etc). Nothing worse than trying to find a replacement for a $50 league on a team with an average roster and no future picks.But id like to make it higher stakes. But not sure what people would be willing to pay?
50-100 entry fee, x12, minus league fee (60 or so?), anywhere from say 400 for champion to 1000 or nearabouts
Thats a good policy, especially if the league is made up of strangers and randoms. At least here its usually the usual suspects. But yeah 50 sounds ok. Really anything from 30-50, depending what people want, whichll determine prize poolTough with dynasty to get people to commit $100+ a year. If you have a bad start up draft/auction youre donating a lot of money. $50-$60 max I reckon. We use a rule in one of the leagues I run for $50 entry per year. If you trade future firsts you have to pay entry up to that season (ie: if you trade your 2025 first in the midst of the 2024 season you have to pay $50 for 2025 on the spot, if you trade both 2025 and 2026 you have to pay $100 on the spot etc). Nothing worse than trying to find a replacement for a $50 league on a team with an average roster and no future picks.
Too much cash at stake IMHO.But id like to make it higher stakes. But not sure what people would be willing to pay?
50-100 entry fee, x12, minus league fee (60 or so?), anywhere from say 400 for champion to 1000 or nearabouts
Feb 12When is the deadline for cutting players?
More proof of how LUCKY he is.And a scoring adjustment pushes fuey above adp score in the end
I don't see it as a big issue. You're only doing it as one week bye week fill in most cases , plus you get a dead cap hit for any player you pick up then drop the following week so it's not like it's a massive win.Just on Empire …can we get rid of allowing all players on byes to go on Taxi except punters and kickers. No need for it and it dilutes the FA pool. Favours those who have more time
What ADP said. There was and is no "gaming" issue that I saw. If you did manage to put say two or three star bye players on taxi like a QB, RB, WR, that each have a salary of 5m. Ok, you made 15m cap space for the week (taxi players count for 0% of their salary) and signed three players from waivers to fill the roster for that week. But when that week ends, you have an ineligible roster (players on taxi no longer on bye) so can't submit a lineup until you a) get eligible, and b) get under the cap....so you can't keep those temp players, have to cut them, bring your three stars back to active, and 15m salary returns to your cap.Just on Empire …can we get rid of allowing all players on byes to go on Taxi except punters and kickers. No need for it and it dilutes the FA pool. Favours those who have more time
Work out your bye weeks and plan the squad around that if you have to or just bad luck like other seasons. …this isn’t Cutthroat. We have squads of 42 including rookies. Issue came about with covid a couple seasons back ..that’s no longer an issue in NFLI don't see it as a big issue. You're only doing it as one week bye week fill in most cases , plus you get a dead cap hit for any player you pick up then drop the following week so it's not like it's a massive win.
The either bad luck or take risk in FA ..like other seasons.Also, I can't distinguish punters and kickers only anyway. The option is just allow bye players or not.
Not really fair. Last season your three QBs and 6 of your RWTs and half your IDPs didnt have the same bye weeks. But then the next year they all have byes on the same week. It's a dynasty. That's your long-term roster. You can't cut star players the following season when you see many have the same bye week.Work out your bye weeks and plan the squad around that if you have to or just bad luck like other seasons. …this isn’t Cutthroat. We have squads of 42 including rookies. Issue came about with covid a couple seasons back ..that’s no longer an issue in NFL