What will happen first?

Remove this Banner Ad

Chelsea had their strongest possible lineup out there. So can't use the popular injuries excuse and they finished with 11 men.
I thought I was wrong but you've proved otherwise.

They did not have their strongest line-up out there.

Essien wasn't playing.

Nor was Malouda.

Can't assess the game fairly with two first XI players missing.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yep I agree, you can't assess the game fairly with Ferdinand and Carrick not fit to start.
 
I thought I was wrong but you've proved otherwise.

They did not have their strongest line-up out there.

Essien wasn't playing.

Nor was Malouda.

Can't assess the game fairly with two first XI players missing.


that is the weakest excuse i have ever heard.how can you not assess that fairly.s**t if we had of had hargreaves we might have been good for four nil.
 
I thought I was wrong but you've proved otherwise.

They did not have their strongest line-up out there.

Essien wasn't playing.

Nor was Malouda.

Can't assess the game fairly with two first XI players missing.

What about our star striker Franco Di Santo, where was he?!?!?!?!
 
Yep I agree, you can't assess the game fairly with Ferdinand and Carrick not fit to start.
sorry son. you don't make it to the bonus round.

carrick is excluded from excuses because he was deemed not good enough to make the strongest XI available.

so they had double the talent missing.

considering that their performance was commendable.
 
The bottom line is they lost 3-0 and couldn't score with Evans and Neville in United's defence.

Could have a center back pairing of Ryan Donk and Titus Bramble and they still wouldn't have scored, this is the beginning of the end for Chelsea....
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top