- Jul 13, 2015
- 36,739
- 40,890
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
You're a confirmed jerk, H.
My grandmother was Canadian Inuit. I guess I could say that Im Inuit?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're a confirmed jerk, H.
Rest assured my understanding of this issue is not drawn from Dark Emu alone.
And you prove my point, as does that horrid little site.
Any deviation from the colonisation myths has to be brutally attacked, as you're doing here.
Personally, I wouldn't be taking ALL of Dark Emu as gospel or proven scientific fact. And Pascoe's heritage actually has nothing to do with the wider issue.
Thing is, my point about the British colonisers having to destroy all evidence of the sophisticated societies they attacked and destroyed, and now the colonial society itself having to viciously assault any suggestion that the First Nations people were anything but nomadic hunter gatherer or "savages" is repeated again and again, from Ireland to the US to Canada.
Just now?
Updated May 25, 2017 - first published May 24, 2017first published May 24, 2017irst published May 24, 2017irst published May 24, 2017irst published May 24, 2017irst published May 24, 2017irst published May 24, 2017first published May 24, 2017Quadrant editor issues 'unreserved' apology to the ABC over 'sick and unhinged' Manchester blast article
Quadrant's editor buckles to public and political pressure and apologises to ABC for comment piece.www.smh.com.au
...In the original piece Quadrant's online editor, Roger Franklin, wrote that "had there been a shred of justice", the Manchester blast would have "detonated in an Ultimo TV studio".
He added that, if such an attack took place, "none of the panel's likely casualties would have represented the slightest reduction in humanity's intelligence, decency, empathy or honesty".
The contentious passage was later amended to begin: "What if that blast had detonated in an Ultimo TV studio?" and it remains on the journal's site, entitled "The Manchester Bomber's ABC Pals"...
June 3 – 9, 2017Quadrant and its slide into deluded extremism
Once seen as a journal of intellectual weight, today’s Quadrant has gone off-leash to become a ranting voice of the reactionary right.www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au
...Quadrant was born of the Cold War, in 1956. It was founded by Richard Krygier, a Polish refugee fleeing Nazism and communism. As recorded in detail by historian Cassandra Pybus in her book about its first editor, The Devil and James McAuley, much of Quadrant’s funding came from a US Central Intelligence Agency front organisation.
“Quadrant was one of 20 magazines the Congress for Cultural Freedom established in Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia,” Pybus wrote. “On advice from Bob Santamaria, Australia’s most virulent anti-communist campaigner, Krygier chose James McAuley as editor.”
More interesting than the simple fact of the CIA’s funding during McAuley’s 11-year tenure was its influence on the magazine. In Pybus’s version of events, the CIA was a force for moderation, its paymasters constantly pushing for more liberal voices in Quadrant and less of the likes of Santamaria. And Krygier and McAuley pushed back.
“The whole point of the covert operation was subtlety; to win over the left-leaning intellectuals to the American position, not further alienate them,” Pybus wrote...
Quadrant? Is that the online conservative mouthpiece that once wished through insinuation that the ABC's Q & A program be bombed?
Is this also the same Quadrant that was set up with CIA funding during the Cold War?
It's a point of view that Quadrant are pushing. That's fair enough on its own but I don't know that I'd trust them as far as I could throw them though.
That is a figure of speech, by the way. Not a threat!!
While we teach students that much of history is contested we also try to teach students to consider the empirical evidence in deciding the strength of a historical argument. Based on the evidence in relation to Dark Emu, Sutton and Walshe's arguments are far stronger than Pascoe's. Pascoe's 'Dark Emu' is not a scholarly work and he himself is no professional, experienced qualified anthropologist or archaeologist like Sutton and Walshe are.No argument, being aware there is more than one point of view is a must these days,
Pure fantasy.
Apparently, denial is strong in this one. Perhaps his last name is Bolt?You think the pottery is fantasy?
Yep, they're the same c***s.Quadrant? Is that the online conservative mouthpiece that once wished through insinuation that the ABC's Q & A program be bombed?
Is this also the same Quadrant that was set up with CIA funding during the Cold War?
It's a point of view that Quadrant are pushing. That's fair enough on its own but I don't know that I'd trust them as far as I could throw them though.
That is a figure of speech, by the way. Not a threat!!
3000 year old pottery found in QLD. Andrew Bolt is going to be tearing his hair out trying to deny this.
"The Walmbaar Aboriginal Corporation chairperson, Kenneth McLean, is a Dingaal clan member and traditional owner of the group of islands on which the pottery was unearthed.
“For our elders Jiigurru was always a sacred place,” McLean said. “It was always a place of trading and ceremony.”
James Cook University distinguished professor Sean Ulm, who co-led the dig alongside Monash University’s Prof Ian McNiven and with the Dingaal and Ngurrumungu communities, says its finds not only overturn notions about Aboriginal people and pottery but a number of “very common tropes” about Indigenous Australians.
One is that they were all isolated from the rest of the world. Another regards the simplicity of Aboriginal watercraft.
The chain of islands of Jiigurru – of which the 10 square kilometre Lizard Island is the largest – surround a lagoon about 33km off Cape Flattery.
The 2.4-metre deep dig unearthed evidence of continuous occupation going back more than 6,000 years on the islands, cut off from the mainland by sea level rise at least 10,000 years ago."
That's odd about the link. This one worksYour link works but there's no story.
The pottery could be from somewhere else and left there which is what the archaeologists are still trying to determine. Another has questioned why they even needed pottery since large shells with naturally occurring handles served the same purpose and were available throughout the Cape York area.
Pure fantasy.
Any evidence of ancient pottery on the mainland?3000 year old pottery found in QLD. Andrew Bolt is going to be tearing his hair out trying to deny this.
"The Walmbaar Aboriginal Corporation chairperson, Kenneth McLean, is a Dingaal clan member and traditional owner of the group of islands on which the pottery was unearthed.
“For our elders Jiigurru was always a sacred place,” McLean said. “It was always a place of trading and ceremony.”
James Cook University distinguished professor Sean Ulm, who co-led the dig alongside Monash University’s Prof Ian McNiven and with the Dingaal and Ngurrumungu communities, says its finds not only overturn notions about Aboriginal people and pottery but a number of “very common tropes” about Indigenous Australians.
One is that they were all isolated from the rest of the world. Another regards the simplicity of Aboriginal watercraft.
The chain of islands of Jiigurru – of which the 10 square kilometre Lizard Island is the largest – surround a lagoon about 33km off Cape Flattery.
The 2.4-metre deep dig unearthed evidence of continuous occupation going back more than 6,000 years on the islands, cut off from the mainland by sea level rise at least 10,000 years ago."
Maybe the fantasy was a completely backwards people that needed to be colonised to save them, one of those narratives soothed the ruling groups conscience as they nicked all their s**tPure fantasy.
Don't think so, there is evidence of pottery over a 1000 year span and not the tell tale signs of Lapita, quite possible they absorbed some tech through tradeAny evidence of ancient pottery on the mainland?
Well it makes sense the Aboriginal people may not have needed the pottery due to the availability of natural alternatives like large shells, although these things would have been less available on the mainland, especially in inland areas. So one might expect a use for pottery in those areas to be more likely.Don't think so, there is evidence of pottery over a 1000 year span and not the tell tale signs of Lapita, quite possible they absorbed some tech through trade
This article did note that they didn't have much use for pottery, maybe why it didn't spread far
https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2024-04-10/aboriginal-pottery-jiigurru-lizard-island/103681662
"You need pottery to store things. You need pottery to cook [...] Aboriginal people all along that Cape York Peninsula coastline had no need to make pottery because they had big baler shells and big clam shells, which serve exactly the same purpose," Professor Wallis said."
The article and finding from this dig weren't suggesting pottery was widespread across the continentWell it makes sense the Aboriginal people may not have needed the pottery due to the availability of natural alternatives like large shells, although these things would have been less available on the mainland, especially in inland areas. So one might expect a use for pottery in those areas to be more likely.