Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And not one confirmed as relating to the vaccine? Just happened "at some point after"? How many were cookers just reporting random stuff to mess with the numbers?We also haven't mentioned "a further 1,724 reports had an ‘other reaction’ listed that did not meet one of the 64 adverse reaction types. The most common of these were dizziness (1.9 per 100,000 doses), shingles (1.5 per 100,000 doses), and tinnitus (1.5 per 100,000 doses)."
It’s not serious compared to hospitals running out of oxygen, being overrun and people dying in the streetsYou are the one battling semantics if you don't think an extra 6000 people presenting to ED or 968 admitted to hospital (57% of total reports), 3000 assessed by a GP and 500 isn't serious.
For the very reason people can report more than one reaction, the 73% quoted by you means nothing and is and is a reason it is not used in any meaningful analysis. Some of these reactions may have lead to the 40 deaths that were actively identified through data linkage.
Conveniently you ignore the 1480 reports of chest pain against one for normal vaccination and the worrying increased rates of myocarditis and pericarditis diagnosed. The relevant analysis looks at age groups most affected and the highly increased rates for particular age groups.
Also it's dishonest to include reactions reported for adverse events following immunisation for 2021, without comparing to other reactions reported for AEFI from all other immunisations in 2021. There was no scare campaign, any experts pointing out worrying safety signals were censored and data from the FDA, TGA and the WAVSS has been carefully protected from public knowledge.
View attachment 1663884
A quote taken directly from the government report under Figure 10. "Rates of the five most frequently reported reactions following COVID-19 vaccination (any brand) in 2021", to which you are really now showing your ignorance and lack of understanding of, or just straight out trolling.And not one confirmed as relating to the vaccine? Just happened "at some point after"? How many were cookers just reporting random stuff to mess with the numbers?
We know from their telegram channels that the cookers were claiming to have reported random reactions, and encouraging others to do the same.A quote taken directly from the government report under Figure 10. "Rates of the five most frequently reported reactions following COVID-19 vaccination (any brand) in 2021", to which you are really now showing your ignorance and lack of understanding of, or just straight out trolling.
It doesn't say not one confirmed as relating to the vaccine, only these were 'other reactions' listed that did not meet one of the 64 reaction types.
Shingles is a common adverse event following covid, reported in large numbers on the DAEN site run by the TGA. It is not something you fake and as these reports were after presenting to EDs, hospitals, GPs or nurses, then verified or confirmed by WAVSS or an expert committee convened by them.
But now you're calling people getting vaccinations, cookers reporting random stuff if they have adverse events?
Which never happened at all in India in 2020 when with the serious variant of covid rampant there was almost no increase in excess deaths.It’s not serious compared to hospitals running out of oxygen, being overrun and people dying in the streets
What the fk are you talking about? Telegram channels??We know from their telegram channels that the cookers were claiming to have reported random reactions, and encouraging others to do the same.
I still don't trust your interpretation or quotes.
So if you’re going to go variant by variant then I suppose you can look at Northern Italy for the earlier variantWhich never happened at all in India in 2020 when with the serious variant of covid rampant there was almost no increase in excess deaths.
But it happened in 2021, when between May and July in in two states, there was a sharp increase in people needing hospitilisation and oxygen. Did not happen in other states that had over 280,000,000 people.
maybe to warn the young people of the risks so they could make informed decisions?
No it's not and that is why after getting all the reports of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) the, Western Australia’s Vaccine Safety Advisory Committee (WAVSAC) met 31 times in 2021 (up from twice any other year), then "in May 2021 the WAVSAC convened a specialist sub-group, the Expert Clinical Review Group (ECRG), to individually review WAVSS reports which required specialist assessment. The ECRG met 34 times in 2021 and reviewed 849 WAVSS reports.”"Following" is not "causation".
in May 2021 the WAVSAC convened a specialist sub-group, the Expert Clinical Review Group (ECRG), to individually review WAVSS reports which required specialist assessment. The ECRG met 34 times in 2021 and reviewed 849 WAVSS reports.”
Nothing to do with variants, except that was the worst but large areas of India in at least 6 States did extremely well in managing in 2020 with therapeutics treatments.So if you’re going to go variant by variant then I suppose you can look at Northern Italy for the earlier variant
I mean there’s evidence everywhere
GPs will follow TGA advice, and with the 'provisional approval' the TGA gave, they are responsible for evaluating information including Pfizer trial data which were just released through FOA requests and had many red flags, and monitor safety signals both in Australia and the rest of the world.Book an appointment with your GP to discuss any concerns or information relevant to your specific situation. I believe that was the health advice for anyone with concerns or wanting further information.
Because, as we've seen well illustrated by you, most people simply are not equipped or sufficiently educated to interpret and dispense health information for themselves let alone anyone else.
Seems the FDA has now removed authorisation for Phizer and Moderna jabs in the US.
The monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized
This action includes authorizing the current bivalent vaccines (original and omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains) to be used for all doses
Everything to do with variants. Early on isolating was an effective tool but once the more transmissible variants came to be that approach without vaccines was proven ineffective (ie. what worked in India in 2020 no longer worked in 2021)Nothing to do with variants, except that was the worst but large areas of India in at least 6 States did extremely well in managing in 2020 with therapeutics treatments.
Actual evidence is published in the BMJ with records of deaths and excess deaths in different Indian States in 2020 and 2021, linked a few pages back.
India with huge numbers of people and overcrowding didn't isolate and didn't have excess deaths in 2020, as published in the BMJ.Everything to do with variants. Early on isolating was an effective tool but once the more transmissible variants came to be that approach without vaccines was proven ineffective (ie. what worked in India in 2020 no longer worked in 2021)
India with huge numbers of people and overcrowding didn't isolate and didn't have excess deaths in 2020, as published in the BMJ.
What worked in India in 2020 was still working in India in 2021 in the States that were using it, again as shown in the published BMJ data.
That what I posted!Again, you're not as smart as you think you are, in the very quote you posted it explains this;
That what I posted!
What do you think it means?
Or do you have to go and consult someone saying something somewhere on Telegram?
Seems the FDA has now removed authorisation for Phizer and Moderna jabs in the US.
Or do you have to go and consult someone saying something somewhere on Telegram?
It was your link that I've already replied to in detail, but published in the Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2022 May; 106(5): 1507–1510.Three New Estimates of India’s All-Cause Excess Mortality during the COVID-19 Pandemic
India lacks an authoritative estimate of the death toll from the COVID-19 pandemic. We report excess mortality estimates from three different data sources from the pandemic’s start through June 2021. Estimating COVID-deaths with statistical confidence may prove elusive. But all estimates suggest...cgdev.org
Where's your BMJ link for the crowd to make their own assessment as to whether you've fully and accurately interpreted and quoted the data?
The joys of you continually misrepresenting things, is that at no point should anyone trust a single thing you say to be accurate.
India with huge numbers of people and overcrowding didn't isolate and didn't have excess deaths in 2020, as published in the BMJ.
What worked in India in 2020 was still working in India in 2021 in the States that were using it, again as shown in the published BMJ data.
Now you just inventing stuff!No you posted this;
Which is very different to them removing authorisation for the now superceded monovalent vaccine, given there's a newer bivalent vaccine available.
Your version is inaccurate and misrepresents what the FDA very specifically, and very clearly stated.
I've drawn no conclusions but pointed out facts.So you've drawn the conclusion that 2020 was nothing to see here and that 2021 saw a spike due to vaccines, to be clear?