So How Dangerous is COVID Really?

Remove this Banner Ad

We also haven't mentioned "a further 1,724 reports had an ‘other reaction’ listed that did not meet one of the 64 adverse reaction types. The most common of these were dizziness (1.9 per 100,000 doses), shingles (1.5 per 100,000 doses), and tinnitus (1.5 per 100,000 doses)."
And not one confirmed as relating to the vaccine? Just happened "at some point after"? How many were cookers just reporting random stuff to mess with the numbers?
 
You are the one battling semantics if you don't think an extra 6000 people presenting to ED or 968 admitted to hospital (57% of total reports), 3000 assessed by a GP and 500 isn't serious.

For the very reason people can report more than one reaction, the 73% quoted by you means nothing and is and is a reason it is not used in any meaningful analysis. Some of these reactions may have lead to the 40 deaths that were actively identified through data linkage.

Conveniently you ignore the 1480 reports of chest pain against one for normal vaccination and the worrying increased rates of myocarditis and pericarditis diagnosed. The relevant analysis looks at age groups most affected and the highly increased rates for particular age groups.

Also it's dishonest to include reactions reported for adverse events following immunisation for 2021, without comparing to other reactions reported for AEFI from all other immunisations in 2021. There was no scare campaign, any experts pointing out worrying safety signals were censored and data from the FDA, TGA and the WAVSS has been carefully protected from public knowledge.



View attachment 1663884
It’s not serious compared to hospitals running out of oxygen, being overrun and people dying in the streets
 

Log in to remove this ad.

And not one confirmed as relating to the vaccine? Just happened "at some point after"? How many were cookers just reporting random stuff to mess with the numbers?
A quote taken directly from the government report under Figure 10. "Rates of the five most frequently reported reactions following COVID-19 vaccination (any brand) in 2021", to which you are really now showing your ignorance and lack of understanding of, or just straight out trolling.

It doesn't say not one confirmed as relating to the vaccine, only these were 'other reactions' listed that did not meet one of the 64 reaction types.

Shingles is a common adverse event following covid, reported in large numbers on the DAEN site run by the TGA. It is not something you fake and as these reports were after presenting to EDs, hospitals, GPs or nurses, then verified or confirmed by WAVSS or an expert committee convened by them.

But now you're calling people getting vaccinations, cookers reporting random stuff if they have adverse events?
 
A quote taken directly from the government report under Figure 10. "Rates of the five most frequently reported reactions following COVID-19 vaccination (any brand) in 2021", to which you are really now showing your ignorance and lack of understanding of, or just straight out trolling.

It doesn't say not one confirmed as relating to the vaccine, only these were 'other reactions' listed that did not meet one of the 64 reaction types.

Shingles is a common adverse event following covid, reported in large numbers on the DAEN site run by the TGA. It is not something you fake and as these reports were after presenting to EDs, hospitals, GPs or nurses, then verified or confirmed by WAVSS or an expert committee convened by them.

But now you're calling people getting vaccinations, cookers reporting random stuff if they have adverse events?
We know from their telegram channels that the cookers were claiming to have reported random reactions, and encouraging others to do the same.

I still don't trust your interpretation or quotes.
 
It’s not serious compared to hospitals running out of oxygen, being overrun and people dying in the streets
Which never happened at all in India in 2020 when with the serious variant of covid rampant there was almost no increase in excess deaths.

But it happened in 2021, when between May and July in in two states, there was a sharp increase in people needing hospitilisation and oxygen. Did not happen in other states that had over 280,000,000 people.
 
We know from their telegram channels that the cookers were claiming to have reported random reactions, and encouraging others to do the same.

I still don't trust your interpretation or quotes.
What the fk are you talking about? Telegram channels??

This is official verified government data from WAVSS that I'm direct quoting from.

But you want to trust some random telegram channels.

Who's the real "cooker"?
 
Which never happened at all in India in 2020 when with the serious variant of covid rampant there was almost no increase in excess deaths.

But it happened in 2021, when between May and July in in two states, there was a sharp increase in people needing hospitilisation and oxygen. Did not happen in other states that had over 280,000,000 people.
So if you’re going to go variant by variant then I suppose you can look at Northern Italy for the earlier variant

I mean there’s evidence everywhere
 
A quote taken directly from the government report under Figure 10. "Rates of the five most frequently reported reactions following COVID-19 vaccination (any brand) in 2021"
"Following" is not "causation".
 
maybe to warn the young people of the risks so they could make informed decisions?

Book an appointment with your GP to discuss any concerns or information relevant to your specific situation. I believe that was the health advice for anyone with concerns or wanting further information.

Because, as we've seen well illustrated by you, most people simply are not equipped or sufficiently educated to interpret and dispense health information for themselves let alone anyone else.
 
"Following" is not "causation".
No it's not and that is why after getting all the reports of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) the, Western Australia’s Vaccine Safety Advisory Committee (WAVSAC) met 31 times in 2021 (up from twice any other year), then "in May 2021 the WAVSAC convened a specialist sub-group, the Expert Clinical Review Group (ECRG), to individually review WAVSS reports which required specialist assessment. The ECRG met 34 times in 2021 and reviewed 849 WAVSS reports.”

They then reported on confirmed cases causally linked to the covid vaccinations.
 
in May 2021 the WAVSAC convened a specialist sub-group, the Expert Clinical Review Group (ECRG), to individually review WAVSS reports which required specialist assessment. The ECRG met 34 times in 2021 and reviewed 849 WAVSS reports.”

It's almost like the COVID vaccines were the most scrutinised and monitored vaccines ever made...
 
So if you’re going to go variant by variant then I suppose you can look at Northern Italy for the earlier variant

I mean there’s evidence everywhere
Nothing to do with variants, except that was the worst but large areas of India in at least 6 States did extremely well in managing in 2020 with therapeutics treatments.

Actual evidence is published in the BMJ with records of deaths and excess deaths in different Indian States in 2020 and 2021, linked a few pages back.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Book an appointment with your GP to discuss any concerns or information relevant to your specific situation. I believe that was the health advice for anyone with concerns or wanting further information.

Because, as we've seen well illustrated by you, most people simply are not equipped or sufficiently educated to interpret and dispense health information for themselves let alone anyone else.
GPs will follow TGA advice, and with the 'provisional approval' the TGA gave, they are responsible for evaluating information including Pfizer trial data which were just released through FOA requests and had many red flags, and monitor safety signals both in Australia and the rest of the world.

But if the TGA don't release particular warnings for particular ages, sex, manufacturers then information to make an informed decision on the risks is missing.

Seems the FDA has now removed authorisation for Phizer and Moderna jabs in the US.

The monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized for use in the United States.

This action includes authorizing the current bivalent vaccines (original and omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains) to be used for all doses administered to individuals 6 months of age and older, including for an additional dose or doses for certain populations.

Most individuals who have already received a single dose of the bivalent vaccine are not currently eligible for another dose. We intend to make decisions about future vaccination after receiving recommendations on the fall strain composition at an FDA advisory committee in June.

 
Seems the FDA has now removed authorisation for Phizer and Moderna jabs in the US.

Again, you're not as smart as you think you are, in the very quote you posted it explains this;

The monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized

This action includes authorizing the current bivalent vaccines (original and omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains) to be used for all doses
 
Nothing to do with variants, except that was the worst but large areas of India in at least 6 States did extremely well in managing in 2020 with therapeutics treatments.

Actual evidence is published in the BMJ with records of deaths and excess deaths in different Indian States in 2020 and 2021, linked a few pages back.
Everything to do with variants. Early on isolating was an effective tool but once the more transmissible variants came to be that approach without vaccines was proven ineffective (ie. what worked in India in 2020 no longer worked in 2021)
 
Everything to do with variants. Early on isolating was an effective tool but once the more transmissible variants came to be that approach without vaccines was proven ineffective (ie. what worked in India in 2020 no longer worked in 2021)
India with huge numbers of people and overcrowding didn't isolate and didn't have excess deaths in 2020, as published in the BMJ.

What worked in India in 2020 was still working in India in 2021 in the States that were using it, again as shown in the published BMJ data.
 
India with huge numbers of people and overcrowding didn't isolate and didn't have excess deaths in 2020, as published in the BMJ.

What worked in India in 2020 was still working in India in 2021 in the States that were using it, again as shown in the published BMJ data.


Where's your BMJ link for the crowd to make their own assessment as to whether you've fully and accurately interpreted and quoted the data?

The joys of you continually misrepresenting things, is that at no point should anyone trust a single thing you say to be accurate.
 
That what I posted!

What do you think it means?

Or do you have to go and consult someone saying something somewhere on Telegram?

No you posted this;

Seems the FDA has now removed authorisation for Phizer and Moderna jabs in the US.

Which is very different to them removing authorisation for the now superceded monovalent vaccine, given there's a newer bivalent vaccine available.

Your version is inaccurate and misrepresents what the FDA very specifically, and very clearly stated.
 

Where's your BMJ link for the crowd to make their own assessment as to whether you've fully and accurately interpreted and quoted the data?

The joys of you continually misrepresenting things, is that at no point should anyone trust a single thing you say to be accurate.
It was your link that I've already replied to in detail, but published in the Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2022 May; 106(5): 1507–1510.

Preliminary Analysis of Excess Mortality in India During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Perhaps you should have read it first, along with a local news paper report I posted.

 
India with huge numbers of people and overcrowding didn't isolate and didn't have excess deaths in 2020, as published in the BMJ.

What worked in India in 2020 was still working in India in 2021 in the States that were using it, again as shown in the published BMJ data.

So you've drawn the conclusion that 2020 was nothing to see here and that 2021 saw a spike due to vaccines, to be clear?
 
No you posted this;

Which is very different to them removing authorisation for the now superceded monovalent vaccine, given there's a newer bivalent vaccine available.

Your version is inaccurate and misrepresents what the FDA very specifically, and very clearly stated.
Now you just inventing stuff!

You know they are very different products don't you?

Every covid vaccine product on the US market has now had authorisation for use removed, except for the bivalent product.

It's only been available in Australia for general use since April and would be like Australia removing almost all of available their available covid - 19 jabs.

"Superceded" LOL. Or were there too many safety issues to keep ignoring with the other products?

It's only been tested on 8 mice and a few hundred people, investigational bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in individuals greater than 55 years of age, a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Cleveland Clinic Health System which found "an overall modest protective effect of the bivalent vaccine booster against COVID-19, among working-aged adults."

Made some interesting comments that in that study that for their working age cohort they've been reporting on since 16 December 2020, the effects of the Omicron variant was so mild "There were too few severe illnesses for the study to be able to determine if the vaccine decreased severity of illness."

They also found the "that the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19. This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19."

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top