- Banned
- #76
Backfire Dusty is back baby! Read this and weep.
- Thread starter Aristotle Pickett
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Yep played well was asking more about how you were after the loss. No remotes lodged in TV?
- Banned
- #78
“gREaTeSt FiNaLz PlAyAz EvA bItChEzz!!”
Bont2Bruce
At the Destination Club
- Mar 15, 2012
- 10,927
- 25,785
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Footscray, Melbourne City
Josh Jenkins would even have been proud of the joe-the-goose goal that pads out those stats too.
Those stats are only marginally better then steve johnsons finals stats and he played a lot more and a third of them without a working leg.
now lets watch dustys finals stats deteriorate as he starts playing finals in his declining years. Although he might get lucky and not play anymore if richmond returns to ninthmond.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 22,361
- 32,260
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #81
I knew it would be a close game, I'm dissapointed that the review guy chose to change the rules and protocols that he is bound by.
- Sep 3, 2019
- 17,421
- 50,641
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Id be more disappointed my full forward couldnt kick that goal without it needing to be reviewed
- Oct 19, 2020
- 22,361
- 32,260
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #83
I agree with Gerard Whately and Gerard Healy who just said if the ball is above the post, then it should be umpires call which makes total sense.
No if its above the post its a point. Thats always been how it works for like forever.
davywap
Norm Smith Medallist
Must hurt knowing Dusty the spud made the pussies his bitches in the 2020 GF
davywap
Norm Smith Medallist
- Oct 19, 2020
- 22,361
- 32,260
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #88
Above the post line ,not the post.
Richmond supporters want a new rule installed and applied retroactively. If you kick it above the goal posts its a goal no matter how accurate.
- Banned
- #90
- Oct 19, 2020
- 22,361
- 32,260
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #91
It is if the goal umpire calls it a goal.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 22,361
- 32,260
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #92
Well we already know he didn't kick more than 7 goals in that game because has never done it.Meh, Hawkins the spud rearranged your guts in 2011.
Jack: "See Dustin, if I take this chopstick and stab it into your eyeball like so..."
Dusty (now half-blind); "Gaah! My eye! It's been liminerated!!"
Jack: "That's right Dustin. Your eyeball, just like our chances this year. Eliminated"
Dusty: "I... I see"
Jack. "Not with your new sense of depth-perception, Dustin"
- Jul 22, 2013
- 18,822
- 27,484
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Give it up you pitiful heck ing sook.
Lynch knew he'd butchered it. The grossly OUT of position goal umpire didn't even look up until after the ball was past. He heck ed up. And the review overturned his blind guess, as it should.
Sore losers really are the piss weakest form of life.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 22,361
- 32,260
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #95
Looks like someone is smashed drunk before 9pm again.
- Sep 3, 2019
- 17,421
- 50,641
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Guilty.
- Banned
- #97
Meh, we also know he’s still playing finals unlike Gropin Martin.
- Jul 22, 2013
- 18,822
- 27,484
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Possibly true.
But drunk as a lord I'll never be as stupid as you are sober.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 22,361
- 32,260
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- #99
Some might call you a pseudo-intellectual.
- Banned
- #100
