- Mar 19, 2020
- 12,700
- 39,396
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Who posted any "neo-nazi sh*t"
Ridiculous
Malifice did a few times. I reported it of course
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who posted any "neo-nazi sh*t"
Ridiculous
Exactly, we're not Nazis so don't know anything about their iconographyWell I, like other I assume, are probably not all over neo-Nazi iconography (outside the Swastika of course), therefore weren't aware?
Ludicrous, I've never lost an argument with Malifice in my life and ahve never reported anything for "losing an argument". Malifice continually dragged threads into the dirt with side tracks and anti-science rhetoric based of pharma advertising documents. The shameless bias you and other moderators hold on this site is truly sickening.Oh yes, reporting when you lose an argument and requesting a mod be banned is usually rejected
Oh yes, reporting when you lose an argument and requesting a mod be banned is usually rejected
Funny thing is I said nazi comments were not welcome.With people who post neo-Nazi sh*t? Of course we don't. Abso-flippin-lutely we don't.
Apart from you re-posting a tweet from a neo-Nazi account?Funny thing is I said nazi comments were not welcome.
Great selective quoting.
Funny thing is I said nazi comments were not welcome.
Great selective quoting.
It's an important distinction don't you think? If the rule says no anti vaccine stuff, are we talking the NT ministers definition that even having sympathy for a person who is against mandates is anti vaccine? Or is there some form of nuance allowedWhy would you think that specifically? What in any of my posts, or the rules, pointed to that?
To clear this up as it is in public:How is
"Well Muslin girls arnt dieing"
when discussing face masks a natural course of discussion?
Muslim female oppression isnt somethiong to be joked about.. ever. Well so I thought