Preview 2024 Best 22 Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Im saying Cox could go forward when Jackson is rucking if Draper rotates onto the second tall in the backline. Allowing us to always have three talls forward.
What Purple Jesus said. I highly doubt it.

I get the fascination of Cox forward, but we don't need it anymore and there's no way we priortise playing Draper over Chapman say, just so Cox can play 5 minutes forward per game.
 
What Purple Jesus said. I highly doubt it.

I get the fascination of Cox forward, but we don't need it anymore and there's no way we priortise playing Draper over Chapman say, just so Cox can play 5 minutes forward per game.
Draper will push Hughes out. Guy can play tall or small.
Running, evasive skills and can kick.
It’s like we cloned Chappy, and maybe Aish will again be a utility?
 
Draper will push Hughes out. Guy can play tall or small.
Running, evasive skills and can kick.
It’s like we cloned Chappy, and maybe Aish will again be a utility?
Hughes isn't B22 though. Draper has to push one of the KPDs or Ryan out when Cox comes back - good luck.

Whilst he moves well, I don't think he moves as well as 180cm guys so Clark, Aish etc aren't in danger.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Hughes isn't B22 though. Draper has to push one of the KPDs or Ryan out when Cox comes back - good luck.

Whilst he moves well, I don't think he moves as well as 180cm guys so Clark, Aish etc aren't in danger.
Walker Pearce Ryan
Clark Cox Chapman
Bench Aish
That’s our 7 backs, Draper gets a look if they move Chapman to a wing, but I feel like that would be a next year thing given his injuries.
 
Available Best 22 Post-Derby Loss.



Backline
Walker, Pearce, Draper
Clark, Ryan, Chapman

- Chapman returns finally and swaps in for Hughes. Aish moves to interchange for flexibility. Only change to this will be if/when Cox returns later this season, until then it's valuable experience for Draper.

Midfield
Darcy, Serong, Young
Sharp, Fyfe, Brayshaw

- Core four of Darcy/Young/Serong/Brayshaw lead here. Sharp on the wing, other side has plenty of options between Banfield, Aish, Chapman & Brayshaw.

Forward
Switkowski, Treacy, Johnson
Jackson, Taberner, Sturt

- Amiss swaps in for Taberner post-concussion after the next game but gives the JJJ core. Sturt makes for a solid 3rd option and pressures well. Johnson is one I wouldn't mind see more of at HFF - good size, mark and long kicking. Would love to see that side of his game develop, spotting up inside fifty targets as he builds for future midfield time.

Interchange
Banfield, Aish, Brodie, Fredrick

- JOM over Brodie is criminal and has gone far enough. Fredick returns to create havok with his speed & x-factor. Aish & Banfield provide rotation options across the ground.


Sub
Walters/Simpson

- Sub role might keep Walters fresh, because when he's on (which is get rarer these days sadly :( ) he's a genuine match winner. Simpson's the one I want to see as the sub. Body's still getting used to the physically of the AFL, but he's so explosive and damaging player. Put that against tired opponents and limited minutes to reduce the wear on the body? Perfect sub candiate IMO
 
Available Best 22 Post-Derby Loss.



Backline
Walker, Pearce, Draper
Clark, Ryan, Chapman

- Chapman returns finally and swaps in for Hughes. Aish moves to interchange for flexibility. Only change to this will be if/when Cox returns later this season, until then it's valuable experience for Draper.

Midfield
Darcy, Serong, Young
Sharp, Fyfe, Brayshaw

- Core four of Darcy/Young/Serong/Brayshaw lead here. Sharp on the wing, other side has plenty of options between Banfield, Aish, Chapman & Brayshaw.

Forward
Switkowski, Treacy, Johnson
Jackson, Taberner, Sturt

- Amiss swaps in for Taberner post-concussion after the next game but gives the JJJ core. Sturt makes for a solid 3rd option and pressures well. Johnson is one I wouldn't mind see more of at HFF - good size, mark and long kicking. Would love to see that side of his game develop, spotting up inside fifty targets as he builds for future midfield time.

Interchange
Banfield, Aish, Brodie, Fredrick

- JOM over Brodie is criminal and has gone far enough. Fredick returns to create havok with his speed & x-factor. Aish & Banfield provide rotation options across the ground.


Sub
Walters/Simpson

- Sub role might keep Walters fresh, because when he's on (which is get rarer these days sadly :( ) he's a genuine match winner. Simpson's the one I want to see as the sub. Body's still getting used to the physically of the AFL, but he's so explosive and damaging player. Put that against tired opponents and limited minutes to reduce the wear on the body? Perfect sub candiate IMO
That midfield got smashed and has done for years. It is not big enough or skillful enough. Brayshaw and Serong were thrown around like they were being chucked out of the cot
 
Ryan Pearce Walker
Clark Cox Chapman
Banners Fyfe Sharp
Freddy Treacy Simpson
Emmett Amiss Jackson

Darcy Serong Young.

Brayshaw Aish Johnson JOM.

Sub: Brodie.

Notes: We are only 2 inclusions away (Cox for Walters, and Amiss for Voss) from having our best 22 available IMO. As much as I hate to admit it, the Darcy/Jackson question mark still remains. They have 3 or 4 games to work out how to play together. I honestly don't think Walters is best 22 anymore.
 
Ryan Pearce Walker
Clark Cox Chapman
Banners Fyfe Sharp
Freddy Treacy Simpson
Emmett Amiss Jackson

Darcy Serong Young.

Brayshaw Aish Johnson JOM.

Sub: Brodie.

Notes: We are only 2 inclusions away (Cox for Walters, and Amiss for Voss) from having our best 22 available IMO. As much as I hate to admit it, the Darcy/Jackson question mark still remains. They have 3 or 4 games to work out how to play together. I honestly don't think Walters is best 22 anymore.
Why does the Darcy Jackson question mark remain. I thought Saturday night showed it does work, as it did last season.
I thought it worked very well. It also seemed to give Treacy more room to move.
Walters... I thought , looking live at the game Saturday night , he didn't play well. I watched the replay and it changed my mind. Apart from his silly attempts to mark, and give away two free, he played a very strong part for the team.His lat attempt to mark when both Jackson and Treacy were in postions to fly was criminal. His spot should have been front and centre to the contest.
I think Brodies number has been stamped.I think that other shave take the spot that MAY hav ebeeb there.
He will have to have a few real stand out games for Peel, and then maybe rely on an injury or two.
 
I think the dominance of Fyfe on the weekend can be attributed partly to Darcy in the ruck. Other part being having overall confidence in his role and body.

Jackson around the ground playing ruck might be better but hitouts to advantage in centre or throw ins is still where Darcy excels. Doesn't hurt to have him as a target kicking down the line from defense.
 
Why does the Darcy Jackson question mark remain. I thought Saturday night showed it does work, as it did last season.
I thought it worked very well. It also seemed to give Treacy more room to move.
Walters... I thought , looking live at the game Saturday night , he didn't play well. I watched the replay and it changed my mind. Apart from his silly attempts to mark, and give away two free, he played a very strong part for the team.His lat attempt to mark when both Jackson and Treacy were in postions to fly was criminal. His spot should have been front and centre to the contest.
I think Brodies number has been stamped.I think that other shave take the spot that MAY hav ebeeb there.
He will have to have a few real stand out games for Peel, and then maybe rely on an injury or two.
Agree to disagree on Walters. I was also at the game (and watched the replay) and thought that he was generally fairly poor. His defensive efforts were not up to scratch and gave away 2 free kicks inside our forward 50 (One lost us a mark to Emmett and set shot from 40 out, directly in front) He kicked one goal in the last minute of the game.
Apart from one great game this year, he has had a bad year and would not be getting picked if his name was not Michael Walters.
 
Agree to disagree on Walters. I was also at the game (and watched the replay) and thought that he was generally fairly poor. His defensive efforts were not up to scratch and gave away 2 free kicks inside our forward 50 (One lost us a mark to Emmett and set shot from 40 out, directly in front) He kicked one goal in the last minute of the game.
Apart from one great game this year, he has had a bad year and would not be getting picked if his name was not Michael Walters.
Agree to disagree.
 
Agree to disagree on Walters. I was also at the game (and watched the replay) and thought that he was generally fairly poor. His defensive efforts were not up to scratch and gave away 2 free kicks inside our forward 50 (One lost us a mark to Emmett and set shot from 40 out, directly in front) He kicked one goal in the last minute of the game.
Apart from one great game this year, he has had a bad year and would not be getting picked if his name was not Michael Walters.

Walters is a very important on field leader for us that can't be replaced by whoever we would bring in. There was a moment in the final quarter (I think) right in front of us where Walters was on the wing with the ball coming out of defence, Jackson was 70 metres away up the ground. Walters turned and called Jackson up to the wing with him before calling for the kick, Jackson went up for the mark and Walters stayed down, crumbed and gave the hands to Jackson at ground level who ran on and set up a goal up the ground. All he gets on the stat sheet is 1 handball when in actual fact he literally single handedly set a very important goal up for us with his direction. He does stuff like that quite often
 
Agree to disagree on Walters. I was also at the game (and watched the replay) and thought that he was generally fairly poor. His defensive efforts were not up to scratch and gave away 2 free kicks inside our forward 50 (One lost us a mark to Emmett and set shot from 40 out, directly in front) He kicked one goal in the last minute of the game.
Apart from one great game this year, he has had a bad year and would not be getting picked if his name was not Michael Walters.
I think he would benefit from having a week off this week and not play for Peel even. He looks tired.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ryan Pearce Walker
Clark Cox Chapman
Banners Fyfe Sharp
Freddy Treacy Simpson
Emmett Amiss Jackson

Darcy Serong Young.

Brayshaw Aish Johnson JOM.

Sub: Brodie.

Notes: We are only 2 inclusions away (Cox for Walters, and Amiss for Voss) from having our best 22 available IMO. As much as I hate to admit it, the Darcy/Jackson question mark still remains. They have 3 or 4 games to work out how to play together. I honestly don't think Walters is best 22 anymore.
I'd have Switta in the team instead of O'Meara. I think Logmuir will want Cox forward a bit when he returns to keep Draper in the team. Perhaps I rate Draper more than most but I think he's been fantastic. I'm pretty sue Aish spent a bit of time on the wing for the first time this year last game. I'd rotate him there for short bursts to make the rotations work. Possibly Freddy could play a bit of wing too I like him on the wing in short bursts.
 
Is Hayden Young that goal kicking mid we've been screaming for?
 
Is Hayden Young that goal kicking mid we've been screaming for?
Sharp continues to get rewarded for his run and Johnson finally bobbed up for a goal as well, 4 goals from midfield is exactly what we need every game. Now we just need to do it against full strength Sydney.
 
Young being able to kick goals off either foot makes him a nightmare to plan for in forward stoppages. With Serong, Brayshaw, Sharp etc you just guard that right side so they can't swoop onto it and kick.

That Young can just finish, and Johnson can kick off both feet too, makes for a much more dangerous group.
 
Young being able to kick goals off either foot makes him a nightmare to plan for in forward stoppages. With Serong, Brayshaw, Sharp etc you just guard that right side so they can't swoop onto it and kick.

That Young can just finish, and Johnson can kick off both feet too, makes for a much more dangerous group.
Serong is reasonable off his left. At least a 5/10.
 
Johnson and Sharp seem to pop up more with scoring shots, both with 6-7 shots on goal this season. However I'm all aboard if Young gets the license to go for it 50-55 out.
When Johnson bulks up more and moves into the centre full time he's going to be an absolute weapon
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top