Good points. If parents can ‘discipline’ their kids then no need for the advert.
It was just unneccesary and probably unfounded in terms of causation. Mor danger of parents bullying their kids unnnecssarily
So chief, did you think the advert was a good advert?
Take the advert where the male child is pushing over a female child.
The inference is the male child needs behaviour altering in some way. We aren’t told how.
I just don’t see this kind of messaging as harmless. The child is already guilty of a future DV. Is the suggestion. Is this messaging...
We keep getting this narrative that ‘average blokes’ are threatened by public attempts. To curb DV and GV
Which seem to be failing spectacularly by the way
It’s just not
It’s frustration that for example the messaging doesn’t seem to be resonating, and some adverts are just well…bad
Let’s...
I strongly believe the related advertising campaigns have been poor.
The two which stand out are
The one suggesting young boys acting up are potential DV perpetrators and need to be adjusted/influenced
The one about sex consent which was too twee to actually use the word sex
The more you learn the more you laugh.
So on objection was the staduim would disrespect the cenotapph
Then you read the sewerage treatment plant right next to the cenotaph will need to be moved
A sewerage treatment plant
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.