- Mar 25, 2019
- 14,141
- 29,124
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Indeed. Hope nothing serious to any of the Hawks in the lead in to the season.All banter today aside
Feel for the bloke
Could be career over for old Noodles too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed. Hope nothing serious to any of the Hawks in the lead in to the season.All banter today aside
Feel for the bloke
Club just released it, out for season confirmed.They're guessing. Going for scans Monday. Could be half season. That position can be covered anyway.
If it was DeKoning I'd be more worried
Ollie more than likelyClub just released it, out for season confirmed.
Be interesting to see who takes his spot
Would they move Williams back?Club just released it, out for season confirmed.
Be interesting to see who takes his spot
This should be the absolute last resort imo. O.Hollands played as a HB to finish the year and is training their in the pre-season so seems like the logical replacement. We also have some other HBs in line for more game time/bigger role. Issue is obviously no one is going to be able to play that role Newman was to his level. Back to back finishes in our BnF says it all. Just rotten luck againWould they move Williams back?
The loss of Newman is a big blow. Rebounding back flankers are crucial in the modern game.
Personally Id actually like to see Elijah Hollands moved back there instead of his brother, think he's the best kick in the team by a considerable margin and reads the play well in terms of intercepting from the little game time we saw down back.Would they move Williams back?
The loss of Newman is a big blow. Rebounding back flankers are crucial in the modern game.
Left but I don't rate Blanck as high as other Hawthorn supporters anyway.Which one are you taking... left or right?View attachment 2205800
Recency bias.
Newcombe had a decent year in 2024.
Walsh started late and played 4 less games underdone.
If both were at their best Walsh is the more dangerous user IMO.
Yep, that was definitely an interesting opinion....I have zero issue with anyone holding the opinion that Walsh is better than Newcombe.
However, using 'more dangerous user' as the reasoning is an interesting one, considering Newcombe has a higher disposal efficiency, averages more clearances, more metres gained and a lot LESS turnovers when comparing both men's careers.
Walsh is an absolute butcher of the ball...but boy can he find it.I have zero issue with anyone holding the opinion that Walsh is better than Newcombe.
However, using 'more dangerous user' as the reasoning is an interesting one, considering Newcombe has a higher disposal efficiency, averages more clearances, more metres gained and a lot LESS turnovers when comparing both men's careers.
Just not that good. Solid, nothing better.Understand the scepticism but Fog provides the pressure and tenacity that allows the big boys to play their game. He is a very hard worker, invaluable for team chemistry.
Pitto is definitely hit and miss but he's our only back up ruckman and when he turns it on he can be a brute.
Ive openly acknowledged on BF that we need serious improvement across the board.
You made the point that Walsh is a quality contested ball winner despite not being number one in that role but Newcombe is the number one role because he’s number one in stats? It goes both ways in that he isn’t because that’s not the setup.Newcombe is the main inside midfielder when you look at the numbers - he was #1 for clearances and #1 for contested possessions at Hawthorn. It's not a slight on him it's just a different role to the one being played by Walsh for Carlton.
Mitchell had a great year in 2018 and deserved the Brownlow but I stand by my point that he was a stat padder for a lot of his time there. Running behind players to get a handball and then kicking it 15m sideways etc. Walsh over his career has been imo a far better runner and two-way mid than Mitchell over his own career. Not talking about a single year but overall.
You have presented your opinion on Newcombe/Walsh and that's fine. Not everyone has to agree and that's fine. And talking about growth left doesn't make much sense when both players would be expected to improve being young players. To say Newcombe has all this growth left and ignore Walsh's growth in his game makes very little sense.