NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

How long before Musk & Trump have a major rift?

  • Under one month

  • Under six months

  • Under one year

  • Under two years

  • Not happening, never!

  • Not until Musk is ready to seize the Presidency

Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is US Politics Pt 2

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary will be deleted and warnings issued, that includes mockery and trying to pass it off as a joke.

Play nice, please.
 
Last edited:
CM86 said:
2% - 5% chance that they were communicating together and sharing plans.


100% chance that there are links between these two men, in terms of service and where they've been stationed.



What do you think the chances are that they were planning this together?
Click to expand...
Id say 95-99% myself.

A country of hundreds of millions of people were 2 friends commit terror attacks hours apart.... I mean cmon
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Out of curiosity can you let me know what you take from the above passage?
Click to expand...
What I take from that, is that the on record statements align with available social media posting and other information found so far.



This could be completely incorrect, or there may be some inaccuracies, as is often the case with early reporting on major events.

Which is why we should read it, and take it for what it's worth.
With the knowledge of how inaccurate early reports can be.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Discussing 2 things at once does that.
Click to expand...
No.

I mean that when I ask you something, you don't really engage with it, and then you ask me something or talk about something else.
I respond to what you've posted, and I engage with it, and you move, again, to something else.


I asked you if you could point out a part of the article that you think is a lie, or is 'gaslighting'.
Each time I've asked you to substantiate your position, you move on to something else, or you ask me a new question.


It doesn't feel like a conversation, it feels like a game of cat and mouse.
 
CM86 said:
No.

I mean that when I ask you something, you don't really engage with it, and then you ask me something or talk about something else.
I respond to what you've posted, and I engage with it, and you move, again, to something else.


I asked you if you could point out a part of the article that you think is a lie, or is 'gaslighting'.
Each time I've asked you to substantiate your position, you move on to something else, or you ask me a new question.


It doesn't feel like a conversation, it feels like a game of cat and mouse.
Click to expand...
I pointed out the gaslighting. You just ignored it like a game of cat and mouse

You cant be a Trump supporter who is part of a entirely different political party who believes in non bi-partisan government. You get how you cant be both things at once yeah?

Why did you completely ignore his political affiliation as to suggest Facebook posts 4 years ago are more relevant then his current political position?
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Out of curiosity can you let me know what you take from the above passage?

Some unidentified person named Dean who has no surname at all says he liked Trump but all his records show he supports fringe political parties who hold Anti-Trump views...

Mofra ignored the second paragraph, just like you are
Click to expand...
What an I ignoring? The Facebook posts from his alias showing he was a Trump fan, or his account on a far right news site?

You've made a big assumption while arguing against assumptions.

Surely the fact that Trump tried to pin the issue on immigration while the perpetrator was a US citizen is relevant in a thread about US politics.
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
I pointed out the gaslighting. You just ignored it like a game of cat and mouse
Click to expand...
That's not true. I quite literally engaged with it, and asked you for a single example, more than once.


Quoted below.

CM86 said:
But if you put up a FoxNews article, I could at least list out what I disagree with and what parts I find misleading or untrue.

You're just making a broad claim, including ignoring things like the posts about Bolton.
Click to expand...
I don't know why you're unable to point out a single thing you think is a lie or 'gaslighting'.


GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
You cant be a Trump supporter who is part of a entirely different political party who believes in non bi-partisan government. You get how you cant be both things at once yeah?
Click to expand...
OK.

Yes or no.
Trump has recently made statements in regards to H1B visas, and giving citizenship status to graduates... that have caused a lot of anger and resentment from part of the MAGA case?
 
CM86 said:
That's not true. I quite literally engaged with it, and asked you for a single example, more than once.


Quoted below.


I don't know why you're unable to point out a single thing you think is a lie or 'gaslighting'.



OK.

Yes or no.
Trump has recently made statements in regards to H1B visas, and giving citizenship status to graduates... that have caused a lot of anger and resentment from part of the MAGA case?
Click to expand...
Irrelevant goal post move.

What evidence do you have that this is linked to the H1B Visas issue?
 
Mofra said:
What an I ignoring? The Facebook posts from his alias showing he was a Trump fan, or his account on a far right news site?

You've made a big assumption while arguing against assumptions.

Surely the fact that Trump tried to pin the issue on immigration while the perpetrator was a US citizen is relevant in a thread about US politics.
Click to expand...
You are ignoring his association with a different political institution completely.... Didnt even mention it once. zill had to bring it up for you
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Irrelevant goal post move.
Click to expand...
Don't be ridiculous.

GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
What evidence do you have that this is linked to the H1B Visas issue?
Click to expand...
None.
As I've already clearly explained to you, it's my assumptions based on following the MAGA split.

The reason I asked you such a simple "Yes/No" question, (which of course you avoided), was to gauge your level of understanding of the current situation.

If you'd said 'no', I would have taken some time to explain it to you, with supporting information.


But this is just a frustrating game of cat and mouse.
I'm not chasing you, so stop running from me.

Enjoy your day.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
You are ignoring his association with a different political institution completely.... Didnt even mention it once. zill had to bring it up for you
Click to expand...
The association could have been as simple as clicking a link.
You need to take all the information at hand to make a judgement, not just cherry pick one part.

I tend to ignore zill after his ridiculous "Trump might have been undercover when he was visiting Epstein" rubbish.
 
Mofra said:
The association could have been as simple as clicking a link.
You need to take all the information at hand to make a judgement, not just cherry pick one part.

I tend to ignore zill after his ridiculous "Trump might have been undercover when he was visiting Epstein" rubbish.
Click to expand...
You literally cherry picked one part. That's my issue ... Why all the focus on Facebook posts from 4 years ago

Do you think 4 year ago thought defined his thoughts today ?
 
CM86 said:
Wow.
Click to expand...
Seriously.
zill said:
No names of victims would be released, of course. Or people who cooperated. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if Trump was some kind of undercover operative, taking down Epstein's child sex trafficking ring from the inside.
Click to expand...

NWO/Illuminati - US politics - Pt 3

Here is US Politics Pt 2 Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.
www.bigfooty.com
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
You literally cherry picked one part. That's my issue ... Why all the focus on Facebook posts from 4 years ago

Do you think 4 year ago thought defined his thoughts today ?
Click to expand...
I listed more than one - and an article. And I just posted another article.
Facebook posts, and the interview with a family member, and his association with a far right news site.

3 is a bigger number than 1.
 
Mofra said:
I listed more than one - and an article. And I just posted another article.
Facebook posts, and the interview with a family member, and his association with a far right news site.

3 is a bigger number than 1.
Click to expand...
Yes

Dean. The man with no surname is the one I trust

Forget waiting for the FBI. We got Dean on the case
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
You are ignoring it.... You ignored that and chose the Trump link from 4 years ago.

Why is the political links from 4 years ago more important the the ones from this election?
Click to expand...


I don't think anyone was ignoring it.
It's a far-right political party. Which lines up with the rest of what is presented in the article.

You don't need to be defensive. Just engage with this as a discussion.

You have a view and a position on this, and a belief as to the reasoning and the motives.
Opposing information isn't an attack on you. It's just available information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

HitTheNailOnTheHead
Conspiracy Theory You have more chance of winning US lotto than drowning and yet the Obama and the Clinton chefs have both apparently drowned. What is going on?
Replies
12
Views
1K
LuvtheKangas
LuvtheKangas
HitTheNailOnTheHead
Conspiracy Theory KFC's Colonel Sanders Was A 33rd Degree Freemason
Replies
0
Views
302
HitTheNailOnTheHead
HitTheNailOnTheHead
Back
Top