NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

zill said:
I bet you can't find an article stating that Andrews remained on the scene until emergency services arrived.
Click to expand...

I don't have to find an article saying Andrews and his Wife remained on the scene after the crash, you have to find one where it claims they did not remain on the scene.

You're the one making the claim (unsupported) that it was a Hit and Run. Ergo, it's your job to prove it.

What we do know is Andrews immediately called 000 after the crash, and the police who attended the site got in trouble for failing to breathalyze the people present.

So ****ing someone was there for them to forget to breathalyze, and sure as shit if Dan Andrews wife (who was driving) had done a runner, they would have charged her with 'Failing to stop and render assistance after a crash'.

There are literally zero articles (including from Sky News) making any claims that Andrews (or his wife) did a runner.

Answer honestly, where are you getting the 'hit and run' angle from?
 
zill said:
Here is an article with a diagram of where the accident happened.

Click to expand...

There is no diagram in that article.

Just some cooker trying to claim that 'Andrews must have been traveling at speed, because the Kid was badly injured and the car windshield was caved in' with where he says the car was hit (it looks futher back to my eyes from the photograph, likely just in front of the right-side drivers front door pillar)

What a ****ing idiot. Even if Andrews car was at a full stop, a 100kg (rider plus bike) object hitting the side of a stationary car at 30 odd kph is going to do some serious damage to both themselves and the car.

The only way Andrews wife (who was driving) commits an offence is if she:

1. Drove off without rendering assistance (the cops would have been all over that, she was there when they got there but they failed to breathalyze her, so unless you can prove otherwise, this did not happen).
2. Cut across a bicycle lane without giving way causing the cyclist to impact the side of her car at right angles. (Possible given where the impact took place, but surely the cops would have been all over that as well)
3. She was drunk (possible, but the Cops did not breathalyze her so we'll never know).
4. She was otherwise driving recklessly or dangerously (and there is no evidence to suggest this).

What evidence do you have of her doing any of the above 4 things?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

zill said:
Here is a video with a statement from the cyclists father.
Click to expand...

Hearsay. The father was not a witness. He was not there. He's only going on (at best) what his son told him, and we already know (from the Police investigation) that the Andrews family was there, because the Cops failed to breathalyze them (and did not charge them with Failing to Render assistance, which they would have done if Andrews was stupid enough to call the cops, tell them what happened, and then do a runner anyway)

Find me some actual evidence please.
 
Malifice said:
I don't have to find an article saying Andrews and his Wife remained on the scene after the crash, you have to find one where it claims they did not remain on the scene.

You're the one making the claim (unsupported) that it was a Hit and Run. Ergo, it's your job to prove it.

What we do know is Andrews immediately called 000 after the crash, and the police who attended the site got in trouble for failing to breathalyze the people present.

So ****ing someone was there for them to forget to breathalyze, and sure as shit if Dan Andrews wife (who was driving) had done a runner, they would have charged her with 'Failing to stop and render assistance after a crash'.

There are literally zero articles (including from Sky News) making any claims that Andrews (or his wife) did a runner.

Answer honestly, where are you getting the 'hit and run' angle from?
Click to expand...
I provided a video from the victims father indicating that he didn't remain on the scene.

I called it a hit and run because it was:
A hit and run occurs when a person involved in a vehicle accident leaves the scene without stopping to fulfill their legal obligations

The police went to the home they were renting to fail to breathalyse them. The officers were also not punished in any way.
 
Malifice said:
There is no diagram in that article.

Just some cooker trying to claim that 'Andrews must have been traveling at speed, because the Kid was badly injured and the car windshield was caved in' with where he says the car was hit (it looks futher back to my eyes from the photograph, likely just in front of the right-side drivers front door pillar)

What a ****ing idiot. Even if Andrews car was at a full stop, a 100kg (rider plus bike) object hitting the side of a stationary car at 30 odd kph is going to do some serious damage to both themselves and the car.

The only way Andrews wife (who was driving) commits an offence is if she:

1. Drove off without rendering assistance (the cops would have been all over that, she was there when they got there but they failed to breathalyze her, so unless you can prove otherwise, this did not happen).
2. Cut across a bicycle lane without giving way causing the cyclist to impact the side of her car at right angles. (Possible given where the impact took place, but surely the cops would have been all over that as well)
3. She was drunk (possible, but the Cops did not breathalyze her so we'll never know).
4. She was otherwise driving recklessly or dangerously (and there is no evidence to suggest this).

What evidence do you have of her doing any of the above 4 things?
Click to expand...
You are such a clown. The victim didn't even have a statement taken from him by the police.

The article does have a diagram of where it occured, as well a photo of the area. As well as experts claiming it couldn't have happened as the Andrews said it did.

My claim is that the justice system here is as corrupt as the US system, you are arguing that because they weren't found at fault, all is good. I am claiming corruption. The police recording Andrews wife under her maiden name is also dodgy as **** and no reason it should have occured except as part of a cover up.
 
Balls In said:
The whining over Trumps picks is laughable. When will the democrats and their media understand they are irrelevant? Trump said exactly what he intended, that's what people wanted and that's what he's doing.
Click to expand...

you dont think the selection of Gaetz is laughable as attorney general when he has always been a sub par performer and now its been revealed he is a pedophile and sexual predator with his sex trafficking. Like have some standards. You truly cant think Pete Hegseth is going to achieve anything meaningful as secretary of defence do you. You think someone of his record will have any kind of respect from seasoned generals. If by some miracle he gets confirmed, which I dont think he will, he will be sacked pretty quickly. I cant see anyone listening to him. He doesnt have the understanding about how a beast like the pentagon works.
 
adelaidecrows said:
you dont think the selection of Gaetz is laughable as attorney general when he has always been a sub par performer and now its been revealed he is a pedophile and sexual predator with his sex trafficking. Like have some standards. You truly cant think Pete Hegseth is going to achieve anything meaningful as secretary of defence do you. You think someone of his record will have any kind of respect from seasoned generals. If by some miracle he gets confirmed, which I dont think he will, he will be sacked pretty quickly. I cant see anyone listening to him. He doesnt have the understanding about how a beast like the pentagon works.
Click to expand...

Ah the bloke who is the type of person who makes others want to vote for people like Trump is back.

Nobody outside of your echo chamber gives a toss what triggered people like you think.

It's why the people you supported got utterly wrecked by the working class.
 
adelaidecrows said:
you dont think the selection of Gaetz is laughable as attorney general when he has always been a sub par performer and now its been revealed he is a pedophile and sexual predator with his sex trafficking. Like have some standards. You truly cant think Pete Hegseth is going to achieve anything meaningful as secretary of defence do you. You think someone of his record will have any kind of respect from seasoned generals. If by some miracle he gets confirmed, which I dont think he will, he will be sacked pretty quickly. I cant see anyone listening to him. He doesnt have the understanding about how a beast like the pentagon works.
Click to expand...
Why do you have the most misogynistic character ever created for TV as your avatar but you have an issue with Trump's 'misogyny'?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top