List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency talk Pt 7

[Lore]

Hello Tiger fans!

The embedded resources below are kept up to date by the trade board mods (as much as possible – we are human after all). Enjoy!

Spoiler: 2023 Draft Order

Spoiler: 2024 Draft Order, aka Future Picks

Spoiler: Blue Tick Rumours

tugga you may like to sticky or merge this post, move it to the start of the thread (so the sticky post doesn't rotate if a post is deleted before it), or copy it to your draft thread.

 

[sante]

We getting anyone else?

Nick Daicos

 

[Noidnadroj]

I still think it was a worthwhile trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If he plays a prominent midfield role in a top-4 team some time in the next 6-years then absolutely yes.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[GoTigers2015]

 

[beema limapep]

Koschitzke to Richmond for pick 49

 

[Danog]

Are we even using 4 picks? Don't we only have 3 list slots free, or am I dumb?

 

[lizard man]

The opposition spare defender next year will be confused and unsure what to do with us next year, he will think do I look to guard lunch? Do I look to guard kosi? And before he knows it the confusion has given a window of opportunity and one of them is of the leash and taken a mark inside 50

 

[AstuteTiger]

Looks better in a tigers guernsey. Pick 49 well done Tiges!

 

[AstuteTiger]

Are we even using 4 picks? Don't we only have 3 list slots free, or am I dumb?

We have 4. Probably use 3 in ND and leave one for SSP (before season starts)

 

[tiger_tough]

Pick 49 for a bloke I reckon will start r1 and has plenty of upside.

Happy with that.

 

[beema limapep]

Koschitzke to Richmond

 

[AstuteTiger]

Just offer our F3 big deal

No need. the hawks wilted in the end and accepted 49

 

[Noidnadroj]

GC will ‘spend’ 6 x picks ahead of 41 for 3 x academy kids and 3 x picks ahead of our 29.

So would I be correct in saying 29 remains at 29 (3 picks out and 3 players in) and 41 becomes 38 (6 picks out and 3 players in)?

29, 38, 65 and 68 is a decent hand given we’ve got Hopper and Kosi, as well as the tasty extras in 2024 draft and only lost Soldo.

And with all the academy kids plus Croft father son (not sure if there’s any other pick matching?) our 65 and 68 become approx 55 and 58 - these might be very handy if there’s a ruck ‘slider’ and/or a KPF we can draft (Larkey and Mitch Lewis were both 60+ in draft)


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Morro]

I dont have high expectations of Kosi, but a goal a game and some ruck relief splattered with caving in of oppo defenders who try to fill the hole would be a great return.

 

[Drunken Wookie]

What a faaaarken steal for Blooze
So livid they got him so cheap

****ing sketchy I reckon, what sane list manager would think this was a good deal for the Suns? why give them 28 as well? Makes no sense unless Hollands has like 12 months to live.

 

[juss]

GC will ‘spend’ 6 x picks ahead of 41 for 3 x academy kids and 3 x picks ahead of our 29.

So would I be correct in saying 29 remains at 29 (3 picks out and 3 players in) and 41 becomes 38 (6 picks out and 3 players in)?

29, 38, 65 and 68 is a decent hand given we’ve got Hopper and Kosi, as well as the tasty extras in 2024 draft and only lost Soldo.

And with all the academy kids plus Croft father son (not sure if there’s any other pick matching?) our 65 and 68 become approx 55 and 58 - these might be very handy if there’s a ruck ‘slider’ and/or a KPF we can draft (Larkey and Mitch Lewis were both 60+ in draft)


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Top 40 picks are important list builders, those later picks will we even use them?

 

[Drunken Wookie]

View attachment 1834556

would bang

 

[Coach_Required]

Pick 49 for a bloke I reckon will start r1 and has plenty of upside.

Happy with that.

Goes to show how crap the trade period is.

Richmond to Hawks > we will give you pick 50
Hawks to Richmond > Nope we want pick 25
Richmond to Hawks > We have traded Soldo, so we can now give you pick 49
Hawks to Richmond > Nope we now want a F3 pick
Richmond to Hawks > here is pick 49 take it or leave it
Hawks to Richmond > Ok, done deal

What a waste of time, could have just given them pick 50 last week.

 

[Drunken Wookie]

Goes to show how crap the trade period is.

Richmond to Hawks > we will give you pick 50
Hawks to Richmond > Nope we want pick 25
Richmond to Hawks > We have traded Soldo, so we can now give you pick 49
Hawks to Richmond > Nope we now want a F3 pick
Richmond to Hawks > here is pick 49 take it or leave it
Hawks to Richmond > Ok, done deal

What a waste of time, could have just given them pick 50 last week.

Their list manager just wanted to look busy for a week.

 

[blaisee]

GC will ‘spend’ 6 x picks ahead of 41 for 3 x academy kids and 3 x picks ahead of our 29.

So would I be correct in saying 29 remains at 29 (3 picks out and 3 players in) and 41 becomes 38 (6 picks out and 3 players in)?

29, 38, 65 and 68 is a decent hand given we’ve got Hopper and Kosi, as well as the tasty extras in 2024 draft and only lost Soldo.

And with all the academy kids plus Croft father son (not sure if there’s any other pick matching?) our 65 and 68 become approx 55 and 58 - these might be very handy if there’s a ruck ‘slider’ and/or a KPF we can draft (Larkey and Mitch Lewis were both 60+ in draft)


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

importantly Pick 41 which will fall inside pick 40 is a pick we can target an acade3my kid from another club and they cannot match

 

[bc27]

Adding Kositchke and Lynch to the forward line will give this team a far better forward structure to kick too.

We looked lost going forward this year and that was mainly due to having no decent tall targets to work off.

It will allow Shai to get way more dangerous again.

-Shai scoring shots with Lynch and Riewoldt in the forward line in 2022 = 84
Shai in 2023 without Lynch and a one legged Riewoldt = 60.

It’s no coincidence that small dangerous forwards have massive seasons when there is a very good tall forward to work off.

 

[The Mighty]

Goes to show how crap the trade period is.

Richmond to Hawks > we will give you pick 50
Hawks to Richmond > Nope we want pick 25
Richmond to Hawks > We have traded Soldo, so we can now give you pick 49
Hawks to Richmond > Nope we now want a F3 pick
Richmond to Hawks > here is pick 49 take it or leave it
Hawks to Richmond > Ok, done deal

What a waste of time, could have just given them pick 50 last week.

Reckon Hawks had a line on Ginnivam earlier than the media knew and the clubs kept it quiet.

Hawks wanted that higher pick for him but Im just guessing.

Campaigners tried to play us.

 

[The Mighty]

Their list manager just wanted to look busy for a week.

As did ours

 

[prodigy]

I know I'm going early on this as no one has said it yet, but Kosi has been traded to Richmond.

 

[Drunken Wookie]

Reckon Hawks had a line on Ginnivam earlier than the media knew and the clubs kept it quiet.

Hawks wanted that higher pick for him but Im just guessing.

Campaigners tried to play us.

reckon ginivan had a line too.

 

[The Mighty]

Adding Kositchke and Lynch to the forward line will give this team a far better forward structure to kick too.

We looked lost going forward this year and that was mainly due to having no decent tall targets to work off.

It will allow Shai to get way more dangerous again.

-Shai scoring shots with Lynch and Riewoldt in the forward line in 2022 = 84
Shai in 2023 without Lynch and a one legged Riewoldt = 60.

It’s no coincidence that small dangerous forwards have massive seasons when there is a very good tall forward to work off.

Hope Kosi doesn't mind having a run in the ruck Kos hes probably gonna have to here and there now weve sold o Ivan Soldo!