Top 100 players since 1980

Remove this Banner Ad

I reckon he's a bit unlucky to miss out but it's hard to fit them all in.
As a comparison, Cyril Rioli won premierships, starred in 2015’s decider, and did freakish things weekly. He’s only just on the list. Garry Wilson was probably the best rover in the comp when the Krakouers debuted. I’ve only just re-included him.
 
Gray was on the list 12 months or so ago and would be literally a handful of spots back. Again, my somewhat subjective take on watching players for 45 years, is that Isaac Heeney is producing a level of quality that impresses me marginally more than the consistent season upon season career of Gray. However, somewhat objectively, I needed to see it shown to the degree he had over that last 2-3 years rather than in flashes. A season of rubbish in 2025 would tarnish that view without a doubt. I also want this list to be dynamically changing rather than just based on end of career status. Heeney and Merrett are in the conversation as best players in the comp at present and thoroughly deserve consideration at this point. But I also recognise that others would prefer Gray, Wayne Johnston, Rance, or even Tony Shaw. Again, you might be right in that I’ve jumped the gun on Heeney. But his level of performance has been eye-catching and I feel like he’s found his mojo as an elite footballer. Let’s see how it pans out over the next few years. I’ll be fully hands up in acknowledgement of my misreading of this if he falls off a cliff 😁

Fair enough. I think overall it's a pretty good list and whilst my positioning would be different, I'd have most of the same names you have. There's probably 6 or 7 "clear" changes I'd make but after that it becomes small margins and personal preferences.

I might share my thoughts on who'd I'd swap and why (if interested) rather than try and do a 100 of my own.
 
I think my first change would be:

Out: Jobe Watson
In: Scott West

With all due respect, this swap feels less "personal preference" and more of a no brainer. They were both quite similar players in many ways - neither were blessed with pace but both were inside beasts that could find the contested ball/win a clearance at will with good vision and neat (if unremarkable) disposal. They were both the leader of their midfield and the "engine room" for their respective sides. The clear difference is that West was elite for far, far longer - and I would also argue his peak was higher (without accounting for the controversy surrounding Jobe's peak). West won the best and fairest 7 times to Jobe's 3 and was All Australian 5 times to Jobe's 2. He was top 3 in the Brownlow 4 times to Jobe being top 10 once. Not only did West play over 100 more games, he was a B&F winner at age 20 and was still All Australian (and runner up in the Brownlow) at age 31. By comparison, Watson's peak was very short - he was lucky not to be delisted at 20, didn't crack 10 BL votes until 24 and was no longer elite at 29.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The next change I'd probably make is:

Out: Mark Mercuri
In: Eddie Betts

Rationale: Was Mercuri smooth moving? Yes! Did he have a fantastic season in '99? Absolutely. Top 100 since 1980? Not all that close for mine. In fact, outside of '99, I'm not sure he was amongst the game's elite (i.e. top 10-15 or so) any other year. Just in double checking, he was not All Australian any other year, did not crack 10 votes in the Brownlow any other year and as far as I can tell, was not top 3 in the B&F any other year. He would have big games (including in finals) and was influential beyond the stat sheet but for top 100, you need to be amongst the game's best week in, week out, year in, year out in my view.
There's a few option on who I could have brought in but I've decided to mention Eddie Betts first. For the time period in question (45 years of modern footy), he kicked (comfortably) more goals than any other small forward. On top of that, he recorded the most assists since the stat was kept. All up, he recorded 958 goals + assists - that's ridiculous for anyone in 21st century footy, let alone a small, crumbing forward (next best being about 200 behind). Add to that an elite peak (75 goals in a season, 3 straight AA's and 6 times in 7 years in the squad), unusual longevity (350 games) and a ridiculous highlights package and I reckon he's in. He's arguably the best in his position for the time period (not even close to true for Mercuri) which is why I'd bring in Betts.
 
I think my first change would be:

Out: Jobe Watson
In: Scott West

With all due respect, this swap feels less "personal preference" and more of a no brainer. They were both quite similar players in many ways - neither were blessed with pace but both were inside beasts that could find the contested ball/win a clearance at will with good vision and neat (if unremarkable) disposal. They were both the leader of their midfield and the "engine room" for their respective sides. The clear difference is that West was elite for far, far longer - and I would also argue his peak was higher (without accounting for the controversy surrounding Jobe's peak). West won the best and fairest 7 times to Jobe's 3 and was All Australian 5 times to Jobe's 2. He was top 3 in the Brownlow 4 times to Jobe being top 10 once. Not only did West play over 100 more games, he was a B&F winner at age 20 and was still All Australian (and runner up in the Brownlow) at age 31. By comparison, Watson's peak was very short - he was lucky not to be delisted at 20, didn't crack 10 BL votes until 24 and was no longer elite at 29.
There is definitely an argument for choosing West. As similar players he definitely has the greater span of elite years. No question. I’d argue though, that Jobe’s peak performing years were superior to West’s. The number of team lifting games he inspired were eye-catching. West went about his business in a super-consistent way of which I admire massively but he was a beige player and at their peak I’d choose Jobe. Again, this is my subjective take, and I have absolutely no issue in others objectively preferring West. Also, Jobe’s BnF total would definitely have been 2, or even 3, more if not for injury. 2011, 2013 and 2014 he missed games despite consistently being his side’s best player when fit. I think it was probably the ability to will himself upon a contest at crucial times in a game that sways me as much as anything.
 
The next change I'd probably make is:

Out: Mark Mercuri
In: Eddie Betts

Rationale: Was Mercuri smooth moving? Yes! Did he have a fantastic season in '99? Absolutely. Top 100 since 1980? Not all that close for mine. In fact, outside of '99, I'm not sure he was amongst the game's elite (i.e. top 10-15 or so) any other year. Just in double checking, he was not All Australian any other year, did not crack 10 votes in the Brownlow any other year and as far as I can tell, was not top 3 in the B&F any other year. He would have big games (including in finals) and was influential beyond the stat sheet but for top 100, you need to be amongst the game's best week in, week out, year in, year out in my view.
There's a few option on who I could have brought in but I've decided to mention Eddie Betts first. For the time period in question (45 years of modern footy), he kicked (comfortably) more goals than any other small forward. On top of that, he recorded the most assists since the stat was kept. All up, he recorded 958 goals + assists - that's ridiculous for anyone in 21st century footy, let alone a small, crumbing forward (next best being about 200 behind). Add to that an elite peak (75 goals in a season, 3 straight AA's and 6 times in 7 years in the squad), unusual longevity (350 games) and a ridiculous highlights package and I reckon he's in. He's arguably the best in his position for the time period (not even close to true for Mercuri) which is why I'd bring in Betts.
Betts was on the list for several years and is another who is in the cusp of entry. I’m probably doing a disservice to him by leaving him out but I’m not so sure it would be at the expense of Mercs. Sure, Mercs’ aesthetically pleasing style counts for a lot here but, as you highlight, it’s backed up by some outstanding finals contributions and one of the best single midfield maestro years we’ve seen. It’s a shame things fell away for him after 2000 but that doesn’t detract from the level he did reach and the impact he had in a successful era. In terms of aesthetically gifted players, is he any less deserving than the universally acclaimed Robbie Flower who only won one BnF and didn’t have many notable big game heroics or other major awards/accolades? I like to romanticise the wizardry of gifted players but they need some substance to their careers too. Mercs definitely had that, and I’d argue that Flower’s longevity as a talismanic presence in a woeful club culture is also substantial. There’s no way in hell I’d leave Flower off this list, at this stage, and Mercs is not out of his league in this respect.

If I were to chose between Betts and West I would select Betts and might be worth a reconsideration. Is Dipper under the pump perhaps?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Top 100 players since 1980

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top