Human Movement The early Homo Sapiens

Remove this Banner Ad

Just watched the YT clip on this

The thought that came to me was is it related to the Stone of Scone
Good thought, it could be, easy to check out if they are they are the same type of stone. Mind you it's a wee little pebble compared to the altar stone. Our ancestors certainly had a penchant for special rocks.
My friend Peter, the paleoartist suggested the Pleistocene glaciation could have moved it. Stones moved like this have a great name, glacial erratics. Being an ignoramus about geology I had too check if stones this big can be moved by glaciation - they can. The various waves of Pleistocene glaciation did cover Scotland and Britain, so it's a plausible theory.
 
Good thought, it could be, easy to check out if they are they are the same type of stone. Mind you it's a wee little pebble compared to the altar stone. Our ancestors certainly had a penchant for special rocks.
My friend Peter, the paleoartist suggested the Pleistocene glaciation could have moved it. Stones moved like this have a great name, glacial erratics. Being an ignoramus about geology I had too check if stones this big can be moved by glaciation - they can. The various waves of Pleistocene glaciation did cover Scotland and Britain, so it's a plausible theory.
They mentioned this in the clip - apparently there are no visible glacier trails

As to the truth of that I cant say

Actually scratch that Scone theory - Stone of Scone is red sandstone and the Altar Stone is bluestone
 

Log in to remove this ad.

1732659233257.png
The Conversation has a good article about the Denisovans. Gives an update on what is known, including some discussion about interbreeding with sapiens and Denisovan derived genes.


Added - this is an interesting one from a few years ago about the discovery of a 'mixed race' Neanderthal/Denisovan lass.
So I ask folks, do different species in the wild cross bred and produce fertile offspring? No they don't, because if they did they would be regarded as one species. So Neanderthals, Denisovans and us should be regarded as one species. Time to end sapiens bias.
 
Last edited:
From the muddy shoreline of Lake Turkana in Kenya, scientists found tracks of two hominids, Homo erectus and Paranthropus boisei, the first our likely ancestor and the other a more distant relative. It's the first evidence these hominids coexisted. The human tree was once bushy but has been pared back to just us. This article, by one of the authors appeared in the Conversation.

Original paper https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado5275
 
Scientists have been able to pin down the last period of Neanderthal gene flow to modern humans, starting about 50,500 years ago and lasting about 7,000 years, after which the Neanderthals began to disappear. Make what you want out of that. The only evidence is the 1% and 2% Neanderthal genes present in Eurasian people today.

 
This article suggests a reason why the homo family formed species far quicker than other large vertebrates. I need to think about this one a bit but it may prove the old quote I keep repeating, 'technology changes the rules'.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Human Movement The early Homo Sapiens

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top