Scorpus
Moderator
- Apr 16, 2014
- 61,838
- 165,482
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Moderator
- #51
I agree that we should be cycling through the low end of the list but I think this is harder than it sounds. You don't just want to discard a respectable role player who is never going to win a BnF but does a solid job week to week while adding leadership and experience to try an unknown player just because you haven't seen them in the AFL and they might be an upgrade. This sort of thing is appealing to fans because of the excitement of an unknown new player, but the club has seen plenty of everyone on the list and I'm fine with them being selective with first team promotions.
I think there is a bit of a problem with selecting who lands on that 'solid role player' tier. Ben Keays is a good example in my mind, Ned McHenry not so much.
In a rebuilding phase selections should be based entirely around making a premiership team
This largely means identifying and predicting who the best players will be in the future, not selecting who is slightly better now
At times this might mean selecting a few experienced players instead of potentially better juniors, but the only reason to do that should be because playing too many juniors hurts their development. You do need some leaders and bigger bodies at times. And it's important these players are true leaders, not fake leaders that only have experience
So yes, clubs in a rebuilding phase should be discarding the experienced role player for the junior if the role player has little chance of being part of a premiership team. Because premierships are the only thing that matters
Some clubs like the Crows instead focus on stupid metrics like winning in a given week or make the eight and anything can happen, rather than the longer term goal of winning a flag. So we decide that a mediocre experienced role player is a lock too early, and by the time we finally figure out they actually aren't going to be part of a premiership team they've played too many games and we have to trial someone else, starting again from a weaker position than we would have been had we prioritised greater potential to begin with