-
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
So How Dangerous is COVID Really?
- Thread starter Lavender Bushranger
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Dec 20, 2021
- 6,558
- 17,871
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
You cancellled and banned people based on your perception of their vaccination status
Now you are being precious about your own privacy.
You are an utter fraud and the way you have dismissed me and tried to attack my character just proves
The utter legand that is Bruce Doull must shudder he has a weak beta as yourself using his image to masquerade as a tough guy
- Dec 20, 2021
- 6,558
- 17,871
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
We were told that we need a jab every 6 Months.
Something Chief was very much on board with
It's now June and Chief doesn't know when his last shot was or when he'll take his next but it was last year.
I think we can assume at what we've been told that Chief is currently unvaccinated and hopefully is being kept away from the vunerable.
Something Chief was very much on board with
It's now June and Chief doesn't know when his last shot was or when he'll take his next but it was last year.
I think we can assume at what we've been told that Chief is currently unvaccinated and hopefully is being kept away from the vunerable.
Last edited:
Chief
~ Shmalpha ~
- Admin
- #1,429
So here it is, the usual nebulous Covid-denier cooker stuff which everybody reading this expected when Stoke started popping off:
Who is "we"? Who told you?
If it was needed to cover new strains, then that's what would have happened. My first two were pretty close in time like most normal people at the time.
So what you're saying is the doomsday cooker whinging about "big pharma will make us get a bazillion jabs a day" has turned out to be wrong. So you're switching to this disingenuous tripe.
You have a different definition of "vaccinated" than anyone else.
"Can't recall - last year maybe. My next shot is next week." - This you rejected as an answer to your gotcha question.
"Sir Hiram Maxim told us humans would die if we travelled at over 40 miles per hour! And he was a professor of physiology! Yet YOU TRAVEL IN A CAR AT 100k's AN HOUR! Fraud!"
Who is "we"? Who told you?
If it was needed to cover new strains, then that's what would have happened. My first two were pretty close in time like most normal people at the time.
So what you're saying is the doomsday cooker whinging about "big pharma will make us get a bazillion jabs a day" has turned out to be wrong. So you're switching to this disingenuous tripe.
You have a different definition of "vaccinated" than anyone else.
"Can't recall - last year maybe. My next shot is next week." - This you rejected as an answer to your gotcha question.
"Sir Hiram Maxim told us humans would die if we travelled at over 40 miles per hour! And he was a professor of physiology! Yet YOU TRAVEL IN A CAR AT 100k's AN HOUR! Fraud!"
You know Chief was only complying with what he was told, so not to get demonitised.
Dogs_R_Us
Space Traveller
Demonised? Or de-monetised? Both bad news
Big tech held a lot of people to ransom. Many didn't comply and the ad revenue stopped.Demonised? Or de-monetised? Both bad news
This behaviour should be illegal
- May 5, 2014
- 1,216
- 1,618
- AFL Club
- Gold Coast
Unfortunately greed (and the acquisition of money) is pretty much the prevailing emotion in humans.
Most are unable to take the financial hit and err on the side of caution (be open to the vaccine potentially being dangerous and allow discourse on their platform), and will use mental gymnastics ("government says it's safe, when have they lied?") to justify following the orders and not losing revenue/ turning down money.
What Youtube has done is an absolute disgrace. Pretty much any comment or video with any type of concern regarding the vaccine was censored and auto-deleted, same with anything else that is posted that doesn't align with the political position of their owner's.
Sadly I don't see it changing.
You've got Youtube and Google which absurdly censors things to the "left", Twitter which essentially censors stuff to the "right".
It seems like it is getting to the point where it is impossible to have balanced 'town-hall' discourse on a platform where there's healthy debate and constructive outcomes for people looking for information from either side.
I don't know. Google and co rule the world so who knows. I understand though. You build up a website, youtube channel etc over many years so you ain't going to blow it by allowing what Google say is misinfo/disinfo on your site. There is also the GDI (Global Disinformation Index) to comply with, otherwise the money train slows down. It's a touchy subject. It's an interesting rabbit hole to go down.
Not going to argue with you obviously, but of course you have to comply with their rules or the money eventually stops. It's not even controversial. I will leave the subject right here.
Chief
~ Shmalpha ~
- Admin
- #1,441
Of course there is some control exerted, per the great de-boobening of the last decade.
News - Bikini, Lingerie, Cleavage Pictures and Avatars - The Puritanical Purge
UPDATED August 1, 2013 BigFooty.com runs advertising from a number of networks, including Google AdSense. These networks are very conservative in the content they want ads to appear against. AdSense have policies against running ads against content considered "sexually gratifying" among other...
bit.ly
But Covid misinformation is not amongst that.
