In my humble view, as at the middle of December:
1. get an ex-AFL player a job (with an existing club sponsor) for $50K, and you keep him for the following season, if not longer;
2. offer a player $500 per game, and you'll have him for a few weeks until another club trumps the offer.
If Spriggs is committed to playing for OB in 2009, I daresay it'll be due to an employment situation (as per Matty Robbins, David Loats, Steve McKee, etc.) rather than cash being thrown around. That's entirely permitted within the VAFA rules.
Just my opinion though.
Very good post - it is ambitious to consider that the VAFA is a pure Ammo competition with the quality of players running around, considering that there is so much cash floating around in the 5 other Metro competitions, with some clubs having excellent facilities.
What is stopping a club offering a player a $50,000 for a part time cleaners job?? This is why the Ammo's tag is a joke, there is nothing wrong with playing payers or incentives but seriously..
Also people are naive if they don't think that there is some cash going to players secretly in brown paper bags from rich club associates.
The problem is it is very hard to prove that payments are going on, which is why the smart clubs get away with it and use the loopholes.