Passing that off as giving him an objective opinion was a particular highlight. 3 journo's going "I reckon player X gets this many points for this category". That should have been turned into a peer reviewed research paper.Ha ha ha. I’ll be honest, I haven’t followed this thread closely but what jumped out at me was someone bestowing a high degree of credence to “a discussion between objective industry professionals”.
Reminds me of the good old days when Falcon thought he’d won any argument by saying “there’s an ARTICLE!!”