Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would his value plummet lmfaoWould make sense for the cats to shop him this year - before his value plummets.
I think the value of having him next year would exceed anything that we'd get in tradeWould make sense for the cats to shop him this year - before his value plummets.
You and I may know better. But you'd be surprised how many people rate him. Cash in while you can.Why would his value plummet lmfao
He's still very young and has shown he can perform exceptionally well. Geelong should only trade him if they can get a high end pick or player. Otherwise, much better off seeing if he can rediscover 2022/23 form.Would make sense for the cats to shop him this year - before his value plummets.
Would make sense for the cats to shop him this year - before his value plummets.
Interesting take.
Agree Twomey is the most reliable pundit, helped by the fact he shares an office with the key decision makers.
Ralph I rate higher than Edmund by virtue of the fact he breaks more stories. Sure when he indulges in speculative waffling he can posit some dumb theories. But his actual news articles are reasonable as far as AFL junket media standards go.
By contrast I reckon Edmund breaks a third of the yarns Ralph does. More of his journalism I find to be of the “I’ve confirmed what someone else has already said” variety.
But all of the above are more authoritative than Jay Clark or Damien Barrett.
but I've been reliably informed that players lose value in the final year of their contract
so clubs dont lose leverage once a player runs out of contract? you seem conflicted on thisDepends how they play prior to that SweatyAss, would require a bit of nuance and an actual thought process rather than writing smarmy little comments
Pretty sure his value would go down, pretty sure we'd hold him to his contract anyway. Same as we did with Sav. Same as you did with Smith last year.so clubs dont lose leverage once a player runs out of contract? you seem conflicted on this
so clubs dont lose leverage once a player runs out of contract? you seem conflicted on this
Pretty sure his value would go down, pretty sure we'd hold him to his contract anyway. Same as we did with Sav. Same as you did with Smith last year.
Dogs have a 6 year contract on the table for SDK.Think Collingwood and Carlton would both forget about Houston and redirect their attention to Sam. Don’t see any reason why the Cats should trade him though, including to make room for Oliver.
I think the club would be extremely exposed for rucks next year if they let him go. Getting the last year of his contract out of him would give the club more benefit than anything we'd get back in trading him early.I don't really see why Geelong would be open to trading him and I suspect that the comment that he is gettable is from his perspective as he is probably disappointed about not being involved in finals.
I would be surprised if he was gettable from the club's perspective, as he's a 23 year old 204cm KPD with proven high level talent and Grand Final experience. He's not even in his peak years, so why would Geelong even entertain this trade?
Similar to a Warner trade, my guess is that Geelong hold him to his contract and that this trade doesn't happen, unless somebody pays significant overs for him.
They might have to give him up to get the Oliver and smith trades across the lineI don't really see why Geelong would be open to trading him and I suspect that the comment that he is gettable is from his perspective as he is probably disappointed about not being involved in finals.
I would be surprised if he was gettable from the club's perspective, as he's a 23 year old 204cm KPD with proven high level talent and Grand Final experience. He's not even in his peak years, so why would Geelong even entertain this trade?
Similar to a Warner trade, my guess is that Geelong hold him to his contract and that this trade doesn't happen, unless somebody pays significant overs for him.
Do GFC really see him as a ruck?I think the club would be extremely exposed for rucks next year if they let him go. Getting the last year of his contract out of him would give the club more benefit than anything we'd get back in trading him early.
His best work this year was in the ruck and he was arguably or best ruck this year.Do GFC really see him as a ruck?
Interesting, SDK looked a gun down back previously. O’Sullivan likely close to ready next year so maybe ruck is the way to go for SDK.His best work this year was in the ruck and he was arguably or best ruck this year.
I think they will have him ruck 40% game time with Conway dropping back as a loose tall in defence. I don't think there's any other ruck scenario next year that will work for us.
Will look good playing for his old mans team
Some think COS it's ready next year but I think another year at least. He started well but trailed right off in the 2s. We'd need to squeeze another year from blitz in the backline and hope Conway can take up full time ruck work from 2026.Interesting, SDK looked a gun down back previously. O’Sullivan likely close to ready next year so maybe ruck is the way to go for SDK.