Remove this Banner Ad

Trades Round 5 Trades

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Delayed bringing him in with May and Lever out but Bowey seems the goods this year. Awkward price if he doesn't become a keeper though
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #52
Delayed bringing him in with May and Lever out but Bowey seems the goods this year. Awkward price if he doesn't become a keeper though
One of Lever or May has missed each week. Lever out tonight.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

with how shite the rookies have been, you're all sideways trading rookies, not upgrading.

banking 100k from fos/lalor/lash to a rookie is a sideways trade.
3 shite rookies who made 50k down and 1 up is still an upgrade

It's round 5, we aren't culling the good rookies yet, of course the trades will feel worse
 
with how shite the rookies have been, you're all sideways trading rookies, not upgrading.

banking 100k from fos/lalor/lash to a rookie is a sideways trade.

That's why missing osullivan hurts and it's why I'm holding Lindsay who will play all year.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

That's why missing osullivan hurts and it's why I'm holding Lindsay who will play all year.
they were my thoughts when trading in lashcroft. I'm only looking to trade out rookies i started with (knevitt, hewett), or any dud ones i bring in for a bit of cash (hendo).

hoping that bice this week is another ✅
 
After focusing on rookies last week, I probably need to get Smith next.

I still think Petracca will come good eventually, but it's mighty tempting to downgrade him to Smith and upgrade Short to Whitfield If possible (have $100k itb already).
 
Delayed bringing him in with May and Lever out but Bowey seems the goods this year. Awkward price if he doesn't become a keeper though
Could have been a great POD if brought in last week, but it's unlikely he's a keeper and unlikely that he makes $150k after 2 price increases already IMO.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I need an R2. Flynn not even in the squad this week. Doh.

I love Liam Baker, but if he's gonna be played as a mid then he's gonna poo out consistent 85s and I want more.

I covet Connor O'Sullivan.

If the planets align, I may JUST be able to afford to switch Bakes into flex and then trade him to COS, and then trade Flynn to Briggs.

Need Briggs to look amazing while scoring about 90, and Bakes to score as much as possible while still looking expendable lol
 
with how shite the rookies have been, you're all sideways trading rookies, not upgrading.

banking 100k from fos/lalor/lash to a rookie is a sideways trade.

I tried to say that last week.

Imo it's ok to bank the 100k (in your example, especially if you've got reason to use it NOW), but people scrambling to genuinely sideways trade (Ie. Campo/Hastie to Moreus) on the hope of future cash is a bit nuts to me.

How many people actually paid money to get LAshcroft on the bubble only to possibly (*) make $100k (minus initial cost) for 2 trades?
(*) He might knock out a 120 this week and end up being 400ish, but the premise doesn't change.

The game is moving away from "investing" imho.
 
I tried to say that last week.

Imo it's ok to bank the 100k (in your example, especially if you've got reason to use it NOW), but people scrambling to genuinely sideways trade (Ie. Campo/Hastie to Moreus) on the hope of future cash is a bit nuts to me.

How many people actually paid money to get LAshcroft on the bubble only to possibly (*) make $100k (minus initial cost) for 2 trades?
(*) He might knock out a 120 this week and end up being 400ish, but the premise doesn't change.

The game is moving away from "investing" imho.
How is Campo to Moraes a bad trade?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top