
Not many people mentioning CJ's game - this guy is a machine for getting to the right places and now has his timing and confidence back for the aerial contests. Still loopy kicks but the good far outweighs that. He's been great in his two games back
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not many people mentioning CJ's game - this guy is a machine for getting to the right places and now has his timing and confidence back for the aerial contests. Still loopy kicks but the good far outweighs that. He's been great in his two games back
I didn't expect him to play so well on his return - fitted in very nicely.Not many people mentioning CJ's game - this guy is a machine for getting to the right places and now has his timing and confidence back for the aerial contests. Still loopy kicks but the good far outweighs that. He's been great in his two games back
My take from that is Gunner is the consummate professional. Chol, Mitch, Calsher & other up & coming forwards can learn a lot from him. He's forcing them to be betterI wouldn’t call it a stinker, it wasn’t his best game but he was busting his gut all match.
I just think the plan was probably to sub for Gunston but because he was playing so well, particularly in that 3rd quarter, it made sense to go with Chol instead.
No such thing as a 5 goal breeze.Not kicking a goal with a 5 goal breeze is not great.
Was 'one touch' as well, which is no mean feat with the Giants' pressure and the crazy conditions.Not many people mentioning CJ's game - this guy is a machine for getting to the right places and now has his timing and confidence back for the aerial contests. Still loopy kicks but the good far outweighs that. He's been great in his two games back
Not many people mentioning CJ's game - this guy is a machine for getting to the right places and now has his timing and confidence back for the aerial contests. Still loopy kicks but the good far outweighs that. He's been great in his two games back
I don't think he had a stinker in terms of effort, but Taylor absolutely killed him in the third, beat him one on one about 5 or six times in a row.Were you watching the game? He was chasing like crazy.
Sure, it was his best game for the club, but he certainly didn't have a stinker.
And the media never really went after Selwood. Other teams and fans would mention it but the media was always sympathetic to SelwoodThanks for taking the time to explain.
You're right - people who are paid to talk should have the vocab for this.
Watson is tiny and strong and fast. It makes him very hard to tackle. That's the tackler's problem, not Watson's.
They compare it to Selwood, who use to fold himself in half when a tackler approached him. Completely different. He was normal height and would turn a legitimate tackle into a high tackle. Watson goes hard and low and they don't know how to tackle him without grabbing him around the head.
Best piece of analysis I've heard about us.Toward the end of the call tonight Buckley said it wasn't any single feature of structure, speed, system or determination that made us so hard to play against, but all four of them.
It amazes me how "footy smart" and adaptable this team is. Each week they've crafted a different way of winning to overcome the conditions and the strength of the opposition on the day.
Since round 8 2024Sshhh.
We don’t want him on the Hawks. He has no f****n clue and it’s better he doesn’t.
He was so up and about how the GWS forwards were now at full tilt and expecting them to damage our defence.
Bzzzt. Wrong again David. Calling it now. We have the best defensive group of about 10 players that are capable of handling any type of forward set up.
The smarts of Harry Morrison are mentioned in this forum a lot but his goal summed it up, he would’ve been covered on his right so he snapped with his left. Another Samism passed down to his players.Geeze, I love this feeling!!!
I think what has been particularly pleasing over the last few wins are performances of some of the players who aren’t necessarily our ‘stars’ (i.e. those perceived to be stars externally).
Ward was one of our best players against Carlton, and still played a pretty good game against GWS.
Mackenzie had one of, if not, the best games of his career, racking up 30 touches and looked incredibly composed as always.
CJ has fitted back in seamlessly after some minor adjustments early in the Carlton game, and he is doing exactly what we need him to be doing.
MaGinness floated between the forward line and a tagger role, yet picked up 25 touches - I can’t think of many games he’s picked up 25 before, let alone playing as a tagger.
Morrison has done everything you could ask of him this year - he’s put his head over the ball when needed and creates an important link on the wing.
Gunston had 5 scoring shots, 16 touches, and did a massive role in quelling Taylor today (I don’t think we win without his influence), whilst he bobbed up with 2 very important goals against the Blues.
It all begs the question… if these guys are playing like this, how do we fit in the likes of CMac, Scrimshaw, Worpel, Dear, Lewis (who would be in many, if not most peoples, ‘best 23’)?!?
A great problem to have, that’s for sure.