Rita Panahi

Remove this Banner Ad

I like how the word 'progressive' is substituted for socialist/communist these days. Very quaint.

You teeth-gnashers who cry "socialist" or "communist" at every opportunity have precisely zero idea what those terms actually mean.
 
You should seriously consider changing your therapist and/or your medication 😇.

What part of my comment was an issue for you?

Do you know what a socialist is? Or a communist?

Explain how Bernie Sanders or Dan Andrews even come close to the true definition of either term.
 
I like how the word 'progressive' is substituted for socialist/communist these days. Very quaint.
I dislike how you think socialism and communism are the same thing.

Besides being progressive is not about being socialist specifically.

It's not even about being progressive on every topic.

It's not a bucket that means one thing. I'm talking about where he sits compared to the power brokers in his party.

To some Bernie would be too conservative.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What part of my comment was an issue for you?

Do you know what a socialist is? Or a communist?

Explain how Bernie Sanders or Dan Andrews even come close to the true definition of either term.
I have never made any reference to Bernie Sanders or Teflon Dan Andrews.
 
Left: you can't have a say unless you've been there
Person who has been there: a lot of people can't be trusted, I know because I was there and have seen it first hand
Left:racist bigot!

Dunno if I would agree that is the domain of the left, per se.

It certainly is the domain of the narrow-minded though.

The sooner we evolve from the whole left vs right diatribe (and I am guilty of it) the more likely we will be to see some real solutions to many of the world's problems.
 
Left: you can't have a say unless you've been there
Person who has been there: a lot of people can't be trusted, I know because I was there and have seen it first hand
Left:racist bigot!
Gross generalization on one very narrow topic, which at a guess I'm going to say is immigration and probably from a specific region given who this thread is about

I've got mates who are mostly left leaning, want to see more socialist services provided by the government but wants less immigration

You can't put everyone in a bucket and say they all agree on every topic because they agree on one topic
 
Go back and have another look you simpleton, specifically post #129 which is where you decided to get invloved in a conversation that had zero to do with you.
News flash, The Crackkeeper decrees I should not have got involved [as distinct from invloved whatever that is] in this conversation. I wasn’t aware he had the right to chose who can post.

For goodness sake in the future quote the actual quote you are responding to so you can have some credibility. Did your parents suffer from chronic RSI because of the number of times they picked up the toys you threw out of your cot?

Having the last say is obviously important for you so I’ll end with this post. Have a nice day😁.
 
houdinihuddo I’ve deleted a bunch of posts in here.

please stop with the puerile name calling.

if you can’t post a name without referencing a sexual organ or a drug of dependency, log off.
 
Last edited:
I like how the word 'progressive' is substituted for socialist/communist these days. Very quaint.
I like how the idea of politics that look to improve the lives of the have nots, and that push for better living standards for all are demonized by conservatives....at the very same time that these ‘Christians’ champion “all lives matter” and “pro life” mantras.

...but but but that evil man wants to make health care a right, end schoolyard gun massacres and raise the minimum wage... what arseh*le’s “socialists” are. 🤣
 
houdinihuddo I’ve deleted a bunch of posts in here.

please stop with the puerile name calling.

if you can’t post a name without referencing a sexual organ or a drug of dependency, log off.
More than happy with your decision however surely the same standards should apply to all posters particularly given the filthy derogatory posting in this thread! Trusting I haven’t been hacked I cannot recall making any reference to a sexual organ or a drug of dependency so if you cannot be specific your third sentence should be deleted.
Thank you.
 
News flash, The Crackkeeper decrees I should not have got involved [as distinct from invloved whatever that is] in this conversation. I wasn’t aware he had the right to chose who can post.

For goodness sake in the future quote the actual quote you are responding to so you can have some credibility. Did your parents suffer from chronic RSI because of the number of times they picked up the toys you threw out of your cot?

Having the last say is obviously important for you so I’ll end with this post. Have a nice day😁.

My error, post #126 is what I was referencing.

I'll put you on ignore now. Life is too short.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Please explain why Candace Owens is a stupid campaigner. Oh wait, no need, I know why, it's because a) you don't agree with her opinions and b) because she is so good at articulating everything that's bad about the left. Of course if a Conservative called two women Stupid Campaigners (one of whom is black) they would immediately be called out as being misogynists and racists. That's how the left works, right? You can say it, but I can't.
I think Candice Owens is a stupid campaigner for her attempt to legitamize hitler in Germany saying if he had just stayed in Germany that would be fine. Ignoring seizure of property and assets by people not considered ethnic Germans.

Her trying to bring up a man's criminal past as a counter point on why someone decided to put the knee on a mans throat for 8 minutes while he screamed for his mother while he slowly choked to death

Thats why shes a campaigner. Shes articulate sure. Still doesnt mean shes not a campaigner. Also in no where in talking did I bring up race or Gender nowhere in my post did i mention male/female/colour.
Shes a campaigner because of her viewpoints and several instances where shes said provocative things to inflame situations rather then be a rational human argue her point without being a campaigner, its not isolated incidents.
 
Dunno if I would agree that is the domain of the left, per se.

It certainly is the domain of the narrow-minded though.

The sooner we evolve from the whole left vs right diatribe (and I am guilty of it) the more likely we will be to see some real solutions to many of the world's problems.
Agree, however, nothing will change when anyone with a differing opinion is considered a far-right/Nazi etc...
20 years ago it was not seen in the same manner, but somewhere along the line any mildly conservative voice was silenced.

Ironically, the left (and I say the left ironically) are following how the nazis took over Germany, but they don't even realise they're doing it
 
Agree, however, nothing will change when anyone with a differing opinion is considered a far-right/Nazi etc...
20 years ago it was not seen in the same manner, but somewhere along the line any mildly conservative voice was silenced.

Ironically, the left (and I say the left ironically) are following how the nazis took over Germany, but they don't even realise they're doing it
Post number #142, there it is
 
Agree, however, nothing will change when anyone with a differing opinion is considered a far-right/Nazi etc...
20 years ago it was not seen in the same manner, but somewhere along the line any mildly conservative voice was silenced.

Ironically, the left (and I say the left ironically) are following how the nazis took over Germany, but they don't even realise they're doing it

The left is it?

Trump called the National Guard on his own people. Trump tear gassed citizens protesting legally, for a photo opportunity. Trump told those who disagreed with their Democrat governors to “liberate.” The right coined the term “fake news” and use it every time they disagree with a story, regardless of the evidence provided.

Trump and the right wing are bringing fascism to the United States and the lunatic fringe globally are following this lead.

But you want to point the finger at the left? I call bullshit.
 
Last edited:
The left is it?

Trump called the National Guard on his own people. Trump tear gassed citizens protesting legally, for a photo opportunity. Trump told those who disagreed with their Democrat governors to “liberate.” The right coined the term “fake news” and use it every time they disagree with a story, regardless of the evidence provided.

Trump and the right wing are bringing fascism to the United States and the lunatic fringe globally are following this lead.

But you want to point the finger at the left? I call bullshit.
Trump is an idiot.

As for my comment, look at the summarised version of the rise of the nazis

Identified a target: Jewish people
Saturate the media with identities that support your cause
Silence any voice that disagrees with you
Attack the target physically

Now compare to the current movements.
Targets: white people/men
Media saturated with people who support the cause and won't talk down amd/or analyse the entire situation
Shouting over the top and cutting off anyone/everyone (even in this threat all we hear is the racist cries instead of actual discussion.
Physical attacks have started, although sporadic, but becoming more common.

I don't deny there are issues on both sides of politics though, and trge that the majority can't see their own nose to spite their face
 
Trump is an idiot.

As for my comment, look at the summarised version of the rise of the nazis

Identified a target: Jewish people
Saturate the media with identities that support your cause
Silence any voice that disagrees with you
Attack the target physically

Now compare to the current movements.
Targets: white people/men
Media saturated with people who support the cause and won't talk down amd/or analyse the entire situation
Shouting over the top and cutting off anyone/everyone (even in this threat all we hear is the racist cries instead of actual discussion.
Physical attacks have started, although sporadic, but becoming more common.

I don't deny there are issues on both sides of politics though, and trge that the majority can't see their own nose to spite their face

How would you suggest the “left” go about it then?

Because all of the things you list above, whilst not the sole domain of the right are certainly dominated by it.

White men a target? You have conveniently overlooked thousands of years of black history. And female history for that matter.
 
Trump is an idiot.

As for my comment, look at the summarised version of the rise of the nazis

Identified a target: Jewish people
Saturate the media with identities that support your cause
Silence any voice that disagrees with you
Attack the target physically

Now compare to the current movements.
Targets: white people/men
Media saturated with people who support the cause and won't talk down amd/or analyse the entire situation
Shouting over the top and cutting off anyone/everyone (even in this threat all we hear is the racist cries instead of actual discussion.
Physical attacks have started, although sporadic, but becoming more common.

I don't deny there are issues on both sides of politics though, and trge that the majority can't see their own nose to spite their face
Wow
 
You teeth-gnashers who cry "socialist" or "communist" at every opportunity have precisely zero idea what those terms actually mean.
Nice assumption there. I know exactly what both terms mean. I know the differences between the two. Bernie is a self confessed socialist.
I dislike how you think socialism and communism are the same thing.

Besides being progressive is not about being socialist specifically.

It's not even about being progressive on every topic.

It's not a bucket that means one thing. I'm talking about where he sits compared to the power brokers in his party.

To some Bernie would be too conservative.
Where did I say they are the same thing? Seems you and Crypty like to take what I am saying and draw a nice long bow that suits your argument. I never said they are same thing. I said that the term progressive is used in place of socialist and communist. The left does it all the time. You said Bernie Sanders is a progressive, I was responding directly to that. Call him what he is, a Socialist. It would only be legit communists that would see Bernie as too Conservative.
 
Nice assumption there. I know exactly what both terms mean. I know the differences between the two. Bernie is a self confessed socialist.

Where did I say they are the same thing? Seems you and Crypty like to take what I am saying and draw a nice long bow that suits your argument. I never said they are same thing. I said that the term progressive is used in place of socialist and communist. The left does it all the time. You said Bernie Sanders is a progressive, I was responding directly to that. Call him what he is, a Socialist. It would only be legit communists that would see Bernie as too Conservative.
There you go again. You didn't say call Bernie a socialist when I called him progressive.

You also want to only link being progressive to being socialist.

The left, like it's an organisation and everyone who has a view left of centre is member reading from the same script.

Your last line I think shows how narrow your views are.

You think anyone who would like Bernie to be further left is a communist, judging t that you think the far left are all communists. So i guess the CCP is far left then..... They must be big on human rights then yeah?

You do realise progress means change yeah? That whole left wants progress and right wants order thing? Progressive vs conservative?

Are you against public schooling and public healthcare? Are you against having public roads that you can use without having to pay? Footpaths? Parks?

We already have socialist elements in our society that most conservatives seem to take for granted and happily use, in Australia at least.

It's usually only certain types of social reform that people are against, and news flash there are people that would think of themselves as on the left or progressive that would also be against some of those reforms. Just like there are people that think of themselves as on the right or conservative that would like to see them brought in.

I never said Bernie wasn't a socialist btw.
 
There you go again. You didn't say call Bernie a socialist when I called him progressive.

You also want to only link being progressive to being socialist.

The left, like it's an organisation and everyone who has a view left of centre is member reading from the same script.

Your last line I think shows how narrow your views are.

You think anyone who would like Bernie to be further left is a communist, judging t that you think the far left are all communists. So i guess the CCP is far left then..... They must be big on human rights then yeah?

You do realise progress means change yeah? That whole left wants progress and right wants order thing? Progressive vs conservative?

Are you against public schooling and public healthcare? Are you against having public roads that you can use without having to pay? Footpaths? Parks?

We already have socialist elements in our society that most conservatives seem to take for granted and happily use, in Australia at least.

It's usually only certain types of social reform that people are against, and news flash there are people that would think of themselves as on the left or progressive that would also be against some of those reforms. Just like there are people that think of themselves as on the right or conservative that would like to see them brought in.

I never said Bernie wasn't a socialist btw.

I started a response and then I read this.

Could not have put it better. :thumbsu:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rita Panahi

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top