Preview R:8 - Swans v Giants - 1:45pm SCG - Saturday 4 May

[Dubai Quacker]

View attachment 1977122

4 doubtless bald-headed flog-drongos

 

[BloodySwan]

Parker will be in next week, there's no doubt about it. Against the Giants midfield we can't afford to have an underdone Parker running around

 

[Swannie0307]

4 doubtless bald-headed flog-drongos

Good point DQ, why are most of the umps chrome domes?? And they all pile on the Mr Sheen too

 

[JackHiscoxWasFast]

View attachment 1977122

That’s another 3 votes for Heeney from Williamson. Blondes stick together.

 

[The King!]

GWS video was funny

 

[JackHiscoxWasFast]

The bookies love that Rampe is in. $1.78 v $2.03 firming favourites.

 

[ashep]

Surprised Parker isn't back but there's not a chance in hell he's not considered best 22.

 

[Neverwas]

It will be a huge win to overcome the Giants after a 6 day break in the wet. I live in hope though.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

 

[Wheresbuddy]

What is the rule around an emergency coming in? What's the latest it can be done and are their any specifics around replacing a selected player with an emergency?

 

[Kolah]

No doubt the question has already been asked, but why exactly are we playing three talls in the wet?



Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[monopoly19]

We had the same 3 talls the last time we played the Giants in the wet. It went alright, 6 goals between McLean and Amartey although Logan was subbed off that night.

 

[wills2g]

ah drats no cognilio

midfield battle will be immense now, finn callaghan stays as a mid

 

[Wolfgang West]

Greene might kick 5 then

So who would you play on him ? If he kicks 5 on Rampe **** knows what he would do to a Fox or Cunningham.

 

[Wolfgang West]

Yeah. He's too good for Fox and while I'd back Cunningham against him in a wet game I'm not sure he can go with him in the air if it's dry.

He is far too smart a player for either IMO
MF.

 

[RedBloodBlackSwan]

He went absolutely nuts when Chol took that mark even tho we were 12 goals up.

I loved that. I suspect it was for Blakey losing contact of his man and having an air swing for his spoil

 

[The King!]

So who would you play on him ? If he kicks 5 on Rampe **** knows what he would do to a Fox or Cunningham.

Look heck knows, it's a big ask off best part of a month off to ask a 34 year old to play on him.

Midfield need to limit his supply , maybe I play someone creative on him and try to make him work defensively like florent blakey Hayward

I'd give fox first crack though

 

[caesar88]

We had the same 3 talls the last time we played the Giants in the wet. It went alright, 6 goals between McLean and Amartey although Logan was subbed off that night.

Not to mention GWS are playing four talls. Geelong played three talls in the wet against Brisbane a few weeks back.

Reading this board you'd swear we're the only team that plays three talls in the comp.

 

[RubbaDuck]

I thought Amartey had one of his better performances yesterday. Was surprised to see he only had 3 touches.

My guess is Campbell will be dropped, he's clearly already on the out but did well when he came on.

Who I'd make as the sub? No clue

He did a few nice things that led to others' goals.

 

[RubbaDuck]

Okay smartie! Nobody else notices that huge screw up and now you've gone and blabbed it out loud everyone will know I can't count and/or read a calendar! Lol!


Fixed!

Ha ha, Sucker! No-one picked up that I put the wrong date in my preview of the Pies game.

Oh wait, damn, you tricked me. Now I've gone and told everyone.

 

[RubbaDuck]

Florent would be a good match for Greene and in his current form, actually keep the feisty Giant accountable defensively. Rowie first go on Green given he is their prime mover at the coal face.

I can never remember which of the Greens spells their name wrong.

 

[The King!]

I can never remember which of the Greens spells their name wrong.

Brown

 

[RubbaDuck]

Not to mention GWS are playing four talls. Geelong played three talls in the wet against Brisbane a few weeks back.

Reading this board you'd swear we're the only team that plays three talls in the comp.

As long as our talls are nimble enough to compete on the deck. Amartey's got lightning pace for a tall and McDonald's great below his knees, often crumbing goals. McLean and Grundy love to rag-doll opposition players in what will be a very physical encounter. They also give us marking targets around the ground, which will come in handy when we're inevitably forced to kick down the line.

Without enough talls inside 50 the Giant's tall defenders will mop up anything that comes in high. We need the talls to mark or at least bring the ball to ground for our smalls and midfielders to feast upon the spoils. Hayward needs to keep the third tall defender busy and stop easy intercepts.

 

[RubbaDuck]

Brown

I didn't know there were three Greens, or that one of them was colour-blind

 

[RubbaDuck]

That's the way I see it. We're definitely a better team with Parker in this week but not by enough to justify bringing him back before he's completely ready. It will be a very physical game.

Good to see Horse keeping one eye on the finals and taking a page from Chris Scott's playbook. Bank early wins lets you look after your best, most experienced players, resting them and keeping them in prime condition while giving young guys a chance to step up.

Finishing the H&A season top four with our best players primed and in really good nick is much more important than winning bragging rights at a derby.

 

[anotherletdown]

The bookies love that Rampe is in. $1.78 v $2.03 firming favourites.

Or is that because Parker is out ?