Oppo Camp Non-Essendon Football Thread XVII

Remove this Banner Ad

I couldn't give a shit what people laugh at. That's not my point.
Well you seem to be saying that a particular historic event is ethically off limits from humour based on the suffering involved. I'm trying to demonstrate that your argument simply doesn't hold, by asking you to critically assess your own humour to realise that you yourself find humour in a myriad of human suffering. I obviously don't know you but (as far as I know) you are human and it's just a part of human nature.
 
Well you seem to be saying that a particular historic event is ethically off limits from humour based on the suffering involved. I'm trying to demonstrate that your argument simply doesn't hold, by asking you to critically assess your own humour to realise that you yourself find humour in a myriad of human suffering. I obviously don't know you but (as far as I know) you are human and it's just a part of human nature.
He isn't saying that at all. 🤔
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Well you seem to be saying that a particular historic event is ethically off limits from humour based on the suffering involved. I'm trying to demonstrate that your argument simply doesn't hold, by asking you to critically assess your own humour to realise that you yourself find humour in a myriad of human suffering. I obviously don't know you but (as far as I know) you are human and it's just a part of human nature.
I updated my post above if you really want to stick to that topic, which I wasn't.
 
It is not ethically wrong to find humour from suffering. It's been a part of human nature and existence since time immemorial. I'm sure if you're honest with yourself you've made or laughed at countless jokes or comedy shows/movies/stand-ups about war, famine, vikings, Hitler, fraud, theft, or someone stubbing their toe. Human suffering is clearly bad. Finding humour in it is not.


I agree, nothing is immune from being joked about not at an ethical level, but the funny stuff I am talking about does not touch on the human suffering. It's mockery of the narrative and the criminals who were involved in executive and/or the cover up.
 
I agree, nothing is immune from being joked about not at an ethical level, but the funny stuff I am talking about does not touch on the human suffering. It's mockery of the narrative and the criminals who were involved in executive and/or the cover up.
Can't pretend I'm on the same page as you re 9/11 but I think we agree on the sentiment; there's no subject that is too taboo to find humour in, but the ethics of it depends on the spirit of the joke.
 
We want personalities and characters in the game. Of course those same personalities and characters need to not ever dip their toes across our ever changing moral code of decency.

I mean if you can't make a joke that doesn't offend a single person ever in the history of the world can you actually even be funny?

The AFL do an amazing job at sweeping little issues under the rug (Clarkson's attempts to save his players on the outrageous costs of DayCare for example) or turning a blind eye on things (like the rampant illicit drug use amongst its own staff and don't even get me started on the player base) or being willfully obtuse (like promoting "men's mental health" while sucking on the teet of gambling companies who are preying on young men all over the world and inflicting immeasurable damage on society as a whole) but there's only so many things the AFL can and will accept. And if you think they are going to let a couple of blokes make inappropriate jokes at a private function then you are dreaming.
 
I couldn't give a shit what people laugh at. That's not my point.

Also what you've written is pretty simplistic. Are we laughing at victims? Are we laughing at ourselves as victims? there's a bit of nuance involved here I would think.
Well yeah that's exactly my point really. The spirit of the joke is what counts (i.e. who/what are we laughing at?) not the subject.
 
What the **** have I walked into this morning?

Tinfoil Hat GIF by The Tick
Exactly.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

but I think we agree on the sentiment; there's no subject that is too taboo to find humour in, but the ethics of it depends on the spirit of the joke.
Rape and paedophilia? How do you get ‘spirit’ into that joke?
 
Then there was the sculptor Michael Richards who created a sculpture of himself in 1999 before being a victim of the Twin Towers collapse;
View attachment 2147097
Gerling had to hold back the release of their second album, "When young terrorists chase the sun", and then changed the name to Head2cleaner.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Non-Essendon Football Thread XVII

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top