NBL 23/24/25 Season Thread

[PJays]

That is a terrible look for the NBL. It just makes them look like they handed out punishments to gain notoriety and for advertising.

Out of curiosity, is the 'full board' Adelaide can appeal to run by the NBL or BA? If it's the NBL, there's little point in complaining, because you'd just be complaining to Melbourne about Melbourne.

If it's BA, they should 100% appeal and really question the motivation behind the sanction.

What do you think Harrell and Davis' penalties should've been?

 

[brucetiki]

What do you think Harrell and Davis' penalties should've been?

Given the NBL's motivation behind the penalties, they should be reduced to fines.

If the NBL wasn't using the suspensions to promote the game, the penalties would be fair enough - just cop them and move on.

You can't suspend players, then use the incident to promote the league

 

[PJays]

Given the NBL's motivation behind the penalties,

Why are those alleged motivations relevant to determining the penalties?

they should be reduced to fines.

to clarify, you think no Adelaide player is deserving of any suspension for anything that took place during that game?

 

[From The Pocket]

One spectator has received a lifetime ban, and one spectator has received a 10-year ban, from all NBL games in all venues.

https://nbl.com.au/news/spectators-receive-bans

 

[brucetiki]

One spectator has received a lifetime ban, and one spectator has received a 10-year ban, from all NBL games in all venues.

https://nbl.com.au/news/spectators-receive-bans

This took far too long to sort out but the correct penalties have been handed out