Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 7 - Pride Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Those figures are very deceptive
Firstly wages make up a fair percentage of the total costs therefore we do very badly their as our guys are paid more than nearly all the other countries relatively
Secondly not all millitary spending is attributed to defence, we are very transparent the other countries are not.
Spain and Canada would spend more than us.
Seriously, why does France even have an army?
What about Thailand? Why in hell would they pose a security threat to Australia? Singapore? Taiwan (a US ally)? Argentina? Why? How?
Many questions, not many answers with acker.
There are only two nations, two not 14, who pose any remote possibility of a threat to our security, China and Indonesia, but as I have already explained, these threats are small at best. Australia has not been invaded or attacked in 60 years, with Australia having good military, economic and political relations with these two nations, that aint changing.
How can Taiwan be a U.S ally when the U.S does not recognise it as a sovereign nation.
Your letting the personal attacks get in the way of truth Richo.
Take a panadol sport.
How can Taiwan be a U.S ally when the U.S does not recognise it as a sovereign nation.
Your letting the personal attacks get in the way of truth Richo.
Take a panadol sport.
that wouldn't be the taiwan getting US and french weapon systems on a regular basis right?
as for attacking anyone, their population is comparable to ours and their GDP about 1/2 of australia's, while they have a substantial defence force, its a lingering hangover regarding a chinese take over and a fair wack of it is conscript or national service.
their capacity to invade another country is non existant.
their whole defence is around making china bleed should they attack.
The US have been providing Taiwan with military equipment for decades now, not bad for a country who isn't even an ally.
The US have been providing Taiwan with military equipment for decades now, not bad for a country who isn't even an ally.
Ludicrious.
The US have been providing Taiwan with armament and aid donations for years now, the US is one of Taiwan's major trading partiners and allies. You should know that if you're going to rant about national defense.
Infact the fact that Taiwan still has democratic elections and China has allowed it is because of US intervention.
So yes, Taiwan IS a US ally and the US would be annoyed if it recklessly started attacking one of it's major allies in the region, no doubt.
U.S.-TAIWAN RELATIONS
On January 1, 1979, the United States changed its diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. In the U.S.-P.R.C. Joint Communiqué that announced the change, the United States recognized the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal government of China and acknowledged the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China. The Joint Communiqué also stated that within this context the people of the United States will maintain cultural, commercial, and other unofficial relations with the people on Taiwan.
On April 10, 1979, President Carter signed into law the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which created domestic legal authority for the conduct of unofficial relations with Taiwan. U.S. commercial, cultural, and other interaction with the people on Taiwan is facilitated through the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), a private nonprofit corporation. The Institute has its headquarters in the Washington, DC area and has offices in Taipei and Kaohsiung. It is authorized to issue visas, accept passport applications, and provide assistance to U.S. citizens in Taiwan. A counterpart organization, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States (TECRO), has been established by the Taiwan authorities. It has its headquarters in Taipei, the representative branch office in Washington, DC, and 11 other Taipei Economic and Cultural Offices (TECO) in the continental U.S. and Guam. The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) continues to provide the legal basis for the unofficial relationship between the U.S. and Taiwan, and enshrines the U.S. commitment to assisting Taiwan maintain its defensive capability.
Following de-recognition, the United States terminated its Mutual Defense Treaty with Taiwan. However, the United States has continued the sale of appropriate defensive military equipment to Taiwan in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act, which provides for such sales and which declares that peace and stability in the area are in U.S. interests. Sales of defensive military equipment are also consistent with the 1982 U.S.-P.R.C. Joint Communiqué.
The United States position on Taiwan is reflected in the Three Communiqués and the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA). The U.S. insists on the peaceful resolution of cross-Strait differences and encourages dialogue to help advance such an outcome. The U.S. does not support Taiwan independence. President Bush stated on December 9, 2003 that the United States is opposed to any attempt by either side to unilaterally alter the status quo in the Taiwan Strait. While the United States welcomes recent exchanges that enhance channels of communication between leaders in Beijing and Taipei, the United States urges Beijing and Taipei to further advance cross-Strait cooperation and dialogue, including direct discussions between the authorities in Beijing and elected leaders in Taipei.
U.S. commercial ties with Taiwan have been maintained and have expanded since 1979. Taiwan continues to enjoy Export-Import Bank financing, Overseas Private Investment Corporation guarantees, normal trade relations (NTR) status, and ready access to U.S. markets. In recent years, AIT commercial dealings with Taiwan have focused on expanding market access for American goods and services. AIT has been engaged in a series of trade discussions, which have focused on protection of intellectual property rights and market access for U.S. goods and services.
Maintaining diplomatic relations with the P.R.C. has been recognized to be in the long-term interest of the United States by seven consecutive administrations; however, maintaining strong, unofficial relations with Taiwan also a major U.S. goal, in line with our desire to further peace and stability in Asia. In keeping with our one China policy, the U.S. does not support Taiwan independence, but it does support Taiwan's membership in appropriate international organizations, such as the World Trade Organization, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, and the Asian Development Bank, where statehood is not a requirement for membership. In addition, the U.S. supports appropriate opportunities for Taiwan's voice to be heard in organizations where its membership is not possible.
Quite apart from the sheer stupidity of arguing that a nations whos defence policy is soley based on destroying an invading force can attack Australia....to suggest that the US is not an ally with Taiwain is simply nonsensical. They tread a very fine line between keeping the PRC happy and a commitment to a historical partner, yet it is quite clear a special relationship exists between Taiwain and the US.You should know if you are going to rant about US Foreign policy and defence what status Taiwan is with the U.S.
From the US State department website.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35855.htm
As I said it is pretty hard to be an ally of a nation you don't recognise as a nation.
They may have paid for and received some military hardware from the U.S under the sales of defensive military equipment are also consistent with the 1982 U.S.-P.R.C. Joint Communiqué.
Quite apart from the sheer stupidity of arguing that a nations whos defence policy is soley based on destroying an invading force can attack Australia....to suggest that the US is not an ally with Taiwain is simply nonsensical. They tread a very fine line between keeping the PRC happy and a commitment to a historical partner, yet it is quite clear a special relationship exists between Taiwain and the US.
If they (Taiwan) have a defence policy solely based on destroying an invading force why are they sending the warship which according to you should be solely protecting Taiwan, on a "goodwill visit" into the South Pacific?Quite apart from the sheer stupidity of arguing that a nations whos defence policy is soley based on destroying an invading force
shyte
taiwan is looking for friends.
the solomon islands is hardly going to provide military support to taiwan, nor is taiwan interested in making enemies.
The Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI) is a partnership between the Government and people of Solomon Islands and the contributing countries of the Pacific region. It is a long-term exercise aimed at helping create the conditions necessary for a return to stability, peace and a growing economy.
fromLast week the government bypassed a RAMSI training program by sending 12 Solomons police officers to Taiwan for training in close personal protection.
the only way taiwan poses a threat to Australia is if they declare independance and the chinese mugwamp them and the US rushes to their aid and we drawn in.
Taiwan would never do anything to insult australia for a number of reasons. the first being australia is an ally of the US and taiwan perceives or hopes that the US would provide some sort of political if not military shield against China.
fromANDREW GEOGHEGAN: Joses Tuhanuku, who lost his seat to the former Solomon Islands Ambassador to Taiwan, has no doubt about the corruption claims.
JOSES TUHANUKU: Well it’s common knowledge here that the election of the Prime Minister was not a fair and free one. It has been corrupted by Taiwan and business houses owned by Solomon Islanders of Chinese origin.
ANDREW GEOGHEGAN: Last night Prime Minister John Howard made a veiled reference to those Taiwanese links to the Solomons.
JOHN HOWARD: We should remember that there are countries other than countries that are geographically part of the region which have an interest in involving themselves and gathering allies and partners in the region, not necessarily with the longer term interests of the region at heart.
ANDREW GEOGHEGAN: The Opposition Spokesman for Pacific Island Affairs, Bob Sercombe, has similar concerns.
BOB SERCOMBE: I think one of the concerns is Taiwanese aid directly to the Solomon Islands Government. And of course, unlike Australia, the Solomon Islands has diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than with Beijing.
I think the area that’s of more concern is probably not any direct support to the Solomon Islands Government, it is concerns about claims that the Taiwanese make payments directly to individual members of parliament for use as some sort of election slush fund and concerns about the accountabilities for those funds and whether there are any strings attached.
The Solomon islands had appointed a wanted peadophile fugitive from Australia (Julian Moti) as its Attorney General at the time.
It was making what Australia at the time would consider "a bad friend" as you put it. It was also hindering our foreign policy in implementing "RAMSI"
from
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/solomons-pm-accuses-australia-of-bullying/2007/01/22/1169330817383.html
No !
I would consider getting in our way to try to re build law and order in a nearby Pacific neighboring country.
That considering it appointed a wanted Australian child sex predator as its Attorney General.
Was at risk of going the extra yard and becoming a sovereign state safe haven for peadophiles and other criminals from Australia and elsewhere around the world looking for a home. The Solomon economy was starting to look like it was going to be based on kick backs from these crim's and their more tolerent friend of choice, Taiwan's; aid in return for some favors in the U.N.
Well they did (exerpt from abc "the world today" 20th April 2006)
from
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1619951.htm
so basically you agree that taiwan is trying to buy friends?
as for getting shirty with Australia, taiwan is definately NOT interested in p1ssing off Australia.
as for a sovereign state for paedophiles, anywhere where money and influence can be exerted, so do paedophiles congregate, as well as other criminals.
solomons is a very poor nation, where real currency can buy you just about anything.
its not that different in south america or even central america where wealthy americans and canadians visit.
heck Australians sicko's have been visiting the pacific islands and SE asia for decades.
I don't think its anything to do specifically with the solomon islands, rather the exertion of wealth and power.
crims in the solomons? hello, 3/4 of the smaller islands in indonesia are run by military gangsters where you can buy and sell anything you like as long as the military gets its slice of pie.
even sadly australia we are seeing money and power can allow people to almost anything they like with impunity.
as for foreign countries exerting power, japan, america even australia has been exerting political influence in the pacific for decades.
The Solomon islands had appointed a wanted peadophile fugitive from Australia (Julian Moti) as its Attorney General at the time.http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1619951.htm
six disturbing statements [the complainant] made over ... four months. All are in English, though it appears she only spoke French. None was in her own writing. None was sworn. The underlying story doesn't change from statement to statement, but details are contradictory. Others appear fanciful. She claimed he had three testicles, but Port Vila GP Dr Frank Spooner would later examine Moti and concluded he had two.... Dates are changed; at one stage she withdrew her allegations entirely, then renewed them a few weeks later saying her previous statement was 'not of my own free will' and asked police to investigate. In several statements she described being beaten and r*ped by Moti but in others that she loved him. 'I wanted to say that I love Julian Moti very much,' she stated in March 1998. 'He is a reach [rich] man he can take me anywhere I wanted and this is my belief of my future with Julian because he is so kind....'[5]
Political fit-up job.
I am confident that once in an Australian court of law Moti will be acquitted. This is how Downer tried to punish the Solomon's for daring to try send RAMSI and the Australian diplomatic mission packing over their interference in the Solomon's sovereignty. IT was the most shabby piece of neo-colonial bullshit that I have ever witnessed in my life-time. I happen to know somebody related to Moti's defence lawyer and they are adamant that this is a politically motivated fit-up job.
Why the Moti case was thrown out of the Vanuatu courts:
your posts are laughable and paranoid.
their statesmenship is something that is no threat to Australia.
I'd be more worried about North Korean money and drugs flowing through the pacific.
Why dont you just say "I dont agree" dan
Without running off at the mouth with the character assasination attempt.
no I was referring to your post, not to you.
I just assume you are playing devil's advocate with regard to a taiwanese threat to Australian political influence.
now taiwanese fishing may be different matter