Speculation Miles Bergman

[Ash1337]

Would port do Bergman and a second for bombers first pick? I think his skill set is definitely a need at the bombers

Essendon now have a NGA coming in that maybe bid on in the 2nd round.

 

[Del28562]

Bergman has Corey enright written all over him. Port aren't letting him go, he's a star. They might use Houston to get a pick to draft draper

 

[Enviable Tradition]

A pick 19-20 isn’t reasonable?

For a young pick 14 who is playing well above expectations for that pick.

Absolutely not.

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Bald]

For a young pick 14 who is playing well above expectations for that pick.

Absolutely not.

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app

Is he playing well above expectations? News to me!

 

[Mojorisin]

I'd imagine his trade value to be not too different to that of Barrass considering he is contracted.
A pick in the mid teens and a second rounder for Bergman and a third.

 

[rye]

decent player but dont know what people are seeing that would make them want to pay overs for his services

 

[Pure_Ownage]

Bergman has Corey enright written all over him. Port aren't letting him go, he's a star. They might use Houston to get a pick to draft draper

Houston isnt getting them a top 5 pick.

 

[Enviable Tradition]

Is he playing well above expectations? News to me!

Try watching him play.

Did you watch last night?

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Bald]

Try watching him play.

Did you watch last night?

On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app

I have seen him play - he’s a good player, but he hasn’t done so much that he’s worth more than his draft position. I did not watch last night, expecting anyone that’s neutral to watch a 112 point game is weird.

 

[CatToTheFuture]

A decent second rounder I'd think is his worth.

Would be daylight robbery. I'd say a pick in the teens

 

[CatToTheFuture]

I have seen him play - he’s a good player, but he hasn’t done so much that he’s worth more than his draft position. I did not watch last night, expecting anyone that’s neutral to watch a 112 point game is weird.

He's performing around his original draft position in a very strong draft class. I'd normalise that up

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

If I was Bulldogs id 100% be all over replacing Bailey Smith

3

Bailey Smith

Age

24

Ht

185cm

Wt

86kg

Pos.

M/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

18.3

5star

K

8.5

3star

HB

9.8

5star

M

2.3

2star

T

3.8

5star

CL

2.7

4star

D

19.8

5star

K

9.6

4star

HB

10.2

5star

M

1.8

2star

T

3.2

4star

CL

3.2

4star

D

14.8

4star

K

7.6

3star

HB

7.2

5star

M

2.0

3star

T

3.4

5star

CL

1.6

4star

with this guy.

 

[Pure_Ownage]

He's performing around his original draft position in a very strong draft class. I'd normalise that up

Pick 10-20 would do.

 

[Mundusa]

If I was Bulldogs id 100% be all over replacing Bailey Smith with this guy.

He would be a good get for their needs. I'd rather have Bergman than Smith.

 

[Ash1337]

I hope Bulldogs are looking at him. He'll be that wing that dogs need or a Duryea replacement. He's worth probably a late first or 2 2nd round picks on the market but really he's worth more than to Port.

 

[Oisin_the_Goat]

He would be a good get for their needs. I'd rather have Bergman than Smith.

Tbh Cats need to fix their midfield however also need a new ruck. If Sam Dekoning becomes our permanent new ruck we have a gaping hole in the back line. Which is why I wouldnt mind us considering Bergman. SDK is pretty good in the ruck with follow up work etc. Needs to put some size on though.

 

[jakson68]

Just throwing it out there.
Bergman and Ports future first, for Pie's future first.

Port mid teens, Pies top five.

Then use ports pick for young Tom.

 

[Bulldogs85]

Just throwing it out there.
Bergman and Ports future first, for Pie's future first.

Port mid teens, Pies top five.

Then use ports pick for young Tom.

Why on earth would Port Adelaide do that awful trade

 

[jackag24]

Just throwing it out there.
Bergman and Ports future first, for Pie's future first.

Port mid teens, Pies top five.

Then use ports pick for young Tom.

That's a terrible deal considering your talking about future picks...

It could be Bergman + pick 12 for pick 10...

That's insane

 

[Mojorisin]

That's a terrible deal considering your talking about future picks...

It could be Bergman + pick 12 for pick 10...

That's insane

Could be Bergman plus 5 for 15 aswell (however unlikely), the Shultz deal should make clubs more cautious.

 

[jackag24]

Could be Bergman plus 5 for 15 aswell (however unlikely), the Shultz deal should make clubs more cautious.

The whole uncertainty of the deal makes it terrible for Port, but it would always favor Collingwood (unless they finished dead last)

 

[jakson68]

That's a terrible deal considering your talking about future picks...

It could be Bergman + pick 12 for pick 10...

That's insane

Obviously, you haven't seen our track record with future picks.

 

[Bald]

Just throwing it out there.
Bergman and Ports future first, for Pie's future first.

Port mid teens, Pies top five.

Then use ports pick for young Tom.

Are Collingwood actually able to trade their future first?

 

[jakson68]

Are Collingwood actually able to trade their future first?

I am not sure 100% of the rulings.
I thought we had to have a first round, whether that was a swapped one or not, I am unsure.
But I know if we track similar to this year and have a pick in the top 5 or so, we will offload it, so we dont burn it on our F/S.

 

[Bald]

I am not sure 100% of the rulings.
I thought we had to have a first round, whether that was a swapped one or not, I am unsure.
But I know if we track similar to this year and have a pick in the top 5 or so, we will offload it, so we dont burn it on our F/S.

I can't seem to find anything concrete on it, it was my understanding that you had to use 1 first round pick in a 2 year period, and if you trade your 2025 one without acquiring another one for 2024 then you won't have used one in both 2024 or 25 (assuming that you don't get one in 25). Ahh it's all so confusing.