so he is pretty much the sterotype Port recruit of the Ken era.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. List Management 2023-24
- Thread starter Bevoman
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Thats what worries me.
Luko has the potential to be a star at the right club in the right system.
GC and Port (under Ken) are not that.
Under Carr or Hardwick though...
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Oct 8, 2004
- 18,539
- 25,381
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Port urges AFL to loosen trade rules to unlock mega deals
Port Adelaide's list boss Chris Davies says allowing clubs to trade out more future picks will free up more player movement
www.afl.com.au
JakeNeadeFan
Norm Smith Medallist
- Nov 25, 2019
- 5,297
- 10,717
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Lukosious is signed until free agency and I imagine we will target him as a free agent.
Better ways to spend our cap I think
I have to agree - to a degree! It is still early days, so jury is still out on Williams, but it has been a great start for him. All the negatives that people might have on him, ie speed, fitness, field kicking, defensive pressure, tackling etc, have so far been dispelled. If he keeps this up, he gets a nice new contract.
Ps ... Dylan has worked hard on his game, has taken all the advice I have given as his buddy, and run with it. I for one am very proud of him!
I wonder what change they are looking for?Port urges AFL to loosen trade rules to unlock mega deals
Port Adelaide's list boss Chris Davies says allowing clubs to trade out more future picks will free up more player movement
They could extend it out to 5 or 6 years worth of first rounders to even it out.
Or they could consider players traded in their first 3 years to be the equivalent of the round they were picked in.
I.e. trading in JHF counts as using a 1st rounder in that 4 year period.
I don't think their should be any reactivation on 3rd rounders on and little if any on 2nd rounders either.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Oct 8, 2004
- 18,539
- 25,381
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
CLUBS will not be able to replace a retired player at the AFL Mid-Season Rookie Draft without a completed deed of release form, as the AFL tightens its inactive player rules.
The mid-season draft will be held on Wednesday, May 31, between rounds 11 and 12, with clubs again to make their selections via an online format and the draft to be conducted out of the AFL's Review Centre.
www.afl.com.au
The mid-season draft will be held on Wednesday, May 31, between rounds 11 and 12, with clubs again to make their selections via an online format and the draft to be conducted out of the AFL's Review Centre.
AFL tightens inactive player rules ahead of mid-season draft
The AFL has moved to tighten its inactive player rules ahead of the mid-season draft in May
www.afl.com.au
Sounds ok in theory, but also a potential disaster of a coach desperate for a contract selling the future to overpay for immediate results. Gee, wouldn't want to be a club like thatPort urges AFL to loosen trade rules to unlock mega deals
Port Adelaide's list boss Chris Davies says allowing clubs to trade out more future picks will free up more player movement
Yeah. I like.
up the offer CD, at worst we make them pay to keep him.
Does the non selection of Mitch have something to do with his contract status?
Could it be:
A. We know he's leaving so choosing to develop Lord/others over him.
B. Still hoping to keep him, hiding him from having a big day in front of a decimated West Coast is an attempt to kept their contract offer down.
C. Nothing decided yet, nothing to see, leaving him in the Magoos to work on his confidence in front of goal. While playing Lord with Teakle helps cover the ruck
Personally I'd be amazed if he doesn't know where he's going to be next year.
Could it be:
A. We know he's leaving so choosing to develop Lord/others over him.
B. Still hoping to keep him, hiding him from having a big day in front of a decimated West Coast is an attempt to kept their contract offer down.
C. Nothing decided yet, nothing to see, leaving him in the Magoos to work on his confidence in front of goal. While playing Lord with Teakle helps cover the ruck
Personally I'd be amazed if he doesn't know where he's going to be next year.
Julia#13
Team Captain
I'd absolutely offer Williams a 2 yr contract. He's been very solid in defence, we need good depth and he'd be very cheap. 2 x 350 would be a good piece of business for us. And he hasn't reached his ceiling either. Still young and building so it could potentially look like a bargain in a few years
D. His kicking for goal continues to be crappy.
Last edited:
If Georgiades can get us an proven AFL quality ruck or KPD you do the deal.
hypothetically, who?
Sean Darcy
Brennan cox
Freo need another forward
And now with Jackson they prob don’t need Darcy as much
And they have quite a few tall backs
Port would be hard pressed to either of them out of Freo and I’m not sure if MG would bring that much draft value.
Either would be a pretty handy pickups though.
Hows Will Verrall going in the VFL?
He can't be wrapped with the Grundy acquisition.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
He can't be wrapped with the Grundy acquisition.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Ford Fairlane
Moderator
- Feb 21, 2002
- 82,047
- 202,568
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
- Moderator
- #472
I would hope we aren't giving a contract if he can't play. But who knows it will probably be a rookie contact
Sent from my motorola edge 30 pro using Tapatalk
- Jan 14, 2008
- 11,573
- 6,929
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics, Man City, NY Jets
Would take Raz on a Rookie deal for good money.
Looks like a 13 year old boy still, so why not?
Who gonna be bigger by the end of the year, Raz or Action Jackson?
