Agreed.Smith >>>> Daylight >>>>> Birchall![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 7
SuperCoach Rd 7 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 7 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Agreed.Smith >>>> Daylight >>>>> Birchall![]()
Come on people. If you don't actually watch football, you aren't qualified to comment.
Birchall has one of the highest kicking efficiency percentages in the AFL.
Smith may be better, and he may not, but if Birchall has any flaws in his game, his kicking ability isn't one of them.
These above posts simply demonstrate that these two posters have NFI.

This thread is just a load of hyperbole over some kid that finished behind two other kids in an award that rewards the best young player.
Smith is a good young kid....that is all and there is no logical argument to suggest that he is anything other than that at this point in time.
yet he tore your side a new one in the biggest game of their lives. seems like your underating his abillity a fair bit

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
This quote reminds me.I would prefer Smith over everyone over Hawhtorn's list bar buddy. He has shwon he has the courage and skill to outperform his opponents in big games see the semi final where he got more possessions than Hodge and Birchall combined 2 of the hawks supposed "stars". Birchall isn't a bad player but he's extremely one dimensional who's kicking lets him down, he's made to look better by the fact he got 500 touches this year, not bad for a kid in his 2nd year but this is mainly due to Al Clarkson's ugly game plan of chipping it round in the back ground when their gameplan breaks down
That makes sense.Is this even a debate?
Getting 18 possessions chipping around Hawthorns often flooded defence doesn't make someone a good player. Smith is miles better and has shown as such. In the semi final he was a class above any Hawthorn player and is only going to get better.
Smith easily.

That makes sense.
Hawthorn play like crap, get bundled out of the finals, and Smith plays a good game = Smith is better than Birchall.
I guess we'll just ignore the week before hand in both players cases? Or any other games for that matter?
although hodge and mitchell both are far out ahead of smith and frankly shouldnt be compaired at all, you dawks need to stop using injuries as excuse that hodge didnt perform against the roos.
theres an old saying in professional sport, "if you injured dont play, if you choose to play, then dont use injury as an excuse". mind you that doesnt mean hodge wasnt injured, just means he chose to play and failed to perform, dont use injury as an excuse.

We're talking about rating players.what like the hawks supporters do when discussing how they beat geelong in 07??
Personally I would think that Smith has potential to be much better than Williams and Roughead, and better slightly than Brown. Are you serious Brown is just coming in to his place and is an All Oz, hell of a big call, and Roughy you cant compare, two different position players,different responsabilities in a game. If you put it down to something like Brownlow votes over a career then Roughead becasue his play is explosive and catches the eye. Can kick a packet of goals.
TC![]()
Wih one eye closed.I actually would rather Smith to Brown, Williams, Roughead, etc. Only time will tell if he is a more talented player than Mitchell, though the early signs are promising. Read above and then give the Crystals a rub Claude, they've gone hazey
It is blatantly obvious that he is better than Birchall.

We're talking about rating players.
What has the fact that Geelong didn't beat us in 2007, and whether or not they won or lost the week before got to do with this discussion?
Read the thread Champ. Birchall or Smith? Don't have to talk about Grand Finals.as you say that birchall and smith can't be compared by a single game, yet there are countless hawks supporters who claim that they would have won the premiership if they were in the grand final on the basis that they beat geelong by 3pts in round 5. they conclude from this that hawks>geelong
as you say that birchall and smith can't be compared by a single game, yet there are countless hawks supporters who claim that they would have won the premiership if they were in the grand final on the basis that they beat geelong by 3pts in round 5. they conclude from this that hawks>geelong
Smith is good I will give you that. But how is he better?

as you say that birchall and smith can't be compared by a single game, yet there are countless hawks supporters who claim that they would have won the premiership if they were in the grand final on the basis that they beat geelong by 3pts in round 5. they conclude from this that hawks>geelong
Yes you are right this conclusion is a bit unfair so lets go back one game further. We pumped them by 10 goals down at Kitty park and there team was not much different to what they had in 2007! The game before this Hawks won again. Hodge has had the wood over Bartel, Ablett and co during there junior days he was clearly the best and these boys just can't get over this mental barrier.
)You are a disgrace. No logic. Cmon. Hodge is one of the elite midfielders in the comp. Jessie smith over the extractor. You are a fool. I would take Birchall over Jessie Smith. That is my opinion. He too brakes lines (elimination final against Crows) takes grabs and is honest as the day is long. Get real.
