Independent report into Hobart's proposed new stadium has found the costs of the project have been significantly underestimated

Remove this Banner Ad

Oct 8, 2004
18,655
25,490
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Liverpool
 

Log in to remove this ad.

But if they don't build that stadium I reckon call the whole thing off. Like Adelaide, it will only work if a world-class stadium within waking distance of the city.
They are still going ahead.

When was the last time a major government building project was close to budget?

Do they look to make savings on the design though? Wooden roof may not be the cheapest option.

If it's built, makes them more viable to get more Test matches.
 
It's not so much that there will be cost blow-outs, but that the figures used overestimated the value of the land they would sell and didn't include some major costs. Cost blow-outs will happen after it starts.

The Tassie government have fudged the figures to get the green light and said bugger the consequences. Disgraceful.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Tassie is in desperate need of an entertainment hub in order to get some semblance of relevance on even a national scale. Stage 1 should be the oval stadium, stage 2 a multi-purpose basketball stadium

Even with a stadium, it won't happen - it's WAY too expensive to bring equipment across the Bass Straight.

It would be cheaper for major acts to pay airfares to fly Tasmanian's to a Melbourne gig than to move their equipment down for what could only be a one-off show.
 
For $1 billion, you’d think they could have a better design.

Didn’t Albanese give $600 million for Papua New Guinea’s NRL team, yet will only give Tasmania $200 million?

That’s because PNG is a defense ploy against china.

They didn’t give it 600m just because of sports sake lol
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Independent report into Hobart's proposed new stadium has found the costs of the project have been significantly underestimated

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top