Remove this Banner Ad

If not guilty doesn't mean innocent...

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Done :thumbsu:

Here's a legal definition of innocent for you >

"A person accused of and prosecuted for the commission of a crime is presumed innocent until proved guilty"

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/innocent

**** me. How often does this shit have to be rehashed.

Riddle me this. If the presumption of innocence means what you want to believe it does.

Why is it that 1/4 of the people in jail in Australia right now are "innocent"? Have not been to trial, let alone found guilty of anything. And yet they are behind bars and in many cases that incarceration awaiting trial is for 6-12 months, or even longer.

Apparently the judges who lock them up for the protection of the community are yet to benefit from your deep insight into the law.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

EFC are not guilty, if anything they are just guilty of injecting thousands of times with needles full of caramel, after all caramel never hurt anyone.
 
innocent until proven guilty - but I'm already convinced of that - though others seem confused.
Place the word "presumed" in front of your bolded part, and it will make sense.

If they're innocent, they didn't do it.
If they're guilty, they did it.
Neither of these two have anything to do with a court of law, a tribunal or anything else. It's a binary position of they either did it, or they didn't. A court/tribunal does not actually decide whether you are innocent or guilty. Your actions do.

To be found guilty means there is enough evidence to satisfy whatever threshold is in place to determine guilt/innocence. Being found guilty does not actually change the binary mentioned before, just that someone in a position of authority has been convinced to the required level of satisfaction.

Found not guilty means that the person or people in a position of authority has not been convinced to the threshold required of guilt. A presumption of innocence is therefore made, although this does not change the actual binary position of innocent or guilty.
 
Place the word "presumed" in front of your bolded part, and it will make sense.

If they're innocent, they didn't do it.
If they're guilty, they did it.
Neither of these two have anything to do with a court of law, a tribunal or anything else. It's a binary position of they either did it, or they didn't. A court/tribunal does not actually decide whether you are innocent or guilty. Your actions do.

To be found guilty means there is enough evidence to satisfy whatever threshold is in place to determine guilt/innocence. Being found guilty does not actually change the binary mentioned before, just that someone in a position of authority has been convinced to the required level of satisfaction.

Found not guilty means that the person or people in a position of authority has not been convinced to the threshold required of guilt. A presumption of innocence is therefore made, although this does not change the actual binary position of innocent or guilty.
This guy gets it.

Actual innocence or guilt is different from innocence or guilt for the purposes of the criminal legal process (which incidentally is not the process that occurred here).
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It follows that guilty doesn't mean not innocent.

Whatever the next year brings is really quite irrelevant as WADA can never prove any player's lack of innocence.
Guilty does mean gets punished though or some sanction which will comfortably satisfy the foamers.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If not guilty doesn't mean innocent...

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top