Hawthorn Are Shit part II

[catspremiers2007]

Re: Hawthorn Are Shit

Subcribed.

 

[aRT8t]

Hawthorn rubbed it's shit onto Box Hil

 

[catspremiers2007]

Buddy is currently the best forward in the game, and will probably go down as one of the greatest of all time.

60 Goal tall forwards are not all that uncommon, however ones that can't mark overhead are I spose

 

[Lunchlady Doris]

You're an idiot. You probably think Varcoe is better than Rioli, Corey is better than Mitchell and Mooney shits on Buddy, eh?

**** wit.

You haven't beaten us in a final in almost 50 years and we've always been able to beat Geelong. We beat you in 2008 during the pinnacle of your clubs existence.

Keep on believin

Hawthorn > Geelong. Results don't lie.

Results don't lie? What is it, 4 in a row now?

Barlow has played 14 games. Sammy Mitchell is in a league above him.

No, Barlow is better at everything than Mitchell. Disposal, marking, and damaging on the scoreboard. Give it another year and you will know the way most already do.

lol how isn't Rioli better than Hill? Stephen Hill is just another small forward with a bit of pace. I'd take Hill over Varcoe or Stokes, but not Rioli. Cyril Rioli is the next big thing.

He's been the next big thing for 3 years now, just can't quite cut it. Hill is comparable already, and has much more room for improvement.

Has Pavlich kicked 100 goals in a season, including bags of 7 or 8 in a final?

Buddy is currently the best forward in the game, and will probably go down as one of the greatest of all time.

And I'm the ****wit

Buddy has a goals per game average marginally ahead of Simon Minton-Connell. World's tallest half forward flanker, couldn't take a mark in a German bank. Will go down as one of the greatest 'coudabeen' overrated players of all time, I'll give you that.

 

[dymmot]

Shepp is angry at his high level of Pwnage. Now just to wait for the other troll to congregate in this thread who support injunctionthorn. Our favourites Bayer, Inbred Hawk etc will all be in here soon sproution g the same crap .

 

[Jaeger]

Keep on believin

I don't understand this

We always beat you in finals, when it counts, including 2008 when you were at your very best.

No, Barlow is better at everything than Mitchell. Disposal, marking, and damaging on the scoreboard. Give it another year and you will know the way most already do.

He's probably been more damaging on the scoreboard, but Mitchell is better at everything else. When you have two forwards in Buddy and Roughnut, there's no need for midfielders to kick goals.

Mitchell shits on Barlow.

He's been the next big thing for 3 years now, just can't quite cut it. Hill is comparable already, and has much more room for improvement.

Rioli has improved every year. It's becoming quite scary.

Hill is a flashy, soft half forward flanker. Rioli is better than Hill in every department.

And I'm the ****wit

Spot on

Buddy has a goals per game average marginally ahead of Simon Minton-Connell. World's tallest half forward flanker, couldn't take a mark in a German bank. Will go down as one of the greatest 'coudabeen' overrated players of all time, I'll give you that.

Couldabeen? He is already one of the best in the competition and will go down as the best ever forward. Bookmark it.

 

[hawkstars]

Buddy has a goals per game average marginally ahead of Simon Minton-Connell. World's tallest half forward flanker, couldn't take a mark in a German bank. Will go down as one of the greatest 'coudabeen' overrated players of all time, I'll give you that.[/quote]
Yeah your right. What was I thinking?
[youtube]msr3a83qT90[/youtube]

 

[Lunchlady Doris]

I don't understand this

We always beat you in finals, when it counts, including 2008 when you were at your very best.




He's probably been more damaging on the scoreboard, but Mitchell is better at everything else. When you have two forwards in Buddy and Roughnut, there's no need for midfielders to kick goals.

Mitchell shits on Barlow.



Rioli has improved every year. It's becoming quite scary.

Hill is a flashy, soft half forward flanker. Rioli is better than Hill in every department.




Spot on



Couldabeen? He is already one of the best in the competition and will go down as the best ever forward. Bookmark it.

Hilarious

Mitchell is Adam Simpson Mk II. Scrabbles the ball out of a pack and slams it on the boot for an up and under to the opposition.

Rioli is the flashy soft forward flanker. Shit forward and shit midfielder. Tries to do both but can't do either.

Buddy being th ebest ever forward is killer, I love it.

 

[hawkstars]

Hilarious

Mitchell is Adam Simpson Mk II. Scrabbles the ball out of a pack and slams it on the boot for an up and under to the opposition.

Rioli is the flashy soft forward flanker. Shit forward and shit midfielder. Tries to do both but can't do either.

Buddy being th ebest ever forward is killer, I love it.

Geez your such a keyboard hero lady.
Yeah your right rioli is shit.
[youtube]j79oblNoIO4[/youtube]

 

[Rockford]

Yeah your right rioli is shit.

We're not trying to argue that Buddy and Rioli don't have great highlight reels, they do. An argument that Buddy is a better player than Pavlich because he kicked 100 goals once and has kicked some flashy goals is ridiculous. Put Franklin into the Fremantle team of the last 5-6 years and he'd have done very little. As I said earlier, I'm a fan of Franklin's, I'm just being realistic though.

No one is saying Rioli is shit either, but to say he is ahead of Hill is premature. Hill has a great deal more upside, and is far from a "flashy" small forward. I doubt Shepp has ever watched him play.

I'll accept that the jury is out on Barlow as he's only done it at AFL level for 14 games, it'll be hard to know what he may have done if not for his injury. In his 14 games though he had better disposal and was far more damaging on the scoreboard and around the ground than Mitchell. If he comes back and continues in the same vein then Barlow > Mitchell.

 

[Stronzo]

We beat them by over 100 points in the H&A season, and if it wasn't for us kicking inaccurately, playing badly, Hodge being unfit and Rioli doing his hammy, we would've beaten them in the final as well.

Yeah good one.

Geez, we're going to be quite the force next year.

Isn't that what you said last year?

lol how isn't Rioli better than Hill? Stephen Hill is just another small forward with a bit of pace. I'd take Hill over Varcoe or Stokes, but not Rioli. Cyril Rioli is the next big thing.

First of all, Hill is a midfielder. Secondly, you obviously haven't seen him play if you simply believe he is flashy. And finally, Hawthorn are shit.

 

[PoidaCat]

 

[maryjames]

Another typical away performance by the Dawks..

The way this rabble performs there will be a part 3 soon enough..

Oh yeah Hawthorn are shit..

 

[Northworth]

New information at hand.

 

[skipjack]

You North boys have the biggest chips on your shoulders. Pathetic really.

 

[Northworth]

You North boys have the biggest chips on your shoulders. Pathetic really.

 

[skipjack]

No. I just find it amusing that a supporter of a team who won ten games this year can call a team who won 18 games shit.

 

[Bayer_]

Spot on, skipjack. A supporter of the ninth best team in the league has no business calling the third best team in the league shit. And then there's the whole issue about Hawthorn (along with Collingwood, Essendon, and a few others) subsidising Norf's existence.

Run along, Norfworf.

 

[Northworth]

Spot on, skipjack. A supporter of the ninth best team in the league has no business calling the third best team in the league shit. And then there's the whole issue about Hawthorn (along with Collingwood, Essendon, and a few others) subsidising Norf's existence.

Run along, Norfworf.

awww dont cry princess bayer - you get one more game before the preseason starts for you

enjoy

 

[Boxhead_31]

No. I just find it amusing that a supporter of a team who won ten games this year can call a team who won 18 games shit.

Spot on, skipjack. A supporter of the ninth best team in the league has no business calling the third best team in the league shit. And then there's the whole issue about Hawthorn (along with Collingwood, Essendon, and a few others) subsidising Norf's existence.

Run along, Norfworf.

No worries how about it coming from a team that won 19 games has beat you three times this year and the last 7 times we have played

Hawks are shit

 

[skipjack]

No worries how about it coming from a team that won 19 games has beat you three times this year and the last 7 times we have played

Hawks are shit

That I can cop.

Mind you, it's funny how Geelong fans don't start threads about all of the other clubs they have dominated by far more over the past 3 years.

Wonder why that is?

 

[Bayer_]

No worries how about it coming from a team that won 19 games has beat you three times this year and the last 7 times we have played

Hawks are shit

Right you are. We're shit.

 

[Bayer_]

awww dont cry princess bayer - you get one more game before the preseason starts for you

enjoy

Congratulations on your improved seas... oh, that's right, Norf's vaunted youth finished the same spot they did last year.

Looks like all you Norf flogs desperately hoping some onfield success would come and stave off financial collapse need another talking point.

 

[maryjames]

Yep.. Straight sets..Definition of shit.

 

[Bayer_]

Yep.. Straight sets..Definition of shit.

The great pretenders. Hawks are shit.