Ginbey/Lalor incident

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Hollow Knight said:
3 weeks for Mansell.

MATCH REVIEW: Tigers forward learns fate for contentious shove

The Match Review Officer's findings for the Saturday games in round three are in
www.afl.com.au
Click to expand...
What a load of crap. The push was incidental and side on and in no way contributed to the concussion. It's exactly the same situation where Lynch was pushed into the contest during the Carlton games, braced for contact and caught TDK high. Tribunal said the push was incidental to the contact.

This is getting ridiculous. O'Connell chose to contest the ball not knowing what was coming from the other side. Does he not owe himself a duty of care to not put himself in a position where is going to get knocked out? I am surprised that Lynch wasn't cited for his contact on O'Connell.
 
PetterdHoisted said:
Confirmed!!

AFL is officially, 100% indisputably, corrupt.

Ginbey goes free, Mansell gets three.

The only difference is the colour of the jumper.
Click to expand...
The only difference is after seeing Gibney get nothing, they went "hmm maybe that's a bit ****ed" and sent a memo out saying anyone who does that again will be suspended
 
Maddo11 said:
The only difference is after seeing Gibney get nothing, they went "hmm maybe that's a bit ****ed" and sent a memo out saying anyone who does that again will be suspended
Click to expand...
Exactly

One rule for WCE

Another for RFC

RFC player had jaw broken also, much worse outcome, which tribunal is super focused on.

100% corruption, absolutely clear this time.
 
PetterdHoisted said:
Exactly

One rule for WCE

Another for RFC

RFC player had jaw broken also, much worse outcome, which tribunal is super focused on.

100% corruption, absolutely clear this time.
Click to expand...
The Ginbey incident caused the AFL to change the rules:

‘Inform your players’: Tribunal cases loom as AFL warns clubs over charges for pushing trend

‘Inform your players’: Tribunal cases loom as AFL warns clubs over charges for pushing trend
www.foxsports.com.au

Obviously Ginbey should have been suspended too, but calling this corruption just kinda shows how little you are aware of the world around you
 
Wojcinski said:
The Ginbey incident caused the AFL to change the rules:

‘Inform your players’: Tribunal cases loom as AFL warns clubs over charges for pushing trend

‘Inform your players’: Tribunal cases loom as AFL warns clubs over charges for pushing trend
www.foxsports.com.au

Obviously Ginbey should have been suspended too, but calling this corruption just kinda shows how little you are aware of the world around you
Click to expand...
At least we finally have incontrovertible evidence of bias now, the only 'good' thing to come out of this from an RFC point of view?

good for all supporters of the game, surely, as it has laid bare that there is no level playing field in the AFL 'organisation'
 
PetterdHoisted said:
At least we finally have incontrovertible evidence of bias now, the only 'good' thing to come out of this from an RFC point of view?

good for all supporters of the game, surely, as it has laid bare that there is no level playing field in the AFL 'organisation'
Click to expand...

Nice of you to join us, what took you so long 😂 unreal..
 

Log in to remove this ad.

PetterdHoisted said:
Exactly

One rule for WCE

Another for RFC

RFC player had jaw broken also, much worse outcome, which tribunal is super focused on.

100% corruption, absolutely clear this time.
Click to expand...
Must be the only explanation honestly. The AFL had to do everything they could to to ensure Richmond’s reign over the league came to an end so they suspended Ryan Mansell.
 
Maddo11 said:
Nice of you to join us, what took you so long 😂 unreal..
Click to expand...
haha perhaps I'm slow! but surely never has the circle been connected this tightly? Usually the AFL takes you on a wending and winding journey to muddy the waters at least a bit.

6 weeks ago you could cave-in an RFC guys face by in pushing him into on-coming players. There is a huge outcry in the media, etc, etc., but AFL says 'absolutely nothing to see here'. Not a visit to the tribunal to test a new case, not even a 'please explain' to the club. Zip.

4 weeks ago you could push an RFC player into on-coming players, then suspend him for being the meat in the sandwich as he braced for contact.

This week, the jumper colour changed, and the AFL has had a monumental about-face?!
Only now, that an RFC player is the pusher, a non-footy act has been perpetrated?

Anyone defending this shemozzle, give me a break.
 
Wojcinski said:
The Ginbey incident caused the AFL to change the rules:

‘Inform your players’: Tribunal cases loom as AFL warns clubs over charges for pushing trend

‘Inform your players’: Tribunal cases loom as AFL warns clubs over charges for pushing trend
www.foxsports.com.au

Obviously Ginbey should have been suspended too, but calling this corruption just kinda shows how little you are aware of the world around you
Click to expand...
They didn't change any rules after the Ginbey incident.

They just got caught out with people pointing out how the existing rules covered it.
 
Meteoric Rise said:
You made that up.

Most(not all) of our supporters wanted Ginbey suspended.

The current rules allow for that.

We got zero explanation from the MRO to justify his decision, not one syllable.

Now, with no change in the rules, and precedents in-season being binding under the rules, we now see about the 5th player concussed since after a player was pushed into a marking contest.

If they follow the precedent we get no charge, no explanation, no case to answer. If they do something different to that it is an admission they got at least the Ginbey decision wrong.

What decision do you expect?
Click to expand...
Where's it say that?
 
Sam_100 said:
Yep. I wonder who they are going to pick win this year's premiership.
Click to expand...
They picked Richmond to win 3 in 4 so maybe doing the same for Brisbane?
 
Maddo11 said:
The only difference is after seeing Gibney get nothing, they went "hmm maybe that's a bit ****ed" and sent a memo out saying anyone who does that again will be suspended
Click to expand...

Wojcinski said:
The Ginbey incident caused the AFL to change the rules
Click to expand...

If we want to be accurate, the memo came out on the back of Cameron pushing Briggs into a contest that led to Briggs being stretchered off and entering concussion protocols in Opening Round (and also after another 3 incidents in preseason after the Ginbey/Lalor incident.

I said this in the thread on the Richmond board, and I'm going to say it here as well:

I can cop the suspension to Mansell but no suspension for Ginbey if this memo came out before opening round, so we see this come into effect once the season started with proper matches.

But the memo only came out once Cameron nudged Briggs fwd in opening round (far less of a push than Mansell, but if you were to put it through the matrix, would still be careless + severe impact (Briggs concussed) + high contact), yet Cameron was not cited by the MRO.

If the AFL came out and have the memo sent to clubs, suspended Cameron, and then the Mansell incident happened, I'm more than fine with copping the suspension despite what happened in preseason.
 
boncer34 said:
They picked Richmond to win 3 in 4 so maybe doing the same for Brisbane?
Click to expand...
And they will probably gift the new Tasmanian team a couple of premierships by the early 2030's, after showering them with money that the bigger teams generate to give them a leg up.
 

Ginbey/Lalor incident


Write your reply...

Similar threads

mouncey2franklin
  • Poll
MRP / Trib. Archer and Cleary incident, Rd 1, 2025
18 19 20 21 22
Replies
534
Views
12K
ferball
ferball
Lingsface
Papley incident
Replies
11
Views
706
MagpieJo
MagpieJo
WillHayward
MRP / Trib. Jeremy Finlayson incident
2 3 4 5
Replies
106
Views
5K
HairyO
HairyO
Back
Top