Nifft
Premiership Player
Agree with what you're saying. Consistency has to be considered rather than just potential, which is why I don't think McGrath or Parish are elite even though they have some elite traits. I do believe Zach has done enough to be considered elite, even though he has the occasional off game.Not getting into the amount of quality players we have on the list too much but I would say that being elite has to include some kind of consistency at a certain level.
My tiers would be something like this
Legend
Superstar
Elite
Great
Good
Above average
Average
Below average
Bad
Good players can look like great players for a stretch of time but water finds its level and they drop back down to the good tier. That's what makes them only good, not great.
Similarly players can play below their level for stretches.
As time goes on if your playing more lower tier football than your perceived level then you just become that tier (good player strings multiple years together of average football then the good tier looks to be the aberration).
Zach is a great player who looks like he is elite, at times, but cannot string it together enough to be considered truly elite. Not enough game winning performances or moments.
We also have a few players with elite traits, but at some point actual performance has to be what they are. Injuries also play a role, I don't consider you "elite" if you play a 3rd of seasons looking really great in those games but your missing a bunch, best ability is availability so that knocks you down in the ranks (Eg. Ridley).
Would you consider Hird a Legend? The best player I've seen is Ablett Snr, so I'd say he's the benchmark for legend status.
As an aside I hate the way the news articles throw around the term superstar. They're probably doing it for clicks, but every second article seems to talk about how some "superstar" is training the house down or is injured etc.