Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Suppression orders are in force, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
One even reduced bike riding to - BR

 

[passball]

In the FF walk through the Police asked him 'so who is the first person other than a family member OR FRIEND that you saw'.
What's this about a friend?
Whoever thinks William was looking at someone in that roar photo, this is for you.
Interesting he asked that but probably nothing.

 

[gymjam]

I just don’t agree with any of this.

Craddock opinion is his opinion. The podcast presenter’s take or angle is his take or angle.

And as he says “you don’t know what you don’t know.”

Craddock's opinion re the 5 photos appears to be based on the Xways forensic examination carried out on Friday 19th Sept 2014 and somehow after this the times connected to created times were changed? Who was responsible for authorizing this change? What if there is evidence discovered that questions the veracity of this change?

This whole case timeline depends on one unconnected photo that was taken on 1 September 2014. This date is not a typo.

What really strikes me is the time change was apparently based on a photo taken by one of the foster carers on their camera on 1 Sept 2014 that featured in the background of a this photo TV with a broadcast moment of 7s Sunrise show and a news segway that had a time on it and that time was 1hour and 58 minutes later than the photo exif data of the photo taken on the camera.

BUT

On that day the 1st Sept 2014 7s Sunrise was being broadcast direct from Hollywood USA. The Sunrise show was doing their 1st road trip across USA from 1st to 5th Sept 2014 incl.

In the leadup to 1 Sept 2014 Sunrise ran a cash cow comp and this comp also ran during the road trip. The cash cow 'actor' was also present in USA. Huge cash prized were available $30,000 plus.

Basically viewers had to text their address and name to a number by a certain time which changed daily. There would be a random draw for the daily prospective winner who would be contacted. The cash cow team would head to the address at a time unknown to the draw winner. If the door was not answered by the person whose name was used to enter the comp within a set tim, no win.

When a winner was found a staff member would turn up unannounced on winners doorstep at any time of the day.

This would be briadcast live and the time was displayed during the broadcast. There was NO noting if the time was AM or PM! There have been discoveries made that reveal some doorsteps occurred after dark and some in the morning.

Why has the time recorded in the background of the photo taken by one of the foster carers on 1 Sept 2014 photo not been released? It is possibly the most important time of thus case because it was used to set the corrected times of all 5 photos.

The Bali time setting on the camera story - 2hour difference Bali to Sydney and not adjusted on their return to Sydney seems to have been raised to support this 1 Sept 2014 exif data connected to this photo and the image accidentally captured in the background that has an unknown time to the public time .

Did whoever discovered this photo and who authorized the change of 1 hour 58 minutes which is not 2 hours, know that the 7 Sunrise broadcast was live from the USA with a massive time difference of around 19 hours on 1 Sept 2014?

 

[31550]

In the FF walk through the Police asked him 'so who is the first person other than a family member OR FRIEND that you saw'.
What's this about a friend?
Whoever thinks William was looking at someone in that roar photo, this is for you.
Interesting he asked that but probably nothing.

It's a standard police question looking for independent verification of the FF whereabouts at a certain time.

 

[31550]

Craddock's opinion re the 5 photos appears to be based on the Xways forensic examination carried out on Friday 19th Sept 2014 and somehow after this the times connected to created times were changed? Who was responsible for authorizing this change? What if there is evidence discovered that questions the veracity of this change?

This whole case timeline depends on one unconnected photo that was taken on 1 September 2014. This date is not a typo.

What really strikes me is the time change was apparently based on a photo taken by one of the foster carers on their camera on 1 Sept 2014 that featured in the background of a this photo TV with a broadcast moment of 7s Sunrise show and a news segway that had a time on it and that time was 1hour and 58 minutes later than the photo exif data of the photo taken on the camera.

BUT

On that day the 1st Sept 2014 7s Sunrise was being broadcast direct from Hollywood USA. The Sunrise show was doing their 1st road trip across USA from 1st to 5th Sept 2014 incl.

In the leadup to 1 Sept 2014 Sunrise ran a cash cow comp and this comp also ran during the road trip. The cash cow 'actor' was also present in USA. Huge cash prized were available $30,000 plus.

Basically viewers had to text their address and name to a number by a certain time which changed daily. There would be a random draw for the daily prospective winner who would be contacted. The cash cow team would head to the address at a time unknown to the draw winner. If the door was not answered by the person whose name was used to enter the comp within a set tim, no win.

When a winner was found a staff member would turn up unannounced on winners doorstep at any time of the day.

This would be briadcast live and the time was displayed during the broadcast. There was NO noting if the time was AM or PM! There have been discoveries made that reveal some doorsteps occurred after dark and some in the morning.

Why has the time recorded in the background of the photo taken by one of the foster carers on 1 Sept 2014 photo not been released? It is possibly the most important time of thus case because it was used to set the corrected times of all 5 photos.

The Bali time setting on the camera story - 2hour difference Bali to Sydney and not adjusted on their return to Sydney seems to have been raised to support this 1 Sept 2014 exif data connected to this photo and the image accidentally captured in the background that has an unknown time to the public time .

Did whoever discovered this photo and who authorized the change of 1 hour 58 minutes which is not 2 hours, know that the 7 Sunrise broadcast was live from the USA with a massive time difference of around 19 hours on 1 Sept 2014?

Regardless of the time a show is recorded, the time display is 'overlaid' on the video feed by the network when it goes to air and shows the actual time it is being transmitted over the network.