Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * Coroners Inquiry Current

Remove this Banner Ad

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges:
  • Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
  • Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
  • 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
  • Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
  • Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty
TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Suppression orders are in force, please use the following to indicate:

FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:


BCR - Batar Creek Road
FA - Frank Abbott
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
CCR - Cobb and Co Road
GO - Geoff Owens
One even reduced bike riding to - BR :rolleyes:
COG - Consciousness of guilt. Like WHO KNEW?
 
Last edited:
Wallace, do you know if at the CC trial for FF if FM was supporting him by just being there or she did not turn up that…..would be revealing.
And! was not allowed in?
Closed Court mmmm! I think you might have something.
Wonder where he went after?
She was there. She was allowed in the closed court with the FF and Clare was also allowed in the closed court.

Everyone including media, public etc were locked out. Exceptions were the lawyers English and McDoogle (I think her name is McDoogle? She is the lawyer who was pregnant at that time) and all of the photos of the FM that day show her with a brace on one arm/wrist, and she was wearing a blue dress.

Now, on a slightly different topic - I wanted to add that a friend of mine recently sent me a photo they found of the NSWCC inside, if anyone is interested.

It was posted on the Insta of a Sydney journalist but has now been deleted.

Taken: 12 March 2013.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0024.jpeg
    IMG_0024.jpeg
    258.8 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

From post 6,209: in her witness testimony at the inquest - presumably about which neighbours she visited when looking for William - neighbour Anne Maree said she alerted the Crabbs (at No. 51).

But Overington's book quotes Mrs Crabb saying she was alerted by FM and FF running distressed up her driveway: see post 337 (with a few posts following up after that).

MOO, I think being alerted about a missing child would probably be more memorable than hearing a car which sounded like a postie - so is Mrs Crabb's memory correct about who alerted her? If not, maybe her memory about hearing a car that day is questionable? Or maybe Overington's book is wrong? Or maybe Crabbs were alerted twice, first by Anne Maree, later by the foster parents?

Whoever alerted them and whenever that was, the Crabbs then reportedly drove to a neighbour's place to check the pool and then at some time after that drove somewhere else to get a spare key for the Miller house (No. 52) so police could search inside.

Does anybody know what sort of vehicle the Crabbs were driving and when?
 
She was there. She was allowed in the closed court with the FF and Clare was also allowed in the closed court.

Everyone including media, public etc were locked out. Exceptions were the lawyers English and McDoogle (I think her name is McDoogle? She is the lawyer who was pregnant at that time) and all of the photos of the FM that day show her with a brace on one arm/wrist, and she was wearing a blue dress.

Now, on a slightly different topic - I wanted to add that a friend of mine recently sent me a photo they found of the NSWCC inside, if anyone is interested.

It was posted on the Insta of a Sydney journalist but has now been deleted.

Taken: 12 March 2013.
The Sydney journalist perhaps ought to have been more careful about the name on the photo.
 
The Sydney journalist perhaps ought to have been more careful about the name on the photo.
My friend sent it to me. A sleuth who posts on the other forum, and it’s a side pic and they left the name of the journalist who posted the photo on the image.

I could have trimmed it but why? Who cares?

It’s important to have the date on it, I thought, and that’s one of the reasons I didn’t bother trimming after I was sent the pic, before I posted it.
 
Last edited:
From post 6,209: in her witness testimony at the inquest - presumably about which neighbours she visited when looking for William - neighbour Anne Maree said she alerted the Crabbs (at No. 51).

But Overington's book quotes Mrs Crabb saying she was alerted by FM and FF running distressed up her driveway: see post 337 (with a few posts following up after that).

MOO, I think being alerted about a missing child would probably be more memorable than hearing a car which sounded like a postie - so is Mrs Crabb's memory correct about who alerted her? If not, maybe her memory about hearing a car that day is questionable? Or maybe Overington's book is wrong? Or maybe Crabbs were alerted twice, first by Anne Maree, later by the foster parents?

Whoever alerted them and whenever that was, the Crabbs then reportedly drove to a neighbour's place to check the pool and then at some time after that drove somewhere else to get a spare key for the Miller house (No. 52) so police could search inside.

Does anybody know what sort of vehicle the Crabbs were driving and when?

My guess would be a Holden Sandman.
 
From post 6,209: in her witness testimony at the inquest - presumably about which neighbours she visited when looking for William - neighbour Anne Maree said she alerted the Crabbs (at No. 51).

But Overington's book quotes Mrs Crabb saying she was alerted by FM and FF running distressed up her driveway: see post 337 (with a few posts following up after that).

MOO, I think being alerted about a missing child would probably be more memorable than hearing a car which sounded like a postie - so is Mrs Crabb's memory correct about who alerted her? If not, maybe her memory about hearing a car that day is questionable? Or maybe Overington's book is wrong? Or maybe Crabbs were alerted twice, first by Anne Maree, later by the foster parents?

Whoever alerted them and whenever that was, the Crabbs then reportedly drove to a neighbour's place to check the pool and then at some time after that drove somewhere else to get a spare key for the Miller house (No. 52) so police could search inside.

Does anybody know what sort of vehicle the Crabbs were driving and when?
In any case if the account above is correct, FM was only momentarily away from Sharpley - not enough time to drive to Cobb and Co and back. So when was the drive?
 
She was there. She was allowed in the closed court with the FF and Clare was also allowed in the closed court.

Everyone including media, public etc were locked out. Exceptions were the lawyers English and McDoogle (I think her name is McDoogle? She is the lawyer who was pregnant at that time) and all of the photos of the FM that day show her with a brace on one arm/wrist, and she was wearing a blue dress.

Now, on a slightly different topic - I wanted to add that a friend of mine recently sent me a photo they found of the NSWCC inside, if anyone is interested.

It was posted on the Insta of a Sydney journalist but has now been deleted.

Taken: 12 March 2013.
I doubt he’d dob in his wife if she was there listening and watching.

But I can’t understand why Clare was allowed in . . she’s a general public business woman who runs a PR company in favour of the Foster parents, yet media were locked out . Not a balance imo
 
I doubt he’d dob in his wife if she was there listening and watching.
His wife was watching the lying hearing. At the Downing Centre.


She wasn’t watching the NSWCC questioning of the FF. That’s top secret.
But I can’t understand why Clare was allowed in . . she’s a general public business woman who runs a PR company in favour of the Foster parents, yet media were locked out . Not a balance imo
Maybe because Clare now works for Advocacy Australia??
 
His wife was watching the lying hearing. At the Downing Centre.


She wasn’t watching the NSWCC questioning of the FF. That’s top secret.

Maybe because Clare now works for Advocacy Australia??
Works for???? She's the chairperson. It's just another one of her businesses. It's not a charity or even a foundation.
Show Me The Money GIF
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

In any case if the account above is correct, FM was only momentarily away from Sharpley - not enough time to drive to Cobb and Co and back. So when was the drive?
I believe the drive was before she met with Sharpley or any of the other neighbours. …and before FF arrived home.

Did AMS testify at inquest as to what time it was when FM met her when she was outside having a smoke ?

I think that time is important.

If it was 10.40am as has been thrown around, that’s a gap of 17 mins before she rang 000.

On the 000 call she said We’ve been looking for him for 15 - 20 minutes.

On the basis of that, it indicates to me that she totally ignored / discounted any time prior to that. Which means she indicates that William went missing just before FF arrived home at 10.35am.

If that’s when she realised he was missing, that’s almost an hour after the iconic 9.37 am photo ! Plenty of time to head off unseen and hide him, possibly in total opposite direction to Cobb & Co Rd; possible even drove other roads as decoys.

She’s been reported numerous times as saying she was sitting talking with her mother and daughter when she realised it was all quiet - so William was not playing with his sister.

FF also indicated that FM, FGM & FD were on that patio when he arrived home.

I think FM remembered a couple of days later that she Saw a Truck in her travels and in case the Driver remembers her she made up the story about the fast semi-trailer & driver thinking she was waving to him.

Just my thoughts, quite possibly all wrong.
 
Hang on! How com the PR firm was allowed?
The photo to me was not at all intimidating . Am I missing something?
Why was it pulled?
 
My friend sent it to me. A sleuth who posts on the other forum, and it’s a side pic and they left the name of the journalist who posted the photo on the image.

I could have trimmed it but why? Who cares?

It’s important to have the date on it, I thought, and that’s one of the reasons I didn’t bother trimming after I was sent the pic, before I posted it.
Imagine if the FF is an informant.
FM thinking they have nothing and trusting of FF then big bam big bombshell.
Still think he would deserve time but guessing he’d get immunity if he’s gone along with police to help them now.
 
Imagine if the FF is an informant.
FM thinking they have nothing and trusting of FF then big bam big bombshell.
Still think he would deserve time but guessing he’d get immunity if he’s gone along with police to help them now.

I thought part of the reason the top brass wanted Jubelin to rule the Fosters out, was so one of them couldn't be in a position to claim the million bucks?
 
Oh so, I got confused
So the NSWCC hearing for the FF was when? Maybe 2021 October or November?

And then the lying hearing was like October/November 2023.

So what I’m just theorising is that when he went before the NSWCC, maybe he was truthful and helpful and spilled the beans.

Or maybe the cops got him earlier than that and turned him.

Look I don’t know, it’s just a theory and I am probably wrong. My wife says I usually am, wrong that is 😂
 
I thought part of the reason the top brass wanted Jubelin to rule the Fosters out, was so one of them couldn't be in a position to claim the million bucks?
I hadn’t heard this but if FM’s guilty and FF knew all along, I hope he isn’t getting any million dollars.
He’d be just as twisted as her to go along with it at all and for so long.
 
Then why is the police theory based around her and where she drove? Why do they want her on the stand at the next tranche, rather than the "helper"?
I don’t know they’ll put FM on the stand. Maybe, but I think the Coroner either has a good idea of what’s happened to William or she doesn’t, based on the evidence she has.
If it’s an open finding we’re none the wiser unless police lay charges on someone in the future.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * Coroners Inquiry Current

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top