Dean who? I thought they would go with a high profile experienced coach. I wish him all the best but if it don't work I hope the President and others on the board cop it in the neck cause its one hell of a risk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Anyone thinking Connolly or Sheedy would have been a better option because they would have attracted more people to the games is a goose. Winning attracts people to games, not a crackpot failed coach(Connolly) who tries to hype games up but is really not respected at all. Bailey is deserving of the job and i'd almost have the Dees in my top 8 for next year now.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If I was a Dees fan, I would've been very nervous if Sheedy had taken over. What does he have left to prove? What is his motivation?
No worries Brocky. However as Porthos pointed out earlier Port's response was less about their rights and more about doing the right thing by Bailey.Toots, just had to be brief, wasn't implying there has any malice involved. Port did what they had every right to do and in doing so forced the MFC to bring the announcement forward.
And for the record, Panama Red.
Classy effort with a the last game on the weekend
We didnt anounce it, choco williams did.really should have waited for reilly to finish before announcing it.....
If that's meant as a criticism you're out of line IMO. Choco has done everything to promote Dean Bailey. He owes the Melbourne Football Club nothing. What's more he's perfectly within his rights to talk about his own coaching setup of which Dean Bailey is (or was) a part.Mark Williams opened his mouth
For those saying that Melbourne didn't pick Sheedy because they couldn't afford him, consider the possibility that the profile of Sheeds would have generated more than enough sponsorship money and new memberships to pay for his salary.
That they've released Bailey now is a FAVOUR to Bailey, not a punishment.
What, you think he should stay assisting us through to the grand final, and then have one week to work out what he wants the Dees to do in trade week, and with every player currently on his list?
I feel somewhat vindicated that even Dees fans expected their club to appoint a `marketing' coach as opposed to a `winning' one.
If I was a Dees fan, I would've been very nervous if Sheedy had taken over. What does he have left to prove? What is his motivation?
He could ride the list into the ground for three years and not hurt his reputation in the game. He could recruit a bunch of ex-Essendon hacks and get away with it, and the media would still marvel about the raw talent his `smokey' pick players have....right up until you sacked him. And he would walk away clean, leaving the Dees in all kinds of mess.
I honestly don't think sheeds would have as much passion for any other clubs apart from essendon and richmond after all these years. It would be difficult.
Mark Williams opened his mouth
You're both wrong.We didnt anounce it, choco williams did.

If that's meant as a criticism you're out of line IMO. Choco has done everything to promote Dean Bailey. He owes the Melbourne Football Club nothing. What's more he's perfectly within his rights to talk about his own coaching setup of which Dean Bailey is (or was) a part.
[youtube]qod7nSGKag0[/youtube]They should've picked Bill bailey

You're both wrong.
"Melbourne, which ratified Bailey's three-year appointment at a three-hour board meeting on Thursday night, announced his signing via a short statement at 12.44pm yesterday after Bailey had informed Port in the morning that he had won the job.
Williams told the Adelaide media at 12.50pm that Bailey – who was a notable absentee from the Power's training session at AAMI Stadium – wouldn't be in Port's coaching box for tonight's finals-shaping clash against the Dockers."
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,22342414-21543,00.html
Clearly the two clubs and Bailey have worked well together on the process of making the announcement. Any suggestions that Port jumped the gun and spoilt the party are false.
(In any case it's worth reiterating that Port actually would have had a perfect right to announce that one of their assistant coaches would no longer be with the club).
If that's meant as a criticism you're out of line IMO. Choco has done everything to promote Dean Bailey. He owes the Melbourne Football Club nothing. What's more he's perfectly within his rights to talk about his own coaching setup of which Dean Bailey is (or was) a part.
Sheedy could have promoted the club like no other. I guarentee that membership would have gone through the roof if they got him. I love the Dees too but to have them in the top 8 next year is a bit extreme. Why is he deserving of the job? I've never even heard of him before.




1: Party pooper
Yes, we’re looking at you Mark Williams. Did you really have to gazump Melbourne’s appointment of Dean Bailey as coach by announcing it at your media conference on Friday? And then have your club put out a detailed media release on the subject. The poor old Dees were forced to scramble to put out a one-line media release confirming Bailey had got the gig and to make the formal announcement a few hours later, when they had planned a bells-and-whistles event early next week.
And spare a thought for Mark Riley, the Melbourne caretaker coach who was ready for a media conference farewelling Byron Pickett, Clint Bizzell and Nathan Brown when he was ambushed with questions about Bailey’s appointment (and, therefore, his own failure to win the permanent coaching position). Choco, by the way, will be announcing the winner of Australian Idol some time next week.