Cricket Thread: Indian Summer
- Thread starter Mego Red
- Start date
- Tagged users None
We're better off letting them bat the day for 200ish rather than letting Jasprit have a crack at this day 1 deck I reckon. There's going to be a result, so we have to make sure we win it.
Yep, 7 or 8 down for 200, as long as Reddy and Pant are out.
- Oct 16, 2011
- 16,685
- 43,337
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Drugs Are Bad Mackay? I get what you mean about Webster as far as bowling goes, just needs an extra 10k to be threatening. Reckon he might be handy against SL in a months time though as we need someone to bowl the donkey overs there
Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- May 24, 2006
- 80,784
- 164,048
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Moderator
- #10,734
He's bowling really well but dream conditions
Not sure I see him being successful on a flatter pitches
Might be underselling him. His control is good
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 87,500
- 93,228
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Hasn't leaked runs like Marsh has this series & also bowling his fair share of overs to enable the quicks to stay fresh.
Gee, Michael Gough is a good umpire. Rarely gets anything wrong. Complete contrast to the muppet known as Joel Wilson.
Extra height and bounce will help a bit, i wonder whether he bowls within himself a bit to keep that control
Worse... it was a Shane Watson review. Smashing into the middle of middle stump.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 87,500
- 93,228
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Gough is arguably the best umpire.
Last test showed Wilson should really not be umpiring as gets way too many decisions wrong.
Thankfully as have DRS now to correct most poor umpiring decisions, so it is at least fairer.
- Moderator
- #10,741
That was a review out of desperation pretty much
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 87,500
- 93,228
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Gather he just though they have 3 reviews left so may as well use one... but it's about as plumb as you can get.
Once again the technology fails to prove.
Would be very interesting to see the ball tracking on that one, to see if the ball deviated after passing the gloves.
Snicko had a lot of noise on it (particularly after the ball passed the gloves), and the replays were inconclusive at best visually. I'm not convinced either way based on the evidence used by the 3rd umpire.
Snicko had a lot of noise on it (particularly after the ball passed the gloves), and the replays were inconclusive at best visually. I'm not convinced either way based on the evidence used by the 3rd umpire.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 87,500
- 93,228
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
There is going to be another Indian media frenzy...
Looks like we're not going to see the ball tracking on the Washington wicket, which would show if there was any deflection. Disappointing.
Well that's buggered up Boland's figures - 4, 4, 4LB off consecutive deliveries.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 87,500
- 93,228
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Interesting to look at Australian bowling averages...
Hazelwood 6 @ 13.2
Bolland 15 @ 14.9
---
Cummins 21 @ 23.0
Head 2 @ 27
Starc 17 @ 27.8
---
Lyon 9 @ 36.9
Marsh 3 @ 46
India very much reliant on Bumrah
Bumrah 30 @ 12.8
---
Siraj 16 @ 31.4
Sundar 3 @ 35
----
Neddy 3 @ 49
Rana 4 @ 51
Jadeja 4 @ 52
Ashwin 1 @ 53
Deep 5 @ 54
Hazelwood 6 @ 13.2
Bolland 15 @ 14.9
---
Cummins 21 @ 23.0
Head 2 @ 27
Starc 17 @ 27.8
---
Lyon 9 @ 36.9
Marsh 3 @ 46
India very much reliant on Bumrah
Bumrah 30 @ 12.8
---
Siraj 16 @ 31.4
Sundar 3 @ 35
----
Neddy 3 @ 49
Rana 4 @ 51
Jadeja 4 @ 52
Ashwin 1 @ 53
Deep 5 @ 54
