Stronzo
Hall of Famer
All of these posts and not one of you have said the very simple phrase which just sums everything up:
LOL norf!
LOL norf!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Caro will be fapping herself silly.
Yes, presumption of innocence must be an outdated concept. Certainly no-one could ever accuse you of possessing that virtue.Hang on to that dream
Gmab. Defend who you want to. Ignore the evidence.Yes, presumption of innocence must be an outdated concept. Certainly no-one could ever accuse you of possessing that virtue.
Smearing others anonymously, and advocating violence, whilst masquerading as a “social progressive” seems to be more your forte.
Not defending Clarkson or Hawthorn but what evidence are you referring to?Gmab. Defend who you want to. Ignore the evidence.
Well unless there is Video Evidence of Clarkson chasing these women around with coathangers at the moment it's all verbal.Not defending Clarkson or Hawthorn but what evidence are you referring to?
Take Hawthorn’s first pick off them and give it to Norf for all of the lives they’ve destroyed.
Exactly. That’s why I’m asking Aristotle Pickett what evidence he’s referring to but all he did was my post.Well unless there is Video Evidence of Clarkson chasing these women around with coathangers at the moment it's all verbal.
Personally, I'm waiting for this to play out in the actual courts. Being indigenous myself it horrifies me to think that this could have happened in this day and age but until we've had due process I'm going to refrain from anything but laughing at Norf.
The accounts of the 11 Indigenous people and others at the club are evidence you foolish man.Exactly. That’s why I’m asking Aristotle Pickett what evidence he’s referring to but all he did was my post.
I guess that means hes got nothing but the same accusations with no evidence whatsoever.
I’d call it slander until it’s proven. At the moment it’s anonymous and completely baseless.The accounts of the 11 Inigenous people and others at the club are evidence you foolish man.
What else would you call it?
You would, you were big on defending accused rapist Bruce Lerhman as well.I’d call it slander until it’s proven. At the moment it’s anonymous and completely baseless.
Evidence and guilt proven beyond reasonable doubt is the main point of contention though.The accounts of the 11 Indigenous people and others at the club are evidence you foolish man.
What else would you call it?
It's not a court of law. You don't need absolute proof, there's more than enough probable evidence.Evidence and guilt proven beyond reasonable doubt is the main point of contention though.
No one is saying the indigenous people are lying.
But whether you like it or not, the accused still have a right to go through the court process and have a right to a fair trial.
Look at it this way, let's say I spent a night with someone and the next morning had buyers remorse and accused them of assault. The evidence is there that sexual contact happened but it isn't proven that I didn't consent and the accused has the right to defend himself.
P.s. that is an example, not the best but it is meant to show that evidence doesn't always mean conviction. I would never falsely accuse someone of such a life ruining event. That is abhorrent to me.
Never heard of him so keep failing.You would, you were big on defending accused rapist Bruce Lerhman as well
Excuse me? Get away from here with your stinky woke bait.You don't seem to trust women or Indigenous people but white guys are all honest aren't they?
Isn't it going to the federal court though?It's not a court of law. You don't need absolute proof, there's more than enough probable evidence.
The only thing stopping it the trickery from Clarksons highly paid lawyers .
You don't need absolute proof,
Such as?there's more than enough probable evidence.
Who are they and what trickery have they tried?The only thing stopping it the trickery from Clarksons highly paid lawyers .
I know, WTF happened here today while I was at work?******* main bored flogs.
Give it upView attachment 1690470
Such as?
Sorry but a few anonymous Chinese whispers aren’t even reasonable let alone probable.
Who are they and what trickery have they tried?
How have his lawyers seen the case against him if he hasn’t even been interviewed yet??
ATM it’s all trial by media.
Try again, you’re failing hard.Give it up
The out there of it makes me believe that there is some truth in what happened. I don't think they are are flat out lying for the sake of it.Such as?
Sorry but a few anonymous Chinese whispers aren’t even reasonable let alone probable.