Meltdown Clarkson tells everyone to GAGF

Remove this Banner Ad

Hang on to that dream
Yes, presumption of innocence must be an outdated concept. Certainly no-one could ever accuse you of possessing that virtue.

Smearing others anonymously, and advocating violence, whilst masquerading as a “social progressive” seems to be more your forte.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yes, presumption of innocence must be an outdated concept. Certainly no-one could ever accuse you of possessing that virtue.

Smearing others anonymously, and advocating violence, whilst masquerading as a “social progressive” seems to be more your forte.
Gmab. Defend who you want to. Ignore the evidence.
 
well the Admin merge of a main bored debacle into this thread sure has made a mess, some of them dont know how to act here, flogs.
 
Not defending Clarkson or Hawthorn but what evidence are you referring to?
Well unless there is Video Evidence of Clarkson chasing these women around with coathangers at the moment it's all verbal.

Personally, I'm waiting for this to play out in the actual courts. Being indigenous myself it horrifies me to think that this could have happened in this day and age but until we've had due process I'm going to refrain from anything but laughing at Norf.
 
I'm just so proud for North Melbourne to now have a safe place for Tarryn Thomas to return. Good luck Tarryn you star
 
Well unless there is Video Evidence of Clarkson chasing these women around with coathangers at the moment it's all verbal.

Personally, I'm waiting for this to play out in the actual courts. Being indigenous myself it horrifies me to think that this could have happened in this day and age but until we've had due process I'm going to refrain from anything but laughing at Norf.
Exactly. That’s why I’m asking Aristotle Pickett what evidence he’s referring to but all he did was 🌈 my post.

I guess that means hes got nothing to go on but the same verbal accusations supposedly made by anonymous people with no evidence whatsoever.
 
Exactly. That’s why I’m asking Aristotle Pickett what evidence he’s referring to but all he did was 🌈 my post.
I guess that means hes got nothing but the same accusations with no evidence whatsoever.
The accounts of the 11 Indigenous people and others at the club are evidence you foolish man.
What else would you call it?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The accounts of the 11 Indigenous people and others at the club are evidence you foolish man.
What else would you call it?
Evidence and guilt proven beyond reasonable doubt is the main point of contention though.

No one is saying the indigenous people are lying.

But whether you like it or not, the accused still have a right to go through the court process and have a right to a fair trial.

Look at it this way, let's say I spent a night with someone and the next morning had buyers remorse and accused them of assault. The evidence is there that sexual contact happened but it isn't proven that I didn't consent and the accused has the right to defend himself.

P.s. that is an example, not the best but it is meant to show that evidence doesn't always mean conviction. I would never falsely accuse someone of such a life ruining event. That is abhorrent to me.
 
Norf Hawf divvy this shit or make a minnow board


remake1flash111-gif.954941
 
Evidence and guilt proven beyond reasonable doubt is the main point of contention though.

No one is saying the indigenous people are lying.

But whether you like it or not, the accused still have a right to go through the court process and have a right to a fair trial.

Look at it this way, let's say I spent a night with someone and the next morning had buyers remorse and accused them of assault. The evidence is there that sexual contact happened but it isn't proven that I didn't consent and the accused has the right to defend himself.

P.s. that is an example, not the best but it is meant to show that evidence doesn't always mean conviction. I would never falsely accuse someone of such a life ruining event. That is abhorrent to me.
It's not a court of law. You don't need absolute proof, there's more than enough probable evidence.
The only thing stopping it the trickery from Clarksons highly paid lawyers .
 
It's not a court of law. You don't need absolute proof, there's more than enough probable evidence.
The only thing stopping it the trickery from Clarksons highly paid lawyers .
Isn't it going to the federal court though?

Look, if he is guilty I'm 100 percent with you. And I don't think the indigenous players are lying because that is some out there stuff to lie about.

But I don't have the right to drop the axe on Clarkos neck because of emotion.
 
You don't need absolute proof,
A57AC4C7-1374-4447-B3B2-2898BFB18509.jpeg
there's more than enough probable evidence.
Such as?
Sorry but a few anonymous Chinese whispers aren’t even reasonable let alone probable. 🤦🏻‍♂️
The only thing stopping it the trickery from Clarksons highly paid lawyers .
Who are they and what trickery have they tried?
How have his lawyers seen the case against him if he hasn’t even been interviewed yet??

ATM it’s all trial by media.
 
******* main bored flogs.
I know, WTF happened here today while I was at work?

My guess would be some mod flushed a main bored thread to the Bay and then merged it with a thread that was already in the Bay. It's like the main bored mods don't actually understand what they are doing sometimes. Put it in the divvy van if it sucks, don't just dump all these flogs on us.
 
View attachment 1690470

Such as?
Sorry but a few anonymous Chinese whispers aren’t even reasonable let alone probable. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Who are they and what trickery have they tried?
How have his lawyers seen the case against him if he hasn’t even been interviewed yet??

ATM it’s all trial by media.
Give it up
 
Give it up
Try again, you’re failing hard.

Who are his lawyers & what tricks have they played..?

So far you have some baseless accusations, how is that “more than enough probable evidence”..?

I’d suggest you do need absolute proof in this instance for the accusations.

Which part of this can’t you or won’t you accept?
 
Such as?
Sorry but a few anonymous Chinese whispers aren’t even reasonable let alone probable. 🤦🏻‍♂️
The out there of it makes me believe that there is some truth in what happened. I don't think they are are flat out lying for the sake of it.

It's just such outlandish stuff to make up.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Meltdown Clarkson tells everyone to GAGF

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top