Christians are easily startled, but they'll soon be back. And in greater numbers 36:11

Remove this Banner Ad

Welcome to the Ask an Atheist thread II.

Previous part:


Standard board rules apply.
 
Again, once your standpoint is that you KNOW Christianity is not for you, Apologetics will not do it for you. That is clearly the reverse situation to your point that once you're a believer, there's no way out.
There always is a way out, but you are too stubborn to know otherwise. So why say he's a brilliant writer? if his only target audience are Christians, he's hardly a brilliant writer and please note, he is also heavily criticised within the Christian world. A brilliant writer should be for all kinds of audiences. Not just a specific one. He says science should fit into Christianity, i don't know anyone with a semblance of education would agree. But religion does that to you..it switches off that part of the brain.

Lewis a very ordinary writer. Even Tolkien, a devout Catholic, disliked Lewis's Narnia series because of all the forced Christian allegory and apologetics in them. But Mere Christianity is a fiction writer trying to come off as an academic while posturing apologetic arguments that are inherently flawed. (I listed a few of them in my earlier posts, as usual, you ignored all of them and carried on with your posts).
 
Last edited:

Oh so very Christ-like.

I don’t see why I should pay any attention to someone proclaiming the goodness of Christianity while this sort of thing goes on by Christians.
 

Log in to remove this ad.


Oh so very Christ-like.

I don’t see why I should pay any attention to someone proclaiming the goodness of Christianity while this sort of thing goes on by Christians.
Why always focus on extreme nutters like this, as if they represent global Christianity
 
Why always focus on extreme nutters like this, as if they represent global Christianity
Because Christians tell us they’re “saved” from not being Christian.

Also, because it’s quite wicked and undemocratic, the amount of behind-the-scenes influence this mob have.

All very well for them to abjure voting, but that doesn’t give them the right to circumvent it for everyone else.

As you read the article, did it not alarm you to see the degree to which politicians and the police seem to do their bidding?
 
Because Christians tell us they’re “saved” from not being Christian.

Also, because it’s quite wicked and undemocratic, the amount of behind-the-scenes influence this mob have.

All very well for them to abjure voting, but that doesn’t give them the right to circumvent it for everyone else.

As you read the article, did it not alarm you to see the degree to which politicians and the police seem to do their bidding?
Many years ago (and in a previous job), I was tasked to take minutes of a number of interviews with prisoners in the sex offender section of a protection prison.

Over dinner that night (after we had all had long showers to try and cleanse our minds of what we had heard), somebody asked rhetorically why so many of those interviewed had found religion whilst inside,

The most religious of the interviewers expressed (possibly semi cynically ) the mainstream religious approach, that that by finding God their sins were assuaged and they could put their sinful life behind them to start afresh.

The most senior, cynical and world weary of the interviewers expressed a diffferent opinion

1 They believed that expressing a new found religious belief it may help the propects of their release.

2 Churches are full of recently divorced or separated single mums seeking help from the Church community

3 In a Church community, a male may not be expected to quickly form a sexual relationship with the mum and his positive attitude towards the children was percieved part of a deeper support for her

4 Should he submit to the enticement of pre-pubescent children in his care, he could just ask for forgiveness from God until the next time he succumbed

5 Churches are happy hunting grounds for paedophiles
 
Atheism
By
Rowe, William


Atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. It proposes positive disbelief rather than mere suspension of belief.
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
That's not really true in practice. Belief is on a spectrum. Some theists have more faith than others, don't they? In the same way, some atheists strongly disbelieve, some aren't convinced, and some are apathetic.

  1. Strong theist. 100% probability of God. In the words of Carl Jung: "I do not believe, I know."
  2. De facto theist. Very high probability but short of 100%. "I don't know for certain, but I strongly believe in God and live my life on the assumption that he is there."
  3. Leaning towards theism. Higher than 50% but not very high. "I am very uncertain, but I am inclined to believe in God."
  4. Completely impartial. Exactly 50%. "God's existence and non-existence are exactly equiprobable."
  5. Leaning towards atheism. Lower than 50% but not very low. "I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be skeptical."
  6. De facto atheist. Very low probability, but short of zero. "I don't know for certain but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that he is not there."
  7. Strong atheist. "I know there is no God, with the same conviction as Jung knows there is one."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrum_of_theistic_probability
Then you have ignosticism which I also view as a form of atheism.
 
Atheism
By
Rowe, William


Atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. It proposes positive disbelief rather than mere suspension of belief.
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
im a non-smoker. I acknowledge that doesn't tell you about my overall health or what other vices I might have. But it isn't supposed to do that. Other labels can accomplish that.

Im an atheist because I lack a belief in any of the gods that are claimed to exist by religions. And until such time as credible and verifiable evidence (and to an extent, UNIQUE to that particular religion, where the followers of that particular religion experienced it only) for deities is presented there is no reason to pretend they do.

Saying Jesus heard me and changed me life is not credible nor unique. God has better things to 'save' than your privileged first world life.
 
im a non-smoker. I acknowledge that doesn't tell you about my overall health or what other vices I might have. But it isn't supposed to do that. Other labels can accomplish that.

Im an atheist because I lack a belief in any of the gods that are claimed to exist by religions. And until such time as credible and verifiable evidence (and to an extent, UNIQUE to that particular religion, where the followers of that particular religion experienced it only) for deities is presented there is no reason to pretend they do.

Saying Jesus heard me and changed me life is not credible nor unique. God has better things to 'save' than your privileged first world life.
You'll smoke in Hell!

Not gonna lie, Christians and Muslims make me hope the afterlife is real.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Christians are easily startled, but they'll soon be back. And in greater numbers 36:11

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top