Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Without trying to have a go at you mate. You also couldn't see us winning the flag this year, at some stage.
Macrae might not be good enough, but JDG, Nick, Pendles, and Crisp are.I think the worry is inside mid cover for Mitchell, is Macrae really good enough and our third tall backs in Murphy and Howe. Hopefully Dean and Ryan can step up but we should be looking at the likes of Highmore, Hore and other similar replacements in case Murphy is pulled/retires. Elliott is covered with Schulz, McInness and Harrison.
Looking at our best 23 you could potentially add Johnson, McStay, Dean, Schulz, McInness, Noble as players who will be pushing maybe Harrison, Macrae and Carmichael.
This one?
Bingo. For all of our Finals pressure, we absolutely lost the plot in H&A against teams who pinpointed passes and/or broke through our rolling defensive structures. If you can keep the ball pinging around skilfully enough against us, we can really be poor at stopping the leading forwards and/or crumbing forward/mids.My burning question is what’s the next evolution of our game? As time goes by the quality teams come back to the pack because the rest of the competition gets better at blunting their edge. For us that’s our ball movement and wave running which we pulled out of our backsides on GF day after it had gone missing for big chunks of the regular season.
Bingo. For all of our Finals pressure, we absolutely lost the plot in H&A against teams who pinpointed passes and/or broke through our rolling defensive structures. If you can keep the ball pinging around skilfully enough against us, we can really be poor at stopping the leading forwards and/or crumbing forward/mids.
I'd like to see us fine-tune our defence, especially from opposition kick-in where we seem to give up room to allow our mids to run back to the wing. If we forced more one-on-one there, the ball wouldn't move quite as freely as it has done.
Secondly is our forward structure which we've seen glimpses of. If all of Checkers, McStay, Cox, Elliot, Shultz and Hill can stay put and be healthy for the season then we may just see a lot more marks I50 and better set shots rather than relying on pressure goals. Here's hoping.
If they get a good run
Krueger,Dean and mcstay basically like new recruits
If mcinnes and macrae come on..
Gives us a different look
More consistency from aj too
Go pies
Sidey had some lean games mid season, I always knew he’d come good in finals. We have to understand that both he Pendles can only bring their best when absolutely required and that’s fine. Problem is now with the loss of Adams who picks up the slack…Mitchell cannot. I think we are one quality player short in the middle.Now that the dust has settled on a brilliant premiership winning season (I know the draft still to come), I thought I would start a thread asking what peoples burning questions are for our premiership defence next season.
I will start with a few burning questions of my own, so feel free to add any answers to my questions or your own questions.
1) The biggest question from outside our 4 walls appears to be our age profile and how long the likes of Pendles, Sidey, Howe and possibly others like Elliott can keep up their performances. Do we get a major drop off from any of our senior players? I think pendles and Sidey will be fine for at least 1 more season as they are both smart footballers. Howe is a slight query for me and not sure re Elliott (but I think that is partially why we targeted Schultz as Jamie’s long term replacement)
2) Should we be worried about Nathan Murphy long term and his concussions and do we have the defensive cover in a worst case scenario? Tough to answer for me, but I think we should be looking at drafting at least 1 key/intercepting defender in the draft.
3) Will we miss Tay Adams and who steps up in the clearance area of the midfield? I live in Sydney so see very little VFL so trust others to answer this. The 3 main options appear to be Ed Allen, Finn McRae and Reef McInnes.
4) Will Nick Daicos get regularly tagged now and how will he handle it? I think any club that has a tagger on their list will seriously look into tagging Nick. As for how he will handle it, it is wait and see imo.
In summing up, I think it will be very tough to go back to back, but we can always hope.
Fire away fellow pies fans.
Sidey had some lean games mid season, I always knew he’d come good in finals. We have to understand that both he Pendles can only bring their best when absolutely required and that’s fine. Problem is now with the loss of Adams who picks up the slack…Mitchell cannot. I think we are one quality player short in the middle.
Our forward line is solid, provided McStay and Mihocek stay fit.
Backline also, big question mark on Murphy though…poor fella.
Sdeys “ lean games” ( I didn’t really see the same thing) were likely post recovery from his PCL. Didn’t take long at all to get to full form and fitness.
Unlike you I don’t think we will miss adams who due to our surplus of mids was shunted off to spend large chunks of time in the forward line. Adams has been replaced by Shultz who is actually a forward . The last spot in the 22/23 that Ginnivan held can be covered by McInnes/macrae/noble/Johnson/Allan depending upon positional needs and form.
Frampton to return to defence is the cover for Murphy who unlike others I’m not writing off until we hear something official.
This is what you refer to as misinformation.Sdeys “ lean games” ( I didn’t really see the same thing) were likely post recovery from his PCL. Didn’t take long at all to get to full form and fitness.
Unlike you I don’t think we will miss adams who due to our surplus of mids was shunted off to spend large chunks of time in the forward line. Adams has been replaced by Shultz who is actually a forward . The last spot in the 22/23 that Ginnivan held can be covered by McInnes/macrae/noble/Johnson/Allan depending upon positional needs and form.
Frampton to return to defence is the cover for Murphy who unlike others I’m not writing off until we hear something official.
This is what you refer to as misinformation.
Sidney had many lean games compared to his finals output. Look at the stats and impact. As stated in my OP this is normal but we need to account for the loss in productivity. These are facts.
Adam’s was critical to our midfield even though he was shunted to our HFF. He gave a chop out at level that no other ‘HFF’ could. He’s an elite on baller and in 2024 he will have played even more on ball according to my factually correct and indisputable statement in para 1.
Our whole form and fortune changed when Murphy entered the side in 2022. Frampton is no replacement but good try
This is what you refer to as misinformation.
Sidney had many lean games compared to his finals output. Look at the stats and impact. As stated in my OP this is normal but we need to account for the loss in productivity. These are facts.
Adam’s was critical to our midfield even though he was shunted to our HFF. He gave a chop out at level that no other ‘HFF’ could. He’s an elite on baller and in 2024 he will have played even more on ball according to my factually correct and indisputable statement in para 1.
Our whole form and fortune changed when Murphy entered the side in 2022. Frampton is no replacement but good try
Agree, can't believe that the Giants aren't in the first line of betting for the 2024 Flag, they've got so much quality in that side and with the same amount of luck as the other top teams, I can see them winning it - to me, Geelong's fall off was predictable, 1. in 2022, they traded for opportunity and not to cover weaknesses (e.g., recruiting Henry, Bruhn and Bowes - to get Pick 7), and 2. they had bad luck in that they got injuries in the areas they were most weak. Key message from Geelong's year is how we transition on-field leadership from Pendles to the next line of leaders - the Geelong team seemed a little lost without Selwood, and we've got maybe just the one more year to avoid making the same mistake.You mean towards the very end of the year when our form turned really bad for nearly a month?
Where I also said I was hoping it was just them waiting to switch on for finals? Which they did?
You mean that stage?
I mean, pre-season I had us finishing top too but I'm gonna assume you won't acknowledge that though right?
Yeah, our form in that final month or so was of genuine concern. Sue me for showing said concern and at least having the wherewithal to explain where I was coming from at the time and putting actual thought into my thinking process.
I've also explained how I think we can go back to back, but yeah, if you're putting a gun to my head right now, my tip for the flag next year would be GWS. Doesn't seem too outlandish to me.
Their path is almost exactly mirroring ours:
- Got rid of a longstanding coach who was underperforming given the talent on the list
- Took a low profile Richmond assistant (mind you he came 2nd to Fly for our job)
- Took them a bit to get going and then around the halfway mark went on a streak
- Lost the Prelim by a point
Looks eerily familiar no? They don't have any genuine weaknesses in their list (you could maybe argue the forward line? Maybe?) and they have a decent amount of improvement in them.
We're the second oldest list in the comp and as Geelong showed, you can fall quite easily if you rely too heavily on much older players. It's easy to get carried away with back to backs and dynasties in the after glow of a Premiership, but I prefer a slightly more measured approach.
I agree, not sure how we cover an injury to Titch - the problem with pure in-side mids like Adams and Titch is that every side needs more than one, but less than two of them. A simple solution would be to get someone like Mathieson as a "break glass in time of emergency" option - don't like the way he plays, but if Titch suffered an injury, I reckon we'd be happy to have him on our list (not sure that Fin Macrae is a pure in-side mid - hope he has a great pre-season and proves me wrong)Sidey had some lean games mid season, I always knew he’d come good in finals. We have to understand that both he Pendles can only bring their best when absolutely required and that’s fine. Problem is now with the loss of Adams who picks up the slack…Mitchell cannot. I think we are one quality player short in the middle.
Our forward line is solid, provided McStay and Mihocek stay fit.
Backline also, big question mark on Murphy though…poor fella.
Apart from a broken leg at hawthorn, Mitchell has not had an injury in his life. Should we need somebody to cover him it’s likely to be temporary and we can source from within our current list.I agree, not sure how we cover an injury to Titch - the problem with pure in-side mids like Adams and Titch is that every side needs more than one, but less than two of them. A simple solution would be to get someone like Mathieson as a "break glass in time of emergency" option - don't like the way he plays, but if Titch suffered an injury, I reckon we'd be happy to have him on our list (not sure that Fin Macrae is a pure in-side mid - hope he has a great pre-season and proves me wrong)
I agree, not sure how we cover an injury to Titch - the problem with pure in-side mids like Adams and Titch is that every side needs more than one, but less than two of them. A simple solution would be to get someone like Mathieson as a "break glass in time of emergency" option - don't like the way he plays, but if Titch suffered an injury, I reckon we'd be happy to have him on our list (not sure that Fin Macrae is a pure in-side mid - hope he has a great pre-season and proves me wrong)