Updated Bruce Lehrmann Pt2 * BREAKING! Walter Sofronoff found to be seriously corrupt

Remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #95
The Corruption Commission's findings on Walter Sofronoff KC's ongoing communications with NewsCorp columnist and Chair of the Right Wing organisation IPA, Janet Albrechtsen, are damning:


“The overall chain of events in Mr Sofronoff’s communication with Ms Albrechtsen shows that over time he lost sight of the important public function he was discharging,” the commission said.

Parallel to the inquiry, Sofronoff was “engaging privately with Ms Albrechtsen ... who was not a participant in the inquiry and who was known to have strong views about issues that would certainly be the subject of the report to government”.

The former judge’s “attempted justification” that he gave the journalists the report so that they could publish commentary immediately after the report was released by the ACT government without having to read it first was “not tenable”, the watchdog said. It concluded he had “not, in fact, acted in good faith”.

Sofronoff gave a raft of additional confidential material to Albrechtsen, the commission said, including witness statements, drafts of the report and proposed adverse findings against the then ACT director of public prosecutions, Shane Drumgold, SC.



Sofronoff's behaviour in consorting with a leading opinion columnist for the Murdoch press who had a personal and political interest in the Lehrmann criminal rape trial and subsequent defamation trials, including that initiated by Lehrmann's former employer Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds has, imho, all the hallmarks of a politically motivated conspiracy. It MUST be further investigated, preferably by a Royal Commission.

The question that remains unanswered is the motive for Sofonoffs corrupt behaviour and ongoing relationship with Janet Albrechtsen. As a highly experienced and formerly well regarded Kings Counsel he most definitely knew of the consequences for both him and the Public Inquiry he was in direction of if his behaviour and actions became public, as they subsequently did.
Wonder whether the delays in the findings of the WA libel matter have been held off until this was finalised?

This evidence is out in the public forum now with implied back room dealings between the movers and shakers; possibility that Reynolds has been found to have gone back for her scarf?
 
Surely no one seriously thought that Wally Sofronoff, Janet Albrechtsen and The Australian Newspaper were going to accept the findings of the Independent ACT Integrity Commission findings of serious corruption without dragging the whole think back through the courts did they?


1742423670023.png


The next time people hear about the lack of resourcing for the prosecution of serious criminal charges including rape and sexual assault in Australia I hope people now understand why.

Just for a moment imagine if as much money, time and effort was spent on the original ACT rape trial of Bruce Lehrmann as was spent and still being spent on subsequent legal action.

Meanwhile, almost 4 years after they are said to have occurred, another alleged victim of multiple rapes by Bruce Lehrmann is still awaiting for the criminal charges against him to be prosecuted in Toowoomba.
 
Last edited:
Surely no one seriously thought that Wally Sofronoff, Janet Albrechtsen and The Australian Newspaper were going to accept the findings of the Independent ACT Integrity Commission findings of serious corruption without dragging the whole think back through the courts did they?


View attachment 2255131

The next time people hear about the lack of resourcing for the prosecution of serious criminal charges including rape and sexual assault in Australia I hope people now understand why.

What a thoroughly dishonest headline, looks like Albrechtsen wrote it.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I imagine this one will get settled out of court for a tidy sum.

TAYLOR AUERBACH is being represented by Rebekah Giles law firm again.

'March 25, 2025 — 12.02pm'

'The Federal Court has yet to release documents in Auerbach’s case.'


File details​

Court:Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales Registry
Number:NSD413/2025
Title:TAYLOR AUERBACH v SEVEN NETWORK (OPERATIONS) LIMITED
Filing Date:21-Mar-2025
...
DateTimeDocument TitleFiled By
21-Mar-202523:09Originating Applicationtaylor auerbach
21-Mar-202523:09Applicant's Genuine Steps Statementtaylor auerbach
21-Mar-202523:09Statement of Claimtaylor auerbach
....

Legal Representative Applicant
Giles George Pty Ltd
 
So the Sof, is trying to get off.

serious-corrupt-conduct-thrown-out

It doesn't matter if he does because his flagrant corruption has already been exposed to the public gaze. We know he's corrupt.
You said that Pell was guilty when the High Court laughed it out in 7 to diddly squat verdict based on the evidence presented in the lower courts.

Lets see what the Federal Court rules before you give your expert opinion on the matter.
 
You said that Pell was guilty when the High Court laughed it out in 7 to diddly squat verdict based on the evidence presented in the lower courts.

Lets see what the Federal Court rules before you give your expert opinion on the matter.

Pell was found guilty by a jury, and a Royal Commission.

Those High Court deep state guys in wigs and frocks were taking the piss mate, you pell for it again.
 
"The conclusion that the conduct of the Applicant amounted to ‘serious corrupt conduct' was outrageous, egregious, PREPOSTEROUS!

1743736337037.png
 
Pell was found guilty by a jury, and a Royal Commission.

Those High Court deep state guys in wigs and frocks were taking the piss mate, you pell for it again.
evidence before the court couldn’t even pick the month that Pell committed the so called offences. Plus, other wild inconsistencies.
It doesn’t mean that he’s innocent but it definitely means that he’s Not Guilty!
 
evidence before the court couldn’t even pick the month that Pell committed the so called offences. Plus, other wild inconsistencies.
It doesn’t mean that he’s innocent but it definitely means that he’s Not Guilty!

Why do you think the High Court judges keep protecting high profile pedophiles and sex offenders - including that suppression order relating to politicians……

Connect the dots man.

They finally had one by the balls, and you are trying to paint a pretty picture of him! And Bruce!
 
Why do you think the High Court judges keep protecting high profile pedophiles and sex offenders - including that suppression order relating to politicians……

Connect the dots man.

They finally had one by the balls, and you are trying to paint a pretty picture of him! And Bruce!
It wasn’t even close to meeting the threshold of beyond reasonable doubt. Just because you have been brainwashed to believe the victim doesn’t make someone guilty in the eyes of the law. That’s how the Great Crusades were born!
 
It wasn’t even close to meeting the threshold of beyond reasonable doubt. Just because you have been brainwashed to believe the victim doesn’t make someone guilty in the eyes of the law. That’s how the Great Crusades were born!

Lol you fell for all the qanon nonsense with no evidence, yet think Pell and Bruce are innocent despite all the evidence.

Why are you clowning for these grubs?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Updated Bruce Lehrmann Pt2 * BREAKING! Walter Sofronoff found to be seriously corrupt


Write your reply...
Back
Top